scholarly journals The Association Between Embryo Quality, Number of Transferred Embryos and Live Birth Rate After Vitrified Cleavage-Stage Embryos and Blastocyst Transfer

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qianqian Zhu ◽  
Jiaying Lin ◽  
Haoyuan Gao ◽  
Ningling Wang ◽  
Bian Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Embryo Quality ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Blastocyst Transfer ◽  
Cleavage Stage

Live birth rate and neonatal outcome following cleavage-stage embryo transfer versus blastocyst transfer using the freeze-all strategy

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 892-900 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qianqian Zhu ◽  
Jing Zhu ◽  
Yun Wang ◽  
Bian Wang ◽  
Ningling Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Neonatal Outcome ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Blastocyst Transfer ◽  
Cleavage Stage ◽  
Cleavage Stage Embryo ◽  
Stage Embryo

Female obesity does not impact live birth rate after frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 859-865
Author(s):  
E Prost ◽  
A Reignier ◽  
F Leperlier ◽  
P Caillet ◽  
P Barrière ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Embryo Quality ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Normal Weight ◽  
Blastocyst Transfer ◽  
Obese Women ◽  
Fresh Embryo Transfer ◽  
Weight Groups

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Does female obesity affect live birth rate after frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer? SUMMARY ANSWER Live birth rate was not statistically different between obese and normal weight patients after frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer (FBT). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Obesity is a major health problem across the world, especially in women of reproductive age. It impacts both spontaneous fertility and clinical outcomes after assisted reproductive technology. However, the respective impact of female obesity on oocyte quality and endometrial receptivity remains unclear. While several studies showed that live birth rate was decreased in obese women after fresh embryo transfer in IVF cycle, only two studies have evaluated the effects of female body mass index (BMI) on pregnancy outcomes after frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer (FBT), reporting conflicting data. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This retrospective case control study was conducted in all consecutive frozen-thawed autologous blastocyst transfer (FBT) cycles conducted between 2012 and 2017 in a single university-based centre. A total of 1415 FBT cycles performed in normal weight women (BMI = 18.5–24.9 kg/m2) and 252 FBT cycles performed in obese women (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) were included in the analysis. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Endometrial preparation was standard and based on hormonal replacement therapy. One or two blastocysts were transferred according to couple’s history and embryo quality. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Female and male age, smoking status, basal AMH level and type of infertility were comparable in obese and normal weight groups. Concerning FBT cycles, the duration of hormonal treatment, the stage and number of embryos (84% single blastocyst transfer and 16% double blastocysts transfer) used for transfer were comparable between both groups. Mean endometrium thickness was significantly higher in obese than in normal weight group (8.7 ± 1.8 vs 8.1 ± 1.6 mm, P < 0.0001). Concerning FBT cycle outcomes, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate were comparable in obese and in normal weight groups. Odds ratio (OR) demonstrated no association between live birth rate after FBT and female BMI (OR = 0.92, CI 0.61–1.38, P = 0.68). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Anthropometric parameters such as hip to waist ratio were not used. Polycystic ovarian syndrome status was not included in the analysis. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Our study showed that live birth rate after frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer was not statistically different in obese and in normal-weight women. Although this needs confirmation, this suggests that the impairment of uterine receptivity observed in obese women after fresh embryo transfer might be associated with ovarian stimulation and its hormonal perturbations rather than with oocyte/embryo quality. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No external funding was received. There are no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.

scholarly journals Comparing the cumulative live birth rate of cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfers between IVF cycles: a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled superiority trial (the ToF trial)

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. e042395
Author(s):  
Simone Cornelisse ◽  
Liliana Ramos ◽  
Brigitte Arends ◽  
Janneke J Brink-van der Vlugt ◽  
Jan Peter de Bruin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Oocyte Retrieval ◽  
Blastocyst Stage ◽  
Cleavage Stage ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth Rate ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth ◽  
Superiority Trial

