scholarly journals A Predictive Genetic Signature for Response to Fluoropyrimidine-Based Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Clinical Stage II and III Rectal Cancer

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Chan ◽  
Michael T. Kinsella ◽  
Joseph E. Willis ◽  
Huankai Hu ◽  
Harry Reynolds ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
pp. 000313482095029
Author(s):  
Leah E. Hendrick ◽  
Jacob D. Buckner ◽  
Whitney M. Guerrero ◽  
David Shibata ◽  
Nathan M. Hinkle ◽  
...  

Background In the United States, patients with clinical stage II or III rectal cancer typically receive neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (chemo/XRT) over a 5-6 week period followed by a 6-10 week break prior to proctectomy. In the current study, we evaluate the utilization of restaging studies performed and detection of disease progression during this window. Methods A retrospective review of patients with clinical stage II/III rectal cancer was performed. Medical records were analyzed to collect clinicopathologic data and the performance and results of preoperative, early postoperative, and first surveillance CT and/or PET/CT in patients completing long course neoadjuvant chemo/XRT and undergoing proctectomy. Results Between 2005 and 2017, 176 patients with clinical stage II or III rectal adenocarcinoma completed neoadjuvant chemo/XRT and underwent proctectomy. Preoperative restaging with CT CAP and/or CT/PET was performed in 72 (40.9%) patients with no detection of disease progression. Of the 104 patients without preoperative restaging, 1 had intraoperative detection of liver metastases and 31 had early postoperative reimaging (within 30 days of proctectomy) of which 2 had detection of new pulmonary metastases. Among 72 patients with no preoperative or early postoperative reimaging, first surveillance imaging was available in 47 and detected new metastases in 8 (17%). Discussion In patients with clinical stage II/III rectal cancer who undergo long course neoadjuvant chemo/XRT, perioperative reimaging with CT CAP and/or PET/CT detects new metastases in a small percentage of patients. A multi-institutional, prospective analysis using standardized staging protocols is warranted to better determine the value of preoperative restaging in these patients.


2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. 1073-1079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shin Fujita ◽  
Seiichiro Yamamoto ◽  
Takayuki Akasu ◽  
Yoshihiro Moriya

2020 ◽  
Vol 219 (3) ◽  
pp. 406-410
Author(s):  
Mariane Gouvêa Monteiro de Camargo ◽  
Xhileta Xhaja ◽  
Alexandra Aiello ◽  
David Liska ◽  
Emre Gorgun ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14535-e14535
Author(s):  
Christina Sing-Ying Wu ◽  
Lai Wei ◽  
Katherine Glass ◽  
John Wilson ◽  
Sherif Abdel-Misih ◽  
...  

e14535 Background: Pts with stage II/III rectal cancers are treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgical resection followed by adjuvant CT per practice guidelines. It is unclear whether adjuvant CT provides survival benefit, and the purpose of this study was to measure outcome in pts who did and did not receive adjuvant CT. Methods: We used a prospectively collected database for pts treated at The Ohio State University and analyzed overall survival (OS), time to recurrence (TTR), pt characteristics, tumor features, and treatments. Survival curves were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Age was compared using the Wilcoxon test, and other categorical variables were compared using Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Results: Between August, 2005 to July, 2011, 110 pts were identified and 71 pts had received adjuvant CT. There was no significant difference in sex, race, pathologic tumor (T) stage, and pathologic complete response between the two groups. Pts receiving adjuvant CT were significantly younger (median age 54.3 vs. 62 years, p=0.01) and had more advanced pathologic nodal (N) stage (43 vs. 19% N1 or N2, p=0.02). Median OS was 72.6 months with CT vs. 36.4 months without CT (p=0.0003). Median TTR has not yet been reached. Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis, adjuvant CT was associated with a longer OS despite more advanced pathologic nodal staging. Prospective randomized studies are warranted to determine whether adjuvant CT provides a survival benefit for pts across the spectrum of stage II and III rectal cancer. [Table: see text]


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 518-518
Author(s):  
Christina Sing-Ying Wu ◽  
Lai Wei ◽  
Katherine Glass ◽  
John Wilson ◽  
Sherif Abdel-Misih ◽  
...  

