scholarly journals Treatment Outcomes and the Safety of Chemoradiotherapy With High-Dose CDDP for Elderly Patients With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jo Omata ◽  
Yushi Ueki ◽  
Takeshi Takahashi ◽  
Ryusuke Shodo ◽  
Keisuke Yamazaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Elderly Group ◽  
Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
High Dose

Objective: We aimed to compare the outcomes and safety of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) between elderly and non-elderly patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). It is difficult to assess the causal effect of age because of possible differences in general conditions among individuals. Therefore, we adjusted the background factors of elderly and non-elderly patients using propensity score matching (PSM).Methods: A total of 146 patients with HNSCC who received CRT were divided into an elderly (≥70 years, n = 35) and non-elderly group (<70 years, n = 111). Pre-treatment characteristics, including the performance status, Charlson comorbidity index, body mass index, primary site, and TNM stage were adjusted by PSM. We compared the outcomes and safety of CRT with high-dose single-agent cisplatin (CDDP) as well as outcomes following recurrence between the groups, before and after PSM.Results: The total dose of CDDP administered during CRT was significantly lower in the elderly group before PSM. However, it became comparable to the non-elderly group and adverse events did not differ between the groups following PSM, resulting in a comparable CRT completion rate. Overall-, disease specific-, and progression-free survivals of elderly patients were comparable to those of non-elderly patients following PSM. In contrast, elderly patients with recurrence could receive fewer salvage treatments than their non-elderly counterparts, resulting in worse survival.Conclusions: CRT with high-dose CDDP is safe and effective for the treatment of elderly patients with HNSCC. However, salvage treatments can be rarely conducted for elderly patients with a recurrence, considering a deterioration of their general condition.

scholarly journals Tegafur-Uracil versus 5-Fluorouracil in Combination with Cisplatin and Cetuximab in Elderly Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 1011
Author(s):  
Meng-Che Hsieh ◽  
Chih-Chun Wang ◽  
Chuan-Chien Yang ◽  
Ching-Feng Lien ◽  
Chien-Chung Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Propensity Score Matching Analysis

There are increasing incidences of elderly patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). However, the treatment is not yet established. We conducted a propensity score matching analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tegafur–uracil versus 5-fluorouracil in combination with cisplatin plus cetuximab in elderly patients with R/M HNSCC. Elderly patients with R/M HNSCC treated with cetuximab-containing chemotherapy were recruited into this study. In order to reduce the selection bias, propensity score matching was performed. Kaplan–Meier curves were plotted for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Toxicities were graded according to the National Cancer Institute’s Common Terminology Criteria V3.0. After propensity sore matching, 54 patients with tegafur–uracil, cisplatin plus cetuximab (UPEx), and 54 patients with 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin plus cetuximab (EXTREME) were identified. The median PFS was 5.4 months in UPEx and 5.8 months in EXTREME (p = 0.451). The median OS was 10.8 months in UPEx and 10.2 months in EXTREME (p = 0.807). The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were insignificant in both arms, accounting for 61% versus 59% (p = 0.680) and 72% versus 70% (p = 0.732) in the UPEx arm and the EXTREME arm, respectively. A multivariate analysis showed that age and ECOG PS were, independently, predictors. Grade 3/4 adverse events were much fewer in UPEx than in EXTREME (p < 0.001). Both cetuximab-containing chemotherapies are effective in elderly patients with R/M HNSCC. Safety profiles are improved when tegafur–uracil is substituted for 5-fluorouracil. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate our conclusions.

8532 Prognostic impact of comorbidity in elderly patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 480
Author(s):  
M.A. Moreno Jimenez ◽  
I. Gonzalez Cebrian ◽  
R. Collado Martin ◽  
B. Medina Magan ◽  
A.L. Ortega Granados ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Prognostic Impact

The impact of radiotherapy, in addition to chemotherapy, on overall survival in the initial management of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6035-6035
Author(s):  
Sujith Baliga ◽  
Rafi Kabarriti ◽  
Nitin Ohri ◽  
Chandan Guha ◽  
Shalom Kalnicki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Prolonged Survival ◽  
Newly Diagnosed

6035 Background: The role of radiation therapy (RT) in the upfront management of patients with metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is not clearly defined. In this study, we used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to assess the association between RT use and overall survival (OS) for patients with metastatic HNSCC who received chemotherapy. Methods: We analyzed the NCDB to identify patients with newly diagnosed metastatic HNSCC from 2004-2013 who were treated with upfront chemotherapy. Associations between the use of RT and OS were evaluated using the Kaplan Meier method, univariate and multivariate cox regression, propensity score matching, and sequential landmark analysis. Survival outcomes were also compared for patients receiving a biologically effective dose (BED) ≥72 Gy10 and < 72 Gy10. Results: We identified 3,516 patients diagnosed with metastatic HNSCC who were treated with chemotherapy, of which 2,288 (65%) were also treated with RT. The median follow up was 11.9 months. The addition of RT to chemotherapy was associated with prolonged survival (median 13.6 v 11.3 months, logrank p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, the use of RT remained associated with prolonged survival (HR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.61-0.82, p < 0.001). After propensity score matching, the addition of RT was associated with improved median survival (13.5 v 11.2 months) and 5-year (17% v 7%) OS compared to chemotherapy alone (log rank, p < 0·001). Landmark analyses limited to patients who survived at least 3, 6, and 12 months after diagnosis continued to demonstrate improved OS with the addition of RT. Among patients treated with RT, the use of RT schedules with a BED exceeding 72 Gy10 was associated with prolonged survival (median 18.0 versus 11.7 months, logrank p < 0.001). Conclusions: For patients with metastatic HNSCC, the addition of RT to chemotherapy was associated with improved OS in this population based study. These results provide rationale for prospective randomized trials to validate these findings and to determine the optimal radiation therapy dose/fractionation and treatment schedule for these patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document