scholarly journals Spinogenesis and Pruning in the Anterior Ventral Inferotemporal Cortex of the Macaque Monkey: An Intracellular Injection Study of Layer III Pyramidal Cells

2011 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guy N. Elston ◽  
Tomofumi Oga ◽  
Tsuguhisa Okamoto ◽  
Ichiro Fujita
1990 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 555-578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Morel ◽  
Jean Bullier

AbstractA number of lines of evidence suggest that, in the macaque monkey, inferior parietal and inferotemporal cortices process different types of visual information. It has been suggested that visual information reaching these two subdivisions follows separate pathways from the striate cortex through the prestriate cortex. We examined directly this possibility by placing injections of the retrograde fluorescent tracers, fast blue and diamidino yellow, in inferior parietal and inferotemporal cortex and examining the spatial pattern of cortical areas containing labeled cells in two-dimensional reconstructions of the cortex.The results of injections in inferotemporal cortex show that TEO receives afferents from areas V2, ventral V3, V3A, central V4, V4t, and DPL in prestriate cortex and from areas IPa, PGa, and FST in the superior temporal sulcus (STS). Area TEp receives afferents only from V4 in prestriate cortex and from IPa, PGa, and FST in the anterior STS. Area TEa receives no prestriate input and is innervated by IPa, PGa, FST, and TPO in the anterior STS.The results of injections in inferior parietal cortex demonstrate that POa receives afferents from dorsal V3, V3A, peripheral V4, DPL, and PO in prestriate cortex, from MST and *VIP and from IPa, PGa, TPO, and FST in anterior STS. Area PGc (corresponding to 7a) is innervated by PO, MST, and by TPO in the anterior STS.Examination of the two-dimensional reconstructions of the pattern of labeling after combined injections of fast blue and diamidino yellow in areas POa and TEO revealed that these areas are principally innervated by different prestriate areas. Only a small region, centered on area V3A and extending into V4 and DPL, contained cells labeled by either injection as well as a small number of double-labeled cells. In contrast, areas POa and TEO receive afferents from extensive common regions in the anterior STS corresponding to areas IPa, PGa, and FST.These results directly demonstrate that visual information from the striate cortex reaches inferior parietal and inferotemporal cortices through largely separate prestriate cortical pathways. On the other hand, both parietal and inferotemporal cortices receive common inputs from extensive regions in the anterior STS which may play a role in linking the processing occurring in these two cortical subdivisions of the visual system.


Author(s):  
James A. Anderson

There is important local processing in cortex as well as the more dramatic massive projections back and forth between cortical regions. Using short, slow, local connections eliminates many long, expensive, fast interregional connections. Cortical pyramidal cells connect to neighbors over several millimeters in the form of patchy connections. Connections are often reciprocal between patches. Groups of cells called cortical columns are ubiquitous in cortex and seem to be fundamental architectural units. A functional column is perhaps .3 mm in diameter containing perhaps 10,000 cells. Intrinsic imaging studies of columns in inferotemporal cortex show they respond selectively to complex aspects of images. A small number of columns respond to a complex object. In inferotemporal cortex, these responses might be “words” in a language of vision. There is evidence for scaling of computation from single units to cortical regions. Understanding the function of such ensembles is the future.


2005 ◽  
Vol 94 (5) ◽  
pp. 3368-3387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julianne E. Rollenhagen ◽  
Carl R. Olson

Some neurons in the inferotemporal cortex (IT) of the macaque monkey respond to visual stimuli by firing action potentials in a series of sharply defined bursts at a frequency of about 5 Hz. The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that the oscillatory responses of these neurons depend on competitive interactions with other neurons selective for different stimuli. To test this hypothesis, we monitored responses to probe images displayed in the presence of other already visible backdrop images. Two stimuli were used in testing each neuron: a foveal image that, when displayed alone, elicited an excitatory response (the “object”) and a peripheral image that, when displayed alone, elicited little or no activity (the “flanker”). We assessed the results of presenting these images separately and together in monkeys trained to maintain central fixation. Two novel phenomena emerged. First, displaying the object in the presence of the flanker enhanced the strength of the oscillatory component of the response to the object. This effect varied in strength across task contexts and may have depended on the monkey's allocating attention to the flanker. Second, displaying the flanker in the presence of the object gave rise to sometimes strong oscillations in which the initial phase was negative. This was all the more striking because the flanker by itself elicited little or no response. This effect was robust and invariant across task contexts. These results can be accounted for by competition between two neuronal populations, one selective for the object and the other for the flanker, if it is assumed that the visual responses of each population are subject to fatigue.


2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gy. Sáry ◽  
Z. Chadaide ◽  
T. Tompa ◽  
Gy. Kovács ◽  
K. Köteles ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document