scholarly journals Massive Star Modeling and Nucleosynthesis

Author(s):  
Sylvia Ekström

After a brief introduction to stellar modeling, the main lines of massive star evolution are reviewed, with a focus on the nuclear reactions from which the star gets the needed energy to counterbalance its gravity. The different burning phases are described, as well as the structural impact they have on the star. Some general effects on stellar evolution of uncertainties in the reaction rates are presented, with more precise examples taken from the uncertainties of the 12C(α, γ)16O reaction and the sensitivity of the s-process on many rates. The changes in the evolution of massive stars brought by low or zero metallicity are reviewed. The impact of convection, rotation, mass loss, and binarity on massive star evolution is reviewed, with a focus on the effect they have on the global nucleosynthetic products of the stars.

2003 ◽  
Vol 212 ◽  
pp. 38-46
Author(s):  
Roberta M. Humphreys

Current observations of the S Dor/LBVs and candidates and the implications for their important role in massive star evolution are reviewed. Recent observations of the cool hypergiants are altering our ideas about their evolutionary state, their atmospheres and winds, and the possible mechanisms for their asymmetric high mass loss episodes which may involve surface activity and magnetic fields. Recent results for IRC+10420, ρ Cas and VY CMa are highlighted. S Dor/LBVs in eruption, and the cool hypergiants in their high mass loss phases with their optically thick winds are not what their apparent spectra and temperatures imply; they are then ‘impostors’ on the H-R diagram. The importance of the very most massive stars, like η Carinae and the ‘supernovae impostors’ are also discussed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (S344) ◽  
pp. 153-160
Author(s):  
Sylvia Ekström ◽  
Georges Meynet ◽  
Cyril Georgy ◽  
José Groh ◽  
Arthur Choplin ◽  
...  

AbstractMassive stars are the drivers of the chemical evolution of dwarf galaxies. We review here the basics of massive star evolution and the specificities of stellar evolution in low-Z environment. We discuss nucleosynthetic aspects and what observations could constrain our view on the first generations of stars.


2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (S346) ◽  
pp. 480-485
Author(s):  
Erin R. Higgins ◽  
Jorick S. Vink

AbstractMassive star evolution is dominated by key physical processes such as mass loss, convection and rotation, yet these effects are poorly constrained, even on the main sequence. We utilise a detached, eclipsing binary HD166734 as a testbed for single star evolution to calibrate new MESA stellar evolution grids. We introduce a novel method of comparing theoretical models with observations in the ‘Mass-Luminosity Plane’, as an equivalent to the HRD (see Higgins & Vink 2018). We reproduce stellar parameters and abundances of HD166734 with enhanced overshooting (αov=0.5), mass loss and rotational mixing. When comparing the constraints of our testbed to the systematic grid of models we find that a higher value of αov=0.5 (rather than αov=0.1) results in a solution which is more likely to evolve to a neutron star than a black hole, due to a lower value of the compactness parameter.


2013 ◽  
Vol 769 (1) ◽  
pp. 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher West ◽  
Alexander Heger ◽  
Sam M. Austin

2019 ◽  
Vol 622 ◽  
pp. A50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin R. Higgins ◽  
Jorick S. Vink

Context. Massive star evolution is dominated by various physical effects, including mass loss, overshooting, and rotation, but the prescriptions of their effects are poorly constrained and even affect our understanding of the main sequence. Aims. We aim to constrain massive star evolution models using the unique test-bed eclipsing binary HD 166734 with new grids of MESA stellar evolution models, adopting calibrated prescriptions of overshooting, mass loss, and rotation. Methods. We introduce a novel tool, called the mass-luminosity plane or M−L plane, as an equivalent to the traditional HR diagram, utilising it to reproduce the test-bed binary HD 166734 with newly calibrated MESA stellar evolution models for single stars. Results. We can only reproduce the Galactic binary system with an enhanced amount of core overshooting (αov = 0.5), mass loss, and rotational mixing. We can utilise the gradient in the M−L plane to constrain the amount of mass loss to 0.5–1.5 times the standard prescription test-bed, and we can exclude extreme reduction or multiplication factors. The extent of the vectors in the M−L plane leads us to conclude that the amount of core overshooting is larger than is normally adopted in contemporary massive star evolution models. We furthermore conclude that rotational mixing is mandatory to obtain the correct nitrogen abundance ratios between the primary and secondary components (3:1) in our test-bed binary system. Conclusions. Our calibrated grid of models, alongside our new M−L plane approach, present the possibility of a widened main sequence due to an increased demand for core overshooting. The increased amount of core overshooting is not only needed to explain the extended main sequence, but the enhanced overshooting is also needed to explain the location of the upper-luminosity limit of the red supergiants. Finally, the increased amount of core overshooting has – via the compactness parameter – implications for supernova explodability.


