scholarly journals Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Endovenous 1,940-nm Laser Ablation and Radiofrequency Ablation for Incompetent Saphenous Veins

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Insoo Park ◽  
Sun-Cheol Park
Keyword(s):  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Laser Ablation ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Normal Activity ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Closure Rate ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Saphenous Veins ◽  
Lower Pain

Background: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has shown faster recovery and lower pain scores compared to Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) for treatment of varicose veins. However, a comparison of 1,940-nm EVLA and RFA has not been reported. This study compared short-term outcomes using 1,940-nm EVLA and RFA for varicose veins.Methods: Between April 2018 and June 2018, 43 patients (83 incompetent saphenous veins) were treated with 1,940-nm EVLA and 37 patients (64 incompetent saphenous veins) with RFA. Follow-up duplex was checked at 1 month and 3 months.Results: Baseline characteristics showed no significant differences between both groups except for age. Pain scores at 6 h, and at 1, 10, and 30 days after treatment showed no differences. Complications and time to return to normal activity showed no differences. The 100% closure rate was checked in both groups at 1 month and 3 months follow-up.Conclusion: Short-term outcomes showed no significant differences between 1,940-nm EVLA and RFA treatment.

Recurrence patterns after endovenous laser treatment of saphenous vein reflux

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 496-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald S Winokur ◽  
Neil M Khilnani ◽  
Robert J Min
Keyword(s):  
Laser Ablation ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Endovenous Laser Ablation ◽  
Recurrent Varicose Veins ◽  
Saphenous Veins ◽  
Recurrence Patterns ◽  
Endovenous Laser Treatment ◽  
Saphenofemoral Junction ◽  
Patterns Of Recurrence

Introduction The patterns of recurrent varicose veins after endovascular ablation of the saphenous veins are not well described. Methods The current study describes the ultrasound defined recurrence patterns seen in 58 patients (79 limbs) who returned for evaluation of recurrent varicose veins from a cohort of 802 patients treated with endovenous laser ablation and subsequent sclerotherapy from March 2000 to March 2007 with clinical follow-up until May 2014. Findings The most common ultrasound defined recurrence patterns leading to the varicose veins were new reflux in the anterior accessory saphenous and small saphenous veins as well as recanalization of the treated saphenous segment. Neovascularization at the saphenofemoral junction and incompetent perforating veins as the source of the recurrent veins were not seen. Conclusions The patterns of recurrence following thermal ablation of saphenous veins are different to those seen after surgery. Specifically, new reflux in other saphenous veins is responsible for most recurrent varicose veins and neovascularity seems to be unusual following endovenous laser ablation.

A description of the ‘smile sign’ and multi-pass technique for endovenous laser ablation of large diameter great saphenous veins

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 534-539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma B Dabbs ◽  
Laurensius E Mainsiouw ◽  
Judith M Holdstock ◽  
Barrie A Price ◽  
Mark S Whiteley
Keyword(s):  
Laser Ablation ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Large Diameter ◽  
Diameter Distribution ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Endovenous Laser Ablation ◽  
Saphenous Veins ◽  
Vein Diameter

Aims To report on great saphenous vein diameter distribution of patients undergoing endovenous laser ablation for lower limb varicose veins and the ablation technique for large diameter veins. Methods We collected retrospective data of 1929 (943 left leg and 986 right leg) clinically incompetent great saphenous vein diameters treated with endovenous laser ablation over five years and six months. The technical success of procedure, complications and occlusion rate at short-term follow-up are reported. Upon compression, larger diameter veins may constrict asymmetrically rather than concentrically around the laser fibre (the ‘smile sign’), requiring multiple passes of the laser into each dilated segment to achieve complete ablation. Results Of 1929 great saphenous veins, 334 (17.31%) had a diameter equal to or over 15 mm, which has been recommended as the upper limit for endovenous laser ablation by some clinicians. All were successfully treated and occluded upon short-term follow-up. Conclusion We suggest that incompetent great saphenous veins that need treatment can always be treated with endovenous laser ablation, and open surgery should never be recommended on vein diameter alone.

A multi-institutional review of endovenous thermal ablation of the saphenous vein finds male sex and use of anticoagulation are predictors of long-term failure

2020 ◽  
pp. 026835552097292
Author(s):  
Young Erben ◽  
Isabel Vasquez ◽  
Yupeng Li ◽  
Peter Gloviczki ◽  
Manju Kalra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Closure Rate ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Saphenous Veins ◽  
Occlusion Rate ◽  
Male Sex

