scholarly journals Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation to the Secondary Visual Cortex at 80% Active Motor Threshold Does Not Impair Central Vision in Humans During a Simple Detection Task

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carly A. Lasagna ◽  
Stephan F. Taylor ◽  
Taraz G. Lee ◽  
Saige Rutherford ◽  
Tristan Greathouse ◽  
...  

Continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) is a powerful form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation capable of suppressing cortical excitability for up to 50 min. A growing number of studies have applied cTBS to the visual cortex in human subjects to investigate the neural dynamics of visual processing, but few have specifically examined its effects on central vision, which has crucial implications for safety and inference on downstream cognitive effects. The present study assessed the safety of offline, neuronavigated cTBS to V2 by examining its effects on central vision performance. In this single-blind, randomized sham-controlled, crossover study, 17 healthy adults received cTBS (at 80% active motor threshold) and sham to V2 1–2 weeks apart. Their central vision (≤8°) was tested at 1-min (T1) and again at 50-min (T50) post-stimulation. Effects of condition (cTBS vs. sham) and time (T1 vs. T50) on accuracy and reaction time were examined using Bayes factor. Bayes factor results suggested that cTBS did not impair stimulus detection over the entire central visual field nor subfields at T1 or T50. Our results offer the first explicit evidence supporting that cTBS applied to V2 does not create blind spots in the central visual field in humans during a simple detection task. Any subtler changes to vision and downstream visual perception should be investigated in future studies.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carly A Lasagna ◽  
Stephan F Taylor ◽  
Taraz Lee ◽  
Saige Rutherford ◽  
Tristan Greathouse ◽  
...  

Background: Continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) is a powerful form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation capable of suppressing cortical excitability for up to 50 minutes. A growing number of studies have applied cTBS to the visual cortex in human subjects to investigate the neural dynamics of visual processing, but few studies have specifically examined its effects on central vision, which has crucial implications for safety and inference on downstream cognitive effects. Objective: Assess the safety of offline, neuronavigated cTBS to V2 by examining its effects on central vision performance on a computerized stimulus detection task. Methods: In a single-blind, randomized sham-controlled, crossover study, 17 healthy adults received cTBS and sham to V2 two weeks apart. Their central vision (≤8°) was tested at 1-minute (T1) and again at 50-minutes (T50) post-stimulation. Effects of condition (cTBS vs. sham) and time (T1 vs. T50) on accuracy and reaction time were examined using Bayes factor. Results: Bayes factor results suggested that cTBS did not impair stimulus detection over the entire central visual field nor subfields at T1 or T50. Conclusions: Our results offer the first explicit evidence supporting that cTBS applied to V2 does not create blind spots in the central visual field in humans. Any subtler changes to vision and downstream visual perception should be investigated in future studies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lara Merken ◽  
Marco Davare ◽  
Peter Janssen ◽  
Maria C. Romero

AbstractThe neural mechanisms underlying the effects of continuous Theta-Burst Stimulation (cTBS) in humans are poorly understood. Animal studies can clarify the effects of cTBS on individual neurons, but behavioral evidence is necessary to demonstrate the validity of the animal model. We investigated the behavioral effect of cTBS applied over parietal cortex in rhesus monkeys performing a visually-guided grasping task with two differently sized objects, which required either a power grip or a pad-to-side grip. We used Fitts’ law, predicting shorter grasping times (GT) for large compared to small objects, to investigate cTBS effects on two different grip types. cTBS induced long-lasting object-specific and dose-dependent changes in GT that remained present for up to two hours. High-intensity cTBS increased GTs for a power grip, but shortened GTs for a pad-to-side grip. Thus, high-intensity stimulation strongly reduced the natural GT difference between objects (i.e. the Fitts’ law effect). In contrast, low-intensity cTBS induced the opposite effects on GT. Modifying the coil orientation from the standard 45-degree to a 30-degree angle induced opposite cTBS effects on GT. These findings represent behavioral evidence for the validity of the nonhuman primate model to study the neural underpinnings of non-invasive brain stimulation.


2014 ◽  
Vol 261 ◽  
pp. 177-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bimal Lakhani ◽  
David A.E. Bolton ◽  
Veronica Miyasike-daSilva ◽  
Albert H. Vette ◽  
William E. McIlroy

2009 ◽  
Vol 120 (4) ◽  
pp. 796-801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying-Zu Huang ◽  
John C. Rothwell ◽  
Chin-Song Lu ◽  
JiunJie Wang ◽  
Yi-Hsin Weng ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document