518 Background: Pts with stage II/III rectal cancers are treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgical resection followed by adjuvant CT per practice guidelines. It is unclear whether adjuvant CT provides survival benefit, and the purpose of this study was to measure outcome in pts who did and did not receive adjuvant CT. Methods: We used a prospectively collected database for pts treated at The Ohio State University, and analyzed overall survival (OS), time to recurrence (TTR), pt characteristics, tumor features, and treatments. Survival curves were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Age was compared using the Wilcoxon test, and other categorical variables were compared using Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Results: Between August 2005 to July 2011, 110 pts were identified and 71 pts had received adjuvant CT. There was no significant difference in sex, race, pathologic tumor (T) stage, and pathologic complete response between the two pt groups. Pts receiving adjuvant CT were significantly younger (median age 54.3 vs. 62 years, p=0.01) and had more advanced pathologic nodal (N) stage (43 vs. 19%, p=0.02). Median OS was 72.6 months with CT vs. 36.4 months without CT (p=0.0003). Median TTR has not yet been reached. Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis, adjuvant CT was associated with a longer OS despite more advanced pathologic nodal staging. Prospective randomized studies are warranted to determine whether adjuvant CT provides a survival benefit for pts across the spectrum of stage II and III rectal cancer. [Table: see text]


2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 434-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Oliva Perez ◽  
Angelita Habr-Gama ◽  
Sidney Tomyo Nishida Arazawa ◽  
Viviane Rawet ◽  
Sheila Aparecida Coelho Siqueira ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14591-14591 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. M. Rishe ◽  
S. Malamud ◽  
K. Hu ◽  
W. Enker ◽  
P. Kozuch ◽  
...  

14591 Background: 5-FU based neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) has become the standard of care for stage 2 and 3 rectal cancer (ca). Pathologic complete responses (pCR) and downstaging have been associated with improved survival outcomes. The addition of oxaliplatin or irinotecan to neoadjuvant treatment has led to improved pCR and downstaging. The feasibility and efficacy of “total” oxaliplatin therapy (pre and postoperative oxaliplatin) for stage 2 and 3 rectal ca patients has yet to be defined. Objective: To determine the feasibility, toxicity and efficacy of neoadjuvant oxaliplatin, 5-FU and RT followed by surgery, with postop adjuvant modified FOLFOX6. Methods: Single institution, single arm phase II trial of oxaliplatin 60mg/m2 weekly for 6 weeks with continuous infusion 5- FU 225 mg/m2/excision. Postoperative therapy consisted of mFOLFOX6 every 2 weeks for 6 cycles. Eligibility included previously untreated, histologically proven rectal cancer, T3–4N0M0 or TanyN+M0 (stage II-III). Results: 15 pts have been enrolled in this study. One died of disease prior to CRT. Eight pts have completed total oxaliplatin therapy. One pt had 1 cycle deleted due to grade 2 neuropathy. Prior to adjuvant therapy 2 pts dropped out: 1 from pulmonary symptoms and one asthenia. Two pts attained a pCR and 6 attained downstaging. Significant toxicity has been limited to grade 3 neuropathy in one pt (completely resolved) and one grade 3 GI toxicity (self limited). Conclusions: Early analysis shows the feasibility of pre and post operative oxaliplatin based therapy. The limited data permit only observation of pCR and tumor downstaging rates but toxicity outcomes are encouraging. Further accrual and follow-up will better define efficacy and toxicity of this regimen. [Table: see text]


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 584-584
Author(s):  
Mary E. Charlton ◽  
Karyn Beth Stitzenberg ◽  
Chi Lin ◽  
Grelda Yazmin Juarez ◽  
Thorvardur Ragnar Halfdanarson ◽  
...  

584 Background: Standard therapy for stage II/III rectal cancer includes surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Multiple trials demonstrated neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) provides better local control and decreased morbidity compared to adjuvant CRT, though differences in overall survival and long-term QoL have not been demonstrated. We examined impact of treatment (pre-op CRT/post-op CRT/no CRT) on long-term QoL. Methods: CanCORS patients with survey/medical record data diagnosed in 2003-2005 with stage II/III rectal (non-rectosigmoid) cancer had resection and survived > 7 years were included. QoL (SF-36, EQ-5D) measures and defecation problems were derived from surveys at 14 months and 7 years post-diagnosis. Mean scores were adjusted for the following when significant: age, gender, stage, sphincter preservation, comorbidities, and baseline self-reported health status and QoL scores. Results: Of 119 patients, 53% received pre-op CRT, 23% post-op CRT, and 24% no CRT. Of 114 patients with 14-month follow-up, Pre-op CRT and No CRT groups had better EQ-5D adjusted mean scores but worse defecation scale (DS) scores compared to the Post-op CRT group. Of 49 disease-free survivors with 7 years follow-up, there were no differences among groups in QoL scores, but the No CRT group had better DS scores than other groups. Conclusions: No major differences were detected in long-term QoL based on treatment aside from the DS, though sample sizes became small. Regardless of treatment, long term (7y) mental health and vitality were generally comparable to U.S. norms, while physical health and overall health status (EQ-5D) were somewhat lower. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document