scholarly journals Perspective on Vision Science-Informed Interventions for Central Vision Loss

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcello Maniglia ◽  
Kristina M. Visscher ◽  
Aaron R. Seitz

Pathologies affecting central vision, and macular degeneration (MD) in particular, represent a growing health concern worldwide, and the leading cause of blindness in the Western World. To cope with the loss of central vision, MD patients often develop compensatory strategies, such as the adoption of a Preferred Retinal Locus (PRL), which they use as a substitute fovea. However, visual acuity and fixation stability in the visual periphery are poorer, leaving many MD patients struggling with tasks such as reading and recognizing faces. Current non-invasive rehabilitative interventions are usually of two types: oculomotor, aiming at training eye movements or teaching patients to use or develop a PRL, or perceptual, with the goal of improving visual abilities in the PRL. These training protocols are usually tested over a series of outcome assessments mainly measuring low-level visual abilities (visual acuity, contrast sensitivity) and reading. However, extant approaches lead to mixed success, and in general have exhibited large individual differences. Recent breakthroughs in vision science have shown that loss of central vision affects not only low-level visual abilities and oculomotor mechanisms, but also higher-level attentional and cognitive processes. We suggest that effective interventions for rehabilitation after central vision loss should then not only integrate low-level vision and oculomotor training, but also take into account higher level attentional and cognitive mechanisms.

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaiyaphot Photcharapongsakul ◽  
Susama Chokesuwattanaskul ◽  
Janejit Choovuthayakorn ◽  
Voraporn Chaikitmongkol ◽  
Paradee Kunavisarut ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the visual outcome and macular anatomic structures on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) of patients with epiretinal membrane (ERM) foveoschisis who underwent vitrectomy. Methods A retrospective cohort, interventional, case series. Participants Fourteen patients (14 eyes) with central vision loss from an ERM foveoschisis underwent vitrectomy at Chiang Mai University Hospital from 2017 to 2018 and had a follow-up period of 12 months. Interventions The 23G vitrectomy with ERM and internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling was performed by a single surgeon. Main outcomes Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and anatomic appearance on SD-OCT were assessed at the time of preoperative evaluations and post-operative follow-ups at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Results Fourteen patients with a mean (SD) age of 67.9 (7.9) years and a mean (SD) visual acuity (VA) of 0.6 (0.1) LogMAR units were included in this study. Significant VA improvements were observed at the 3-month (0.43 (0.14) LogMAR unit), 6-month (0.45 (0.16) LogMAR unit) and 12-month (0.37 (0.21) LogMAR unit) post-operative visits compared to baseline, all with P-values < 0.001. At month 12, there were vision improvements of ≥3 lines in 8 (57.2%) patients, vision improvements of 1 or 2 lines in 2 (14.3%) patients, vision remained at the same line of pre-operation in 3 (21.4%) patients, and vision decreased by 1 line in 1 (7.1%) patient. Regarding the anatomical outcomes, 13 (92.9%) patients achieved anatomical foveal restoration, while one had persistent intraretinal schisis at the 12-month follow-up. The median time to achieve a foveal restoration was 3 months. No significant visual impairments were observed post-operatively. Conclusion In patients with central vision loss from ERM foveoschisis, vitrectomy with ILM stripping tended to improve both visual and anatomical outcomes.


Ophthalmology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 121 (3) ◽  
pp. 727-732 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabyasachi Sengupta ◽  
Suzanne W. van Landingham ◽  
Sharon D. Solomon ◽  
Diana V. Do ◽  
David S. Friedman ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sania Vidas Pauk ◽  
Nenad Vukojević ◽  
Sonja Jandroković ◽  
Miro Kalauz ◽  
Martina Tomić ◽  
...  

Central vision loss, photopsia, floaters and macular edema in a highly myopic patient can easily be misrelated to high myopia complications. However, in atypical cases, detailed examination along with a thorough diagnostic is required to establish the right diagnosis, which is often beyond the limits of the condition originally considered.


2021 ◽  
pp. bjophthalmol-2021-318809
Author(s):  
Tiffany Ma ◽  
Joanne L Sims ◽  
Sonya Bennett ◽  
Shenton Chew ◽  
Rachael L Niederer

AimsTo examine presentation, management and long-term sequelae of ocular hypertension and uveitic glaucoma.MethodsRetrospective observational study of all subjects with uveitic glaucoma or ocular hypertension seen in Auckland uveitis clinics over the last 10 years.ResultsA total of 188 eyes of 139 subjects with uveitic glaucoma or ocular hypertension were included for analysis. Total follow-up was 1854.5 eye years (mean 9.9 years). The mean age at uveitis diagnosis was 49.3 years. 52.5% of subjects were male. The most common diagnoses were idiopathic uveitis (29.3%), sarcoidosis (13.3%), herpes zoster (6.9%), HLA-B27 uveitis (6.9%), tuberculosis (5.9%) and Posner-Schlossmann or cytomegalovirus (CMV) uveitis (5.3%). Median intraocular pressure (IOP) at diagnosis was 35 mm Hg (IQR 29–45). 144 eyes (77.0%) developed glaucoma during the follow-up period, of whom 41 lost some central vision due to glaucoma. Oral acetazolamide was required for IOP control in 64.5%, 50 eyes underwent trabeculectomy, 18 eyes required a tube and 6 underwent minimally invasive glaucoma surgery.ConclusionRapid progression was observed from ocular hypertension to uveitic glaucoma. Uveitic glaucoma is aggressive, with high likelihood of requiring surgical management and high risk of central vision loss. Close collaboration between uveitis and glaucoma specialists is required to maximise outcomes for these patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document