scholarly journals Improvement of Non-motor Symptoms and Quality of Life After Deep Brain Stimulation for Refractory Dystonia: A 1-Year Follow-Up

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clarice Listik ◽  
Rubens Gisbert Cury ◽  
Sara Carvalho Barbosa Casagrande ◽  
Eduardo Listik ◽  
Debora Arnaut ◽  
...  

Introduction: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a treatment option for refractory dystonia's motor symptoms, while its non-motor symptoms (NMS) have been less systematically assessed. We aimed to describe the effects of DBS on NMS in refractory generalized inherited/idiopathic dystonia prospectively.Methods: We evaluated patients before and 1 year after DBS surgery and applied the following scales: Burke–Fahn–Marsden Rating Scale (BFMRS), NMS Scale for Parkinson's Disease (NMSS-PD), Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-8, short-form Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI), and short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ).Results: Eleven patients (38.35 ± 11.30 years) underwent surgery, all with generalized dystonia. Motor BFMRS subscore was 64.36 ± 22.94 at baseline and 33.55 ± 17.44 1 year after DBS surgery (47.9% improvement, p = 0.003). NMSS-PD had a significant change 12 months after DBS, from 70.91 ± 59.07 to 37.18 ± 55.05 (47.5% improvement, p = 0.013). NMS changes were mainly driven by changes in the gastrointestinal (p = 0.041) and miscellaneous domains (p = 0.012). Seven patients reported chronic pain before DBS and four after it. BPI's severity and interference scores were 4.61 ± 2.84 and 4.12 ± 2.67, respectively, before surgery, and 2.79 ± 2.31 (0.00–6.25) and 1.12 ± 1.32 (0.00–3.00) after, reflecting a significant improvement (p = 0.043 and p = 0.028, respectively). NPSI score was 15.29 ± 13.94 before, while it was reduced to 2.29 ± 2.98 afterward (p = 0.028). MPQ's total score was 9.00 ± 3.32 before DBS, achieving 2.71 ± 2.93 after (p = 0.028).Conclusions: DBS improves NMS in generalized inherited/idiopathic dystonia, including chronic pain.

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Jin Jung ◽  
Han-Joon Kim ◽  
Sun Ha Paek ◽  
Beomseok Jeon

: Sleep-wake disturbances (SWD) are one of the most common non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD) and can appear in the early stage even before the onset of motor symptoms. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for the motor symptoms in patients with advanced PD. However, the effect of DBS on SWD and its specific mechanisms are not widely understood and remain controversial. In addition to the circuit-mediated direct effect, DBS may improve SWD by an indirect effect such as the resolution of nocturnal motor complications and a reduction of dopaminergic medication. Here, the authors review the recent literatures regarding the impact of DBS on SWD in patients with PD. Furthermore, the selection of the DBS targets and the specific effects of applying DBS to each target on SWD in PD are also discussed.


2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 289-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Klingelhoefer ◽  
Michael Samuel ◽  
K. Ray Chaudhuri ◽  
Keyoumars Ashkan

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 3931
Author(s):  
Carlo Alberto Artusi ◽  
Leonardo Lopiano ◽  
Francesca Morgante

Despite being introduced in clinical practice more than 20 years ago, selection criteria for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in Parkinson’s disease (PD) rely on a document published in 1999 called ‘Core Assessment Program for Surgical Interventional Therapies in Parkinson’s Disease’. These criteria are useful in supporting the selection of candidates. However, they are both restrictive and out-of-date, because the knowledge on PD progression and phenotyping has massively evolved. Advances in understanding the heterogeneity of PD presentation, courses, phenotypes, and genotypes, render a better identification of good DBS outcome predictors a research priority. Additionally, DBS invasiveness, cost, and the possibility of serious adverse events make it mandatory to predict as accurately as possible the clinical outcome when informing the patients about their suitability for surgery. In this viewpoint, we analyzed the pre-surgical assessment according to the following topics: early versus delayed DBS; the evolution of the levodopa challenge test; and the relevance of axial symptoms; patient-centered outcome measures; non-motor symptoms; and genetics. Based on the literature, we encourage rethinking of the selection process for DBS in PD, which should move toward a broad clinical and instrumental assessment of non-motor symptoms, quantitative measurement of gait, posture, and balance, and in-depth genotypic and phenotypic characterization.


2019 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. 138-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jarosław Dulski ◽  
Michał Schinwelski ◽  
Agnieszka Konkel ◽  
Karol Grabowski ◽  
Witold Libionka ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
pp. 113-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margherita Fabbri ◽  
Miguel Coelho ◽  
Leonor Correia Guedes ◽  
Mario M. Rosa ◽  
Daisy Abreu ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 65 ◽  
Author(s):  
RukminiM Kandadai ◽  
Archana Bethala ◽  
Deepika Sirineni ◽  
Suryaprabha Turaga ◽  
ShaikA Jabeen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document