IntroductionIn vitro fertilisation (IVF) has evolved as an intervention of choice to help couples with infertility to conceive. In the last decade, a strategy change in the day of embryo transfer has been developed. Many IVF centres choose nowadays to transfer at later stages of embryo development, for example, transferring embryos at blastocyst stage instead of cleavage stage. However, it still is not known which embryo transfer policy in IVF is more efficient in terms of cumulative live birth rate (cLBR), following a fresh and the subsequent frozen–thawed transfers after one oocyte retrieval. Furthermore, studies reporting on obstetric and neonatal outcomes from both transfer policies are limited.Methods and analysisWe have set up a multicentre randomised superiority trial in the Netherlands, named the Three or Fivetrial. We plan to include 1200 women with an indication for IVF with at least four embryos available on day 2 after the oocyte retrieval. Women are randomly allocated to either (1) control group: embryo transfer on day 3 and cryopreservation of supernumerary good-quality embryos on day 3 or 4, or (2) intervention group: embryo transfer on day 5 and cryopreservation of supernumerary good-quality embryos on day 5 or 6. The primary outcome is the cLBR per oocyte retrieval. Secondary outcomes include LBR following fresh transfer, multiple pregnancy rate and time until pregnancy leading a live birth. We will also assess the obstetric and neonatal outcomes, costs and patients’ treatment burden.Ethics and disseminationThe study protocol has been approved by the Central Committee on Research involving Human Subjects in the Netherlands in June 2018 (CCMO NL 64060.000.18). The results of this trial will be submitted for publication in international peer-reviewed and in open access journals.Trial registration numberNetherlands Trial Register (NL 6857).

scholarly journals The effect of air bubble position on ART outcome in frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tingting Yang ◽  
Bo Chen ◽  
Xiaoyan Sun ◽  
Qingyang Li ◽  
Qiumei Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Blastocyst Transfer ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Air Bubble ◽  
Art Outcome

Abstract Background So far, only few literatures have studied the relationship between blastocyst transfer position and ART outcomes, and the conclusions are still controversial. Our study is to evaluate the effect of air bubble position on ART outcome and to find the optimal embryo transfer position in frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer. Methods This study included a retrospective cohort analysis of 399 frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfers ultrasound-guided performed between June 1, 2017 and November 30, 2020. All of the women scheduled for frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfers ultrasound-guided. The primary outcome is clinical pregnancy rate and the secondary outcome is live birth rate. Statistical analyses were conducted using One-way Anova, Kruscal Whallis H test, chi-square test and Smooth curve fitting. Results When BFD was less than 19 mm, there was no significant change in clinical pregnancy rate as BFD increased (OR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.89 to 1.02, P = 0.1373); when BFD was more than 19 mm, the clinical pregnancy rate decreased by 16% for every 1 mm increase in BFD (OR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.72 to 0.98, P = 0.0363). The effect of BFD on live birth rate were similar to that on clinical pregnancy rate, the inflection point was 19mm, when BFD was more than 19 mm, the live birth rate decreases by 58% for every 1 mm increase in BFD (OR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.86, P = 0.0174) Conclusions The ideal pregnancy outcome can be achieved within 19mm from uterus fundus after single blastocyst transfer, The clinical pregnancy and live birth at a distance of more 19mm from the uterus fundus have a cliff-like downward trend.

P–304 The endometrial preparation protocol does not affect the live-birth-rate after vitrified-warmed euploid single blastocyst transfers: an analysis of 1884 procedures

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Petriglia ◽  
A Vaiarelli ◽  
D Cimadomo ◽  
C Gentile ◽  
F Fiorini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Live Birth ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Blastocyst Transfer ◽  
Workload Management ◽  
Endometrial Preparation ◽  
Blastocyst Quality ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Micronized Progesterone

