scholarly journals Effectiveness of Short-Term Health Coaching on Diabetes Control and Self-Management Efficacy: A Quasi-Experimental Trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruey-Yu Chen ◽  
Li-Chi Huang ◽  
Chien-Tien Su ◽  
Yao-Tsung Chang ◽  
Chia-Lin Chu ◽  
...  
10.2196/14297 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. e14297
Author(s):  
Peter Joseph Jongen ◽  
Gezien ter Veen ◽  
Wim Lemmens ◽  
Rogier Donders ◽  
Esther van Noort ◽  
...  

Background Empowerment helps persons with a chronic disease to self-manage their condition and increase their autonomy and participation. MSmonitor (Curavista bv) is an interactive Web-based program for self-management and multidisciplinary care in multiple sclerosis (MS). It includes, among others, short questionnaires on fatigue (Modified Fatigue Impact Scale-5 [MFIS-5]) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL, Leeds Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life [LMSQoL]); long questionnaires on disabilities, perception of disabilities (Multiple Sclerosis Impact Profile), and HRQoL (Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54); a Medication and Adherence Inventory and an Activity Diary. The combination MFIS-5, LMSQoL, and Medication and Adherence Inventory constitutes the Quick Scan. Objective This study aimed to investigate the short-term effects of MSmonitor on empowerment in patients with MS. Methods We conducted a quasi-experimental study in a general hospital. Of the 180 patients with MS, 125 were eligible, 30 used MSmonitor, and 21 participated in the study (mean age 45.4 years, SD 10.2 years). A total of 24 eligible patients who did not use MSmonitor constituted the control group (mean age 49.3 years, SD 11.4 years). At baseline and at 4 months, we assessed self-efficacy (Multiple Sclerosis Self-Efficacy Scale [MSSES]), participation and autonomy (Impact on Participation and Autonomy [IPA] questionnaire), and self-management (Partners In Health [PIH] questionnaire). Differences between time points and groups were tested with paired t tests and χ² tests. Results In the MSmonitor group, follow-up values remained unchanged for MSSES control (P=.19), MSSES function (P=.62), IPA limitations (P=.26), IPA problems (P=.40), PIH recognition and management of symptoms (P=.52), PIH adherence to treatment (P=.80), and PIH coping (P=.73), whereas the PIH knowledge score had improved (mean 27.8, SD 1.7 vs mean 28.7, SD 2.0; P=.02). The overall utilization rate of the program components was 83% and that of the Quick Scan was 95%. In the control group, all outcomes had remained unchanged. Conclusions The results suggest that for first-time users of the MSmonitor program and their health care providers, it may not be justified to expect a short-term improvement in empowerment in terms of self-efficacy, self-management, autonomy, or participation. Furthermore, a lack of effect on empowerment is not because of nonusage of the program components.


2001 ◽  
Vol 66 (549) ◽  
pp. 169-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koichi WADA ◽  
Shin-ya NISHIMURA ◽  
Kazuya TAKAHASHI ◽  
Bo ZHOU ◽  
Takashi TAKAHASHI

2019 ◽  
Vol 85 ◽  
pp. 16-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tricya Nunes Vieira Bueloni ◽  
Daniel Marchi ◽  
Camille Caetano ◽  
Ricardo de Souza Cavalcante ◽  
Marcela Lara Mendes Amaral ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 009164712110115
Author(s):  
Charissa H. W. Wong ◽  
Li Neng Lee ◽  
Alberto Pérez Pereiro

Short-term Christian overseas volunteer trips, also known as short-term mission trips (STMs), have become increasingly prevalent (Howell & Dorr, 2007). However, research on these programs has been limited. This quasi-experimental study adds to the literature by quantitatively measuring the effects of an STM from Singapore to Thailand. STM recipients’ ( n = 44) self-esteem and readiness for self-directed learning (RSDL) were compared across timepoints – pre-test, post-test, follow-up – and with a control group ( n = 50). It was hypothesized that recipients would experience an increase in self-esteem and RSDL such that their scores would be higher than the control group post-STM. Results provide partial support for the hypotheses; while improvements among recipients were either not significant (for self-esteem) or not long-lasting (for RSDL), recipients had higher scores than the control group post-STM. This suggests that STMs have some, albeit limited, positive effects. Recommendations for promoting greater and longer-lasting effects are offered.


Stroke ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuji Shiga ◽  
Yuhei Kanaya ◽  
Shinichi Takeshima ◽  
Yasunori Fujikawa ◽  
Kazuhiro Takamatsu ◽  
...  

Introduction: Current guidelines set the goal of diabetes control to a glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level of <7% in order to prevent macrovascular events. However, we often experience diabetes patients with cerebral infarction (CI), even though their HbA1c level is well-controlled. A reason for this disparity between the diabetes control status and CI onset may be the limitation of HbA1c as a diabetes control indicator. HbA1c reflects the mean blood glucose level over the past 2-3 months. Therefore, with HbA1c, we cannot evaluate short-term blood glucose control and glycemic variability, which are reported as risk factors for CI. Measurement of 1,5-anhydro-D-glucitol (1,5AG) allows the evaluation of these factors. Hypothesis: 1,5AG can be used to evaluate the risk of CI in patients with well-controlled diabetes. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 1169 patients with diabetes who received treatment for CI at our hospital between 2009 and 2014. These patients were divided into the following two groups according to their HbA1c-based diabetes control status: a CI-low group (HbA1c <7%, n=549) and a CI-high group (HbA1c ≧7%, n=620). We also included a non-CI group of 394 diabetes patients without CI (control group), and these patients were further divided into the following two groups in the same manner: a nonCI-low group (n=199) and a nonCI-high group (n=195). The 1,5AG levels were compared between the CI-low and nonCI-low groups, and the CI-high and nonCI-high groups. Results: There was no difference in the 1,5AG level between the CI-high and nonCI-high groups (8.8±7.3% vs. 8.9±7.1%, p=0.83). However, the 1,5AG level was significantly lower in the CI-low group than in the nonCI-low group (12.5±8.1% vs. 15.2±8.8%, p<0.001). This difference remained significant after adjusting for age and sex. Conclusion: The results of this study show that short-term glycemic control and glycemic variability have a significant relationship with existing CI especially in patients with good diabetes control. The 1,5AG level may be a surrogate measure of the risk of CI in patients with HbA1c levels that indicate good diabetes control.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document