Background To review long-term outcomes and saphenous vein (SV) occlusion rate after endovenous ablation (EVA) for symptomatic varicose veins. Methods A review of our EVA database (1998–2018) with at least 3-years of clinical and sonographic follow-up. The primary end point was SV closure rate. Results 542 limbs were evaluated. 358 limbs had radiofrequency and 323 limbs had laser ablations; 542 great saphenous veins (GSV), 106 small saphenous veins (SSV) and 33 anterior accessory saphenous veins (AASV) were treated. Follow-up was 5.6 ± 2.3 years; 508 (74.6%) veins were occluded, 53 (7.8%) partially occluded and 120 (17.6%) were patent. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, male sex (HR 1.6, 95% CI [0.46–018], p = 0.012) and use anticoagulation (HR 2.0, 95% CI [0.69–0.34], p = 0.044) were predictors of long-term failure. On Kaplan-Meier curve, we had an 86.3% occlusion rate. Conclusion Our experience revealed a 5-year closure rate of 86.3%. Ablations have satisfactory occlusion rate.

Endovenous laser ablation of great saphenous veins using a 1470 nm diode laser and the radial fibre – follow-up after six months

2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Pannier ◽  
E Rabe ◽  
J Rits ◽  
A Kadiss ◽  
U Maurins
Keyword(s):  
Laser Ablation ◽  
Diode Laser ◽  
Laser Energy ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Compression Stockings ◽  
Efficient Treatment ◽  
Endovenous Laser Ablation ◽  
Saphenous Veins ◽  
Bare Fibre

Background Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) is an efficient method to treat insufficient great saphenous veins (GSV) with high occlusion rates.1–5 Most studies used 810, 940 or 980 nm diode lasers and a bare fibre.1,2,6 Moderate postoperative pain and bruising are frequent findings.2,6 Laser systems with higher wavelengths like 1470 nm with a higher absorption in water show less pain and bruising after the procedure.7–9 A newly-developed fibre (radial fibre, Biolitec) emits the laser energy radially around the tip directly into the venous wall contrary to the bare fibre.9 The aim of this study was to demonstrate the outcome and side-effects after EVLA of GSV with a 1470 nm diode laser (Ceralas E, Biolitec) by using the radial fibre. Methods Non-randomized, prospective study including 50 unselected limbs of 50 patients with a duplex sonographically verified incompetent GSV. EVLA was performed with a 1470 nm diode laser (Ceralas E, Biolitec) and a radial fibre. In the same session all insufficient tributaries were treated by phlebectomy. Tumescent local anaesthesia with 0.05% lidocaine was applied perivenously. Laser treatment was carried out in a continuous mode with a power of 15 W. Compression stockings (30 mmHg) were applied for one month. Postinterventional checkups took place one, 10, 30 days and six months after the procedure. Results Three patients were lost to follow-up. The average linear endovenous energy density (LEED) was 90.8 J/cm vein (SD 35.3). At the six month follow-up all treated veins remained occluded and no new reflux in the treated segments occurred. No recurrent varicose veins had occurred so far. No severe complications such as deep venous thrombosis could be detected. In four patients at 30 days and three patients at six months local paresthesia occurred in the region of EVLA. Forty-four percent of patients did not have any pain after the treatment and 50% did not take any analgesic tablets at any time after the procedure. Postoperative ecchymoses in the track of the treated GSV was rare. In 80% of the limbs, no ecchymoses was observed after the treatment. Conclusion EVLA of GSV with a radially emitting laser fibre by using a 1470 nm diode laser is a safe and efficient treatment option.

Endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein – Varying energy may not affect outcome

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos S Nejm ◽  
Jorge RR Timi ◽  
Walter Boim de Araújo ◽  
Filipe C Caron
Keyword(s):  
Laser Ablation ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Duplex Ultrasound ◽  
Endovenous Laser Ablation ◽  
Vein Occlusion ◽  
Saphenous Veins ◽  
Occlusion Rate

Objectives To determine great saphenous vein occlusion rate after endovenous laser ablation using the 1470-nm bare-fiber diode laser to supply either 7 W or 15 W and evaluate procedure-related complications. Method Patients with varicose veins of the lower extremities (CEAP class C2–C6) were randomly assigned to undergo either 7-W (18 patients, 30 limbs) or 15-W (18 patients, 30 limbs) endovenous laser ablation. Duplex ultrasound follow-up was at 3–5 days, 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Results Occlusion rate was 100% in both groups at 3–5 days and 1 month and 86.7% in 7-W and 100% in 15-W patients at both 6 and 12 months, with no difference between groups ( p > 0.05). Four (13.3%) 15-W and 3 (10%) 7-W patients had paresthesia at 3–5 days, with no difference between groups ( p > 0.05). Conclusions These preliminary data suggest that both techniques are similarly effective in the treatment of varicose great saphenous veins.

