scholarly journals Radiotherapy with Intensity-Modulated (IMRT) Techniques in the Treatment of Anal Carcinoma (RAINSTORM): A Multicenter Study on Behalf of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology) Gastrointestinal Study Group

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1902
Author(s):  
Luciana Caravatta ◽  
Giovanna Mantello ◽  
Francesca Valvo ◽  
Pierfrancesco Franco ◽  
Lucrezia Gasparini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Anal Cancer ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Histological Grade ◽  
Anal Carcinoma ◽  
Nodal Involvement ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Intensity Modulated ◽  
Grade 3

A multi-institutional retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the pattern of care and clinical outcomes of anal cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques. In a cohort of 987 patients, the clinical complete response (CR) rate (beyond 6 months) was 90.6%. The 3-year local control (LC) rate was 85.8% (95% CI: 84.4–87.2), and the 3-year colostomy-free survival (CFS) rate was 77.9% (95% CI: 76.1–79.8). Three-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 80.2% and 88.1% (95% CI: 78.8–89.4) (95% CI: 78.5–81.9), respectively. Histological grade 3 and nodal involvement were associated with lower CR (p = 0.030 and p = 0.004, respectively). A statistically significant association was found between advanced stage and nodal involvement, and LC, CFS, PFS, OS and event-free survival (EFS). Overall treatment time (OTT) ≥45 days showed a trend for a lower PFS (p = 0.050) and was significantly associated with lower EFS (p = 0.030) and histological grade 3 with a lower LC (p = 0.025). No statistically significant association was found between total dose, dose/fraction and/or boost modality and clinical outcomes. This analysis reports excellent clinical results and a mild toxicity profile, confirming IMRT techniques as standard of care for the curative treatment of anal cancer patients. Lymph node involvement and histological grade have been confirmed as the most important negative prognostic factors.

Does gap-free intensity modulated chemoradiation therapy provide a greater clinical benefit than 3D conformal chemoradiation in patients with anal cancer?

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 584-584
Author(s):  
Claire Dewas-Vautravers ◽  
Philippe Maingon ◽  
Cecile Dalban ◽  
Aurelie Petitfils ◽  
Karine Peignaux-Casasnovas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anal Cancer ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Anal Carcinoma ◽  
Late Toxicity ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Concomitant Chemotherapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Intensity Modulated ◽  
3D Crt

584 Background: Chemoradiation is the standard treatment for anal cancer. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes and toxicities in patients treated with either intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). Methods: Between 2004 and 2011, the data of 51 patients treated with exclusive radiotherapy with or without concomitant chemotherapy for non-metastatic anal carcinoma were retrospectively analyzed. Thirty-nine patients (76.5%) had concomitant chemotherapy: capecitabine alone (1), MMC combined with 5FU or capecitabine (36), MMC and CDDP (4). Twenty-seven patients were treated with 3D-CRT and 24 patients with IMRT, with a median dose delivered to the tumor of 59.4Gy [30.6-66.6], whatever the radiotherapy technique (p= 0.99). The