scholarly journals Autonomous Robots for Space: Trajectory Learning and Adaptation Using Imitation

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. B. Ashith Shyam ◽  
Zhou Hao ◽  
Umberto Montanaro ◽  
Shilp Dixit ◽  
Arunkumar Rathinam ◽  
...  

This paper adds on to the on-going efforts to provide more autonomy to space robots and introduces the concept of programming by demonstration or imitation learning for trajectory planning of manipulators on free-floating spacecraft. A redundant 7-DoF robotic arm is mounted on small spacecraft dedicated for debris removal, on-orbit servicing and assembly, autonomous and rendezvous docking. The motion of robot (or manipulator) arm induces reaction forces on the spacecraft and hence its attitude changes prompting the Attitude Determination and Control System (ADCS) to take large corrective action. The method introduced here is capable of finding the trajectory that minimizes the attitudinal changes thereby reducing the load on ADCS. One of the critical elements in spacecraft trajectory planning and control is the power consumption. The approach introduced in this work carry out trajectory learning offline by collecting data from demonstrations and encoding it as a probabilistic distribution of trajectories. The learned trajectory distribution can be used for planning in previously unseen situations by conditioning the probabilistic distribution. Hence almost no power is required for computations after deployment. Sampling from a conditioned distribution provides several possible trajectories from the same start to goal state. To determine the trajectory that minimizes attitudinal changes, a cost term is defined and the trajectory which minimizes this cost is considered the optimal one.

2021 ◽  
Vol 1802 (2) ◽  
pp. 022067
Author(s):  
Xing Zhang ◽  
Hao Kou ◽  
Yi Zhang ◽  
Kaina Jan ◽  
Boris Ivanovic

Author(s):  
Disha Gundecha ◽  
Nishant Gavhane ◽  
Vedant Dubey ◽  
Sahil Joshi ◽  
Pranav Karve ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Javad Sharifi

AbstractMicrowave IQ-mixer controllers are designed for the three approximated Hamiltonians of charge, phase and flux qubits and the controllers are exerted both on approximate and precise quantum system models. The controlled qubits are for the implementation of the two quantum-gates with these three fundamental types of qubits, Quantum NOT-gate and Hadamard-gate. In the charge-qubit, for implementation of both gates, in the approximated and precise model, we observed different controlled trajectories. But fortunately, applying the controller designed for the approximated system over the precise system leads to the passing of the quantum state from the desired state sooner that the expected time. Phase-qubit and flux qubit have similar behaviour under the control system action. In both of them, the implementation of NOT-gate operation led to same trajectories which arrive at final goal state at different times. But in both of those two qubits for implementation of Hadamard-gate, desired trajectory and precise trajectory have some angle of deviation, then by exerting the approximated design controller to precise system, it caused the quantum state to approach the goal state for Hadamard gate implementation, and since the quantum state does not completely reach the goal state, we can not obtain very high gate fidelity.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Travis ◽  
Michael W.R. Alger ◽  
Ijaz Qureshi ◽  
Emily Shepherdson ◽  
Anton de Ruiter

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document