scholarly journals Lung Ultrasound Imaging, a Technical Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Libertario Demi ◽  
Thomas Egan ◽  
Marie Muller

Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a growing and fascinating field of application for ultrasound imaging. Despite the difficulties in imaging an organ largely filled with air, the potential benefits originating from an effective ultrasound method focusing on monitoring and diagnosing lung diseases represent a tremendous stimulus for research in this direction. This paper presents a technical review where, after a brief historical overview, the current limitations of LUS imaging are discussed together with a description of the physical phenomena at stake. Next, the paper focuses on the latest technical developments of LUS.

Author(s):  
N Buda ◽  
M Piskunowicz ◽  
M Porzezińska ◽  
W Kosiak ◽  
Z Zdrojewski

Author(s):  
Eugene Yuriditsky ◽  
James M. Horowitz ◽  
Nova L. Panebianco ◽  
Harald Sauthoff ◽  
Muhamed Saric

2020 ◽  
Vol 148 (4) ◽  
pp. 2692-2692
Author(s):  
Federico Mento ◽  
Gino Soldati ◽  
Renato Prediletto ◽  
Marcello Demi ◽  
Libertario Demi

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nga Wing Tsai ◽  
Chun Wai Ngai ◽  
Ka Leung Mok ◽  
James W Tsung

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 5-18
Author(s):  
S. S. Petrikov ◽  
I. E. Popova ◽  
V. M. Abuchina ◽  
R. Sh. Muslimov ◽  
L. T. Khamidova ◽  
...  

Lung ultrasound demonstrates a high diagnostic value in the assessment of lung diseases.Aim. To determine the diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound compared to chest computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of lung changes in COVID-19. Materials and methods. The retrospective study included 45 patients (28 men) aged 37 to 90 years who underwent polypositional lung ultrasound with an assessment of 14 zones. The study compared lung echograms with chest CT data in assessing the prevalence of the process and the nature of structural changes. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of lung ultrasound in comparison with CT scans were determined, 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.Results. In 44 patients (98%), CT revealed pathological changes with subpleural localization in both lungs. Of these, in 30 cases, the inflammation was limited only to the subpleural parts, and in 14 cases, the changes spread to the basal parts of the lungs, while ultrasound revealed changes at the depth of the lesion no more than 4 cm. The lesion of 10–11 zones according to lung ultrasound corresponds to CT 1–2 degrees, the lesion of 13–14 zones — CT 3–4 degrees. The sensitivity of ultrasound to detect lung changes of various types was ≥ 92%. The highest sensitivity of 97.9% (95% CI: 92.8–99.8%) was determined for small consolidations on the background of interstitial changes (degree 1A+, 1B+), which corresponded to “crazy-paving” pattern on CT. The specificity depended on the nature of the changes and varied from 46.7 to 70.0%. Diagnostic accuracy was ≥ 81%, the maximum values of 90.6% (95% CI: 85.6–94.2%) were obtained for moderate interstitial changes (grade 1A) corresponding to ground-glass opacity (type one) according to CT data.Conclusion. The sensitivity of ultrasound to detect lung changes in COVID-19 is more than 90%. Lung ultrasound has some limitations: inability to determine the prevalence of the process clearly and identify centrally located areas of changes in the lung tissue.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document