VNUS Closure radiofrequency ablation of varicose veins

Phlebologie ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 39 (02) ◽  
pp. 61-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Böhme ◽  
M. Kensy ◽  
J. Alm
Keyword(s):  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Primary Closure ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Single Shot ◽  
Closure Rate ◽  
Fast System ◽  
Saphenous Veins ◽  
One Year

SummaryEndovenous procedures are increasingly being used to eliminate epifascial variose veins. The radiofrequency therapies VNUS Closure and VNUS Closure FAST Catheter have established themselves and boast very good results compared to other endovenous procedures with regard to closure rates and postoperative quality of life. Equipment and method: Between February 2005 and December 2009, a total of 2413 patients comprising 3366 great and small saphenous veins were operated upon at the Vascular and Venous Diseases Department of DERMATOLOGIKUM HAMBURG. 2241 great and small saphenous veins were treated with the VNUS Closure FAST catheter, 1125 great and small saphenous veins were treated with the Closure PLUS catheter system. Additionally, 264 recurrent varicose veins were treated with the Closure FAST system. Ultrasound examinations were conducted 7 days after the treatment, again 6 weeks after the treatment, and at the follow-up examination one year after treatment. Any recanalisations were treated immediately. Between January 2007 and January 2009, 57 patients were also treated for perforant veins between stages C-4 and C-6. Gender and age distributions, as well as CEAP classifications corresponded to standard distributions. Compression stockings were only administered in the case of advanced chronic venous insufficiency (C-4 to C-6). The patients were anticoagulated before treatment by means of a low molecular weight heparin as a single shot prophylactic. Anticoagulation through thrombocyte aggregation inhibitors or dicumarin was continued. Results: 1089 great and small saphenous veins were examined after removal with Closure PLUS radiofrequency therapy. The primary closure rate after 6 weeks was 98.9%; after one year, 91.2%; after two years 99.0%; after three years, 98.2%; and after four years, 100%. 2241 great and small saphenous veins were treated with the VNUS Closure FAST Radiofrequency System. 2096 great and small saphenous veins were examined after treatment. The primary closure rate after 7 days was 99.7%; after 6 weeks, 99.6%; after one year, 98.8%; and after two years, 100%. The rate of minor complications after Closure FAST Radiofrequency catheter treatment of the great saphenous vein was 5.3%; after treatment of the small saphenous vein, 5.9% in total. No major complications – such as deep vein thromboses or pulmonary embolisms – were caused, and neither was burning of the skin. The closure rate one week after RFS treatment was 84.6%; after 6 weeks, 86.2%; and after one year, 78.3%. In all of the recurring varicose veins, the recirculation was successfully eliminated. Conclusion: The VNUS Closure FAST Radiofrequency catheter represents a standardised, established procedure for treating epifascial varicose veins to ensure the certain elimination of recirculation. The development of Closure PLUS 6-French and 8-French catheter into Closure FAST Radiofrequency catheter has led not only to a reduced operation duration but also a safe and high closure rate after follow-up. With the new concept of segmental ablation the Closure FAST system eliminates the catheter pullback variability and standardises and simplifies the procedure. The success of the treatment is shown by the complete decomposition of the vein underneath the inflow of the superficial epigastric vein or the inflow of the gastrocnemic veins. However, the long term results for the Closure FAST system are awaited eagerly. The current high closure rates and high patient satisfaction rates give us cause to look ahead with hope.

scholarly journals Total versus hemiarthroplasty for glenohumeral arthritis according to preoperative glenoid erosion

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc-Frederic Pastor ◽  
Melena Kaufmann ◽  
Andre Gettmann ◽  
Mathias Wellmann ◽  
Tomas Smith
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Internal Rotation ◽  
Constant Score ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Simple Shoulder Test ◽  
Lower Pain ◽  
Glenoid Erosion

Clinical studies on primary osteoarthritis have shown better results of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) compared to hemiarthroplasty (HA) regarding the function, revision rate and postoperative pain relief. However, a clear recommendation for implantation of TSA or HA, depending on the glenoid type of erosion, does not exist. The aim of the study was to compare the results of TSA and HA with respect to the preoperative glenoid type. In this study, 41 patients were examined retrospectively; among them, 25 patients were treated with stemmed anatomic TSA and 16 with stemmed anatomic HA. The degree of osteoarthritis was determined according to Samilson and the glenoid erosion was classified according to Walch. The clinical outcome of the patients was determined by using the Constant Score (CS) and the Simple Shoulder Test at final follow-up. Patients after TSA demonstrated a significantly improved internal rotation compared to HA patients. Patients with preoperative B1 glenoid showed better pain relief after TSA compared to HA. For patients with preoperative type A2 glenoid a significantly higher CS was found after TSA compared to HA. We were able to show good short-term results after TSA and HA. Our findings suggest a better internal rotation for TSA compared to HA, superior clinical outcome for patients with preoperative A2 glenoid and lower pain level for patients with a preoperative B1 glenoid. However, these results need to be confirmed by further studies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document