2004 ◽  
Vol 215 ◽  
pp. 500-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
André Maeder ◽  
Georges Meynet

Rotation appears as a dominant effect in massive star evolution. It largely affects all the model outputs: inner structure, tracks, lifetimes, isochrones, surface compositions, blue to red supergiant ratios, etc. At lower metallicities, the effects of rotational mixing are larger; also, more stars may reach critical velocity, even if the initial distribution of rotational velocities is the same.


1986 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 475-479
Author(s):  
André Maeder

Several properties of massive star evolution are of great interest for the understanding of young populations in galaxies: -the genetic connections predicted by the models for the various types of massive stars allow us to understand their filiation; -in order to study the differences of the relative star frequencies in galaxies, we have to know which properties affect the lifetimes in the various evolutionary stages; -the composition of stellar winds is interesting to discuss the wind injections into the interstellar material, particularly the injections by Wolf-Rayet stars, and to discuss the influence of mass loss on nucleosynthesis and chemical yields. Here we shall briefly summarize some recent results on these various problems. For more details the reader may refer to general reviews (cf. Humphreys, 1984; Maeder, 1984a,b; Chiosi and Maeder, 1986).


2008 ◽  
Vol 4 (S252) ◽  
pp. 317-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georges Meynet ◽  
Sylvia Ekström ◽  
Cyril Georgy ◽  
André Maeder ◽  
Raphael Hirschi

AbstractMass loss and axial rotation are playing key roles in shaping the evolution of massive stars. They affect the tracks in the HR diagram, the lifetimes, the surface abundances, the hardness of the radiation field, the chemical yields, the presupernova status, the nature of the remnant, the mechanical energy released in the interstellar medium, etc. . . In this paper, after recalling a few characteristics of mass loss and rotation, we review the effects of these two processes at different metallicities. Rotation probably has its most important effects at low metallicities, while mass loss and rotation deeply affect the evolution of massive stars at solar and higher than solar metallicities.


Author(s):  
Justyn R. Maund ◽  
Paul A. Crowther ◽  
Hans-Thomas Janka ◽  
Norbert Langer

Almost since the beginning, massive stars and their resultant supernovae have played a crucial role in the Universe. These objects produce tremendous amounts of energy and new, heavy elements that enrich galaxies, encourage new stars to form and sculpt the shapes of galaxies that we see today. The end of millions of years of massive star evolution and the beginning of hundreds or thousands of years of supernova evolution are separated by a matter of a few seconds, in which some of the most extreme physics found in the Universe causes the explosive and terminal disruption of the star. Key questions remain unanswered in both the studies of how massive stars evolve and the behaviour of supernovae, and it appears the solutions may not lie on just one side of the explosion or the other or in just the domain of the stellar evolution or the supernova astrophysics communities. The need to view massive star evolution and supernovae as continuous phases in a single narrative motivated the Theo Murphy international scientific meeting ‘Bridging the gap: from massive stars to supernovae’ at Chicheley Hall, UK, in June 2016, with the specific purpose of simultaneously addressing the scientific connections between theoretical and observational studies of massive stars and their supernovae, through engaging astronomers from both communities. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Bridging the gap: from massive stars to supernovae’.


1991 ◽  
Vol 143 ◽  
pp. 445-452
Author(s):  
André Maeder

The results of new grids of models of massive stars with metallicities Z = 0.002, 0.005, 0.020 and 0.040 and mass loss rates depending on Z are shown. When integrated over the mass spectrum, the models enable us to predict number ratios, such as WR/O, WC/WN, WNE/WR, WNL/WR, WCE/WR, WCL/WR, WO/WR as a function of Z in galaxies.Comparisons between models and observations in galaxies are made and show, as was suggested by Maeder, Lequeux and Azzopardi (1980), that the effects of metallicity on the mass loss rates are the prime agent responsible for the different distributions of massive stars in galaxies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document