scholarly journals A Prognostic Signature Based on Immunogenomic Profiling Offers Guidance for Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer Treatment

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianyao Gao ◽  
Ting Tang ◽  
Baohui Zhang ◽  
Guang Li

Our study aimed to develop an immune prognostic signature that could provide accurate guidance for the treatment of esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC). By implementing Single-Sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (ssGSEA), we established two ESCC subtypes (Immunity High and Immunity Low) in GSE53625 based on immune-genomic profiling of twenty-nine immune signature. We verified the reliability and reproducibility of this classification in the TCGA database. Immunity High could respond optimally to immunotherapy due to higher expression of immune checkpoints, including PD1, PDL1, CTLA4, and CD80. We used WGCNA analysis to explore the underlying regulatory mechanism of the Immunity High group. We further identified differentially expressed immune-related genes (CCR5, TSPAN2) in GSE53625 and constructed an independent two-gene prognostic signature we internally validated through calibration plots. We established that high-risk ESCC patients had worse overall survival (P=0.002, HR=2.03). Besides, high-risk ESCC patients had elevated levels of infiltrating follicle-helper T cells, naïve B cells, and macrophages as well as had overexpressed levels of some immune checkpoints, including B3H7, CTLA4, CD83, OX40L, and GEM. Moreover, through analyzing the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) database, the high-risk group demonstrated drug resistance to some chemotherapy and targeted drugs such as paclitaxel, gefitinib, erlotinib, and lapatinib. Furthermore, we established a robust nomogram model to predict the clinical outcome in ESCC patients. Altogether, our proposed immune prognostic signature constitutes a clinically potential biomarker that will aid in evaluating ESCC outcomes and promote personalized treatment.

Author(s):  
Daniel Mathies ◽  
Tsuneo Oyama ◽  
Ingo Steinbrück ◽  
Franz Ludwig Dumoulin

Abstract Background Endoscopic resection is the treatment of choice for early esophageal cancers. However, resections comprising more than 70–80 % of the circumference are associated with a high risk of stricture formation. Currently, repetitive local injections and/or systemic steroids are given for prevention. Case report We present here the case of a 78-year-old male patient who had a near circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection for a pT1a mm, L0, V0, R0, G2 esophageal squamous cell cancer. At the end of endoscopic resection, 80 mg of triamcinolone was injected locally. The patient was then treated with oro-dispersible budesonide tablets (2 × 1 mg/day) and nystatin (4 × 100 000 I.E.) for 8 weeks. This treatment resulted in complete healing without any stricture formation and did not result in any complications. Discussion Treatment with orodispersible budesonide tablets could help prevent strictures after large endoscopic resections in the esophagus.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Chieh Ho ◽  
Yuan-Chun Lai ◽  
Hsuan-Yu Lin ◽  
Ming-Hui Ko ◽  
Sheng-Hung Wang ◽  
...  

AbstractWe aimed to determine the prognostic significance of cardiac dose and hematological immunity parameters in esophageal cancer patients after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). During 2010–2015, we identified 101 newly diagnosed esophageal squamous cell cancer patients who had completed definitive CCRT. Patients' clinical, dosimetric, and hematological data, including absolute neutrophil count, absolute lymphocyte count, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), at baseline, during, and post-CCRT were analyzed. Cox proportional hazards were calculated to identify potential risk factors for overall survival (OS). Median OS was 13 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.38–15.63). Univariate analysis revealed that male sex, poor performance status, advanced nodal stage, higher percentage of heart receiving 10 Gy (heart V10), and higher NLR (baseline and follow-up) were significantly associated with worse OS. In multivariate analysis, performance status (ECOG 0 & 1 vs. 2; hazard ratio [HR] 3.12, 95% CI 1.30–7.48), heart V10 (> 84% vs. ≤ 84%; HR 2.24, 95% CI 1.26–3.95), baseline NLR (> 3.56 vs. ≤ 3.56; HR 2.36, 95% CI 1.39–4.00), and follow-up NLR (> 7.4 vs. ≤ 7.4; HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.12–3.41) correlated with worse OS. Volume of low cardiac dose and NLR (baseline and follow-up) were associated with worse patient survival.


2005 ◽  
Vol 129 (3) ◽  
pp. 863-873 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul J. Limburg ◽  
Wenqiang Wei ◽  
Dennis J. Ahnen ◽  
Youlin Qiao ◽  
Ernest T. Hawk ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document