scholarly journals Implementing Ethical, Legal, and Societal Considerations in Wearable Robot Design

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (15) ◽  
pp. 6705
Author(s):  
Alexandra Kapeller ◽  
Heike Felzmann ◽  
Eduard Fosch-Villaronga ◽  
Kostas Nizamis ◽  
Ann-Marie Hughes

Ethical, legal and societal implications (ELSI) in the development of wearable robots (WRs) are currently not explicitly addressed in most guidelines for WR developers. Previous work has identified ELSI related to WRs, e.g., impacts on body and identity, ableism, data protection, control and responsibilities, but translation of these concerns into actionable recommendations remains outstanding. This paper provides practical guidance for the implementation of ELSI in WR design, development and use. First, we identify the need for domain-specific recommendations against the context of current ELSI guidance. We then demonstrate the feasibility and usefulness of taking a domain-specific approach by successively transforming currently identified ELSI into an action-guiding flowchart for integration of ELSI specific to the different stages of WR development. This flowchart identifies specific questions to be considered by WR development teams and suggests actions to be taken in response. By tailoring ELSI guidance to WR developers, centring it on user needs, their relation to others and wider society, and being cognizant of existing legislation and values, we hope to help the community develop better WRs that are safer, have greater usability, and which impact positively on society.

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 20-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nerissa Campbell ◽  
Casey Gray ◽  
Louise Foley ◽  
Ralph Maddison ◽  
Harry Prapavessis

Author(s):  
Hassan Chafi ◽  
Arvind K. Sujeeth ◽  
Kevin J. Brown ◽  
HyoukJoong Lee ◽  
Anand R. Atreya ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 2423-2437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anam Nazir ◽  
Masoom Alam ◽  
Saif U. R. Malik ◽  
Adnan Akhunzada ◽  
Muhammad Nadeem Cheema ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 1337-1355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Wempe

Contractarian business ethics (CBE) is in great vogue in the present study of corporate morality. Its stated ambition is to provide better practical guidance than the more general ethical theories of business ethics, such as Kantianism, pragmatism, utilitarianism, virtue ethics or the stakeholder model. But how good is this new trend in business ethics theorizing? This article aims to assess CBE's credentials as a social contract argument. For this purpose, it embarks on a comparative analysis of the use of the social contract model in two earlier domains: political authority and social justice. Building on this comparison, it then develops four criteria for any future CBE. To apply the social contract model properly to the domain of corporate morality, it should be: (1) self-disciplined, i.e. not aspire to results beyond what the contract model can realistically establish; (2) argumentative, i.e. provide principles that are demonstrative results of the contractarian method; (3) task-directed, i.e. it should be clear what the social contract thought-experiment is intended to model; and (4) domain-specific, i.e. the contractarian choice situation should be tailored to the defining problems of corporate morality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document