Abstract Study question Is the live-birth-rate (LBR) different when comparing artificial (AC) and modified-natural (M-NC) cycle for endometrial preparation to vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfer? Summary answer The LBR after vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfer seem independent of the endometrial preparation administered. What is known already Only the transfer of a competent embryo on a receptive endometrium might result in successful implantation. Three main protocols for endometrial preparation to vitrified-warmed embryo transfer exist: NC, M-NC, and AC. None among them, though, has been shown more appropriate than the others to date, especially since, only in a few studies, the analysis was restricted to single euploid blastocyst transfers to limit the impact of embryonic issues on implantation. In conclusion, no clear consensus exists and the choice is still largely based on menstrual/ovarian cycle characteristics and patient’s needs. Study design, size, duration All first vitrified-warmed single euploid blastocyst transfers performed between April–2013 and March–2020 were included in the analysis. Endometrial preparation was conducted with either an AC (N = 1211) or a M-NC (N = 673). The protocol was chosen based on patients’ logistical reasons. The primary outcome was the LBR per transfer. Sub-analyses based on blastocyst quality and day of development were conducted. Birthweight, gestational age, gestational and perinatal issues were secondary outcomes. Participants/materials, setting, methods AC: oral estradiol-valerate 3-times/day from day2–3 of the cycle until the endometrial thickness reached ≥7mm, then 600 mg/day of micronized progesterone. The transfer was conducted on day6 of progesterone administration. M-NC: an intramuscular dose of 10,000IU hCG was administrated when the leading follicle was >17 mm and the endometrium was thicker than 7mm and trilaminar, plus 400 mg/day of micronized-progesterone as luteal phase support starting 36–40hr post-hCG. The transfer was conducted on day7 after trigger. Main results and the role of chance The two groups were similar for maternal age at retrieval (38.0±3.3yr) and transfer (38.3±3.3yr), reproductive history, embryological outcomes of the IVF cycle, body-mass-index, basal hormonal levels, and blastocyst features (Gardner’s classification: AA = 73%, AB/BA=11%, BB/AC/CA=8%, CC/BC/CB=8%; day5=48%, day6=47%, day7=5%). The LBR was 46.7% (N = 565/1211) and 49.9% (N = 336/673) after AC and M-NC, respectively, resulting in an odds-ratio 1.14, 95%CI:0.94–1.37. The absence of significant differences was confirmed also when adjusted for blastocyst quality and day of full-development (1.16, 95%CI:0.96–1.41). Among the 565 and 336 deliveries, the birthweight was similar (3290.3±470.7 versus 3251.7±521.5 g, Mann-Whitney-U-test=0.5), the gestational age was similar (38.5±1.7 versus 38.4±1.9 weeks, Mann-Whitney-U-test=0.5). Also, the rates of newborns who were normal (81% versus 82%), large (8% versus 9%), and small (11% versus 9%) for gestational age were similar (Chi-squared-test=0.5). The rates of patients experiencing gestational (6% versus 7%) and/or perinatal issues (3% versus 3%) were also similar (Fisher’s-exact-tests=0.4). Limitations, reasons for caution This is a retrospective study conducted in poor prognosis patients indicated to preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies. Future randomized controlled trials and cost-effectiveness analysis are desirable, as well as studies in different patient populations. Lastly, each gestational/perinatal issue shall be analyzed per se (e.g. different placentation disorders). Wider implications of the findings: The absence of clinical and perinatal differences between the two protocols for endometrial preparation supports the adoption, whenever needed, of AC. This approach, in fact, allows a higher flexibility in patients’ and daily workload management. Trial registration number None

scholarly journals BLACK RACE RESULTS IN LOWER LIVE BIRTH RATE (LBR) IN FROZEN-THAWED BLASTOCYST TRANSFER CYCLES (FET): AN ANALYSIS OF 7,002 SART FET CYCLES

2020 ◽  
Vol 114 (3) ◽  
pp. e51-e52
Author(s):  
Reeva B. Makhijani ◽  
Alicia Y. Christy ◽  
Prachi N. Godiwala ◽  
Kim L. Thornton ◽  
Daniel R. Grow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Blastocyst Transfer ◽  
Black Race

scholarly journals Parameters impacting the live birth rate per transfer after frozen single euploid blastocyst transfer

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. e0227619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fazilet Kubra Boynukalin ◽  
Meral Gultomruk ◽  
Sabri Cavkaytar ◽  
Emre Turgut ◽  
Necati Findikli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Blastocyst Transfer
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document