scholarly journals Myocardial Infarction Quantification from Late Gadolinium Enhancement MRI Using Top-Hat Transforms and Neural Networks

Algorithms ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. 249
Author(s):  
Ezequiel de la Rosa ◽  
Désiré Sidibé ◽  
Thomas Decourselle ◽  
Thibault Leclercq ◽  
Alexandre Cochet ◽  
...  

Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) MRI is the gold standard technique for myocardial viability assessment. Although the technique accurately reflects the damaged tissue, there is no clinical standard to quantify myocardial infarction (MI). Moreover, commercial software used in clinical practice are mostly semi-automatic, and hence require direct intervention of experts. In this work, a new automatic method for MI quantification from LGE-MRI is proposed. Our novel segmentation approach is devised for accurately detecting not only hyper-enhanced lesions, but also microvascular obstruction areas. Moreover, it includes a myocardial disease detection step which extends the algorithm for working under healthy scans. The method is based on a cascade approach where firstly, diseased slices are identified by a convolutional neural network (CNN). Secondly, by means of morphological operations a fast coarse scar segmentation is obtained. Thirdly, the segmentation is refined by a boundary-voxel reclassification strategy using an ensemble of very light CNNs. We tested the method on a LGE-MRI database with healthy (n = 20) and diseased (n = 80) cases following a 5-fold cross-validation scheme. Our approach segmented myocardial scars with an average Dice coefficient of 77.22 ± 14.3% and with a volumetric error of 1.0 ± 6.9 cm3. In a comparison against nine reference algorithms, the proposed method achieved the highest agreement in volumetric scar quantification with the expert delineations (p< 0.001 when compared to the other approaches). Moreover, it was able to reproduce the scar segmentation intra- and inter-rater variability. Our approach was shown to be a good first attempt towards automatic and accurate myocardial scar segmentation, although validation over larger LGE-MRI databases is needed.

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Chaowu ◽  
Li Li ◽  
Fang Wei ◽  
Li Hua ◽  
Wang Yang

Introduction: Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) has the potential to become an excellent technique in the diagnosis of right ventricular myocardial infarction (RVMI). However, the gold standard, pathological findings from patients, is still unavailable to validate the true value of LGE. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that LGE might correspond with histological infarction in RVMI. Methods: 36 transplant candidates (35 M /1F) with chronic ischemic heart disease were studied prospectively with LGE. According to the 12-segment-model, the pathological findings of RV were compared with the previous in vivo LGE after heart transplantation. Results: Histological RVMI was detected in 7 patients, and corresponded with all LGE segments (n=23) and 2 non-LGE segments. A generalize linear mix effect model showed non-significant difference (P=0.152) between the results of LGE and histological infraction. In identifying the RV segments with histological infarction, sensitivity and specificity of LGE was 92.0% (95%CI 74.0% to 99.0%) and 100% (95%CI 99.9% to 100.0%), respectively. Furthermore, RV segments without LGE mainly included two pathological patterns: histologically normal myocardium (n=372) or the admixture of viable myocardium and scattered replacement fibrosis (n=35). In the non-LGE RV segments, wall motion abnormality was associated with volume fraction of collagen (11.4±6.5% vs 4.3±2.2%, P<0.001) and the presence of ischemia (96.4% vs 1.7%, P<0.001). Conclusions: The RV segments with LGE corresponded closely with histological infarction in ischemic heart disease. However, RV segments without LGE might be histologically normal myocardium or intermixed with scattered replacement fibrosis. Further studies are required to evaluate the significance of scattered replacement fibrosis in the non-LGE segments.


2007 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 653-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Klein ◽  
Thaiz R. Schmal ◽  
Stephan G. Nekolla ◽  
Bernhard Schnackenburg ◽  
Eckart Fleck ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 1135-1148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre-Francois Lintingre ◽  
Hubert Nivet ◽  
Stéphanie Clément-Guinaudeau ◽  
Claudia Camaioni ◽  
Soumaya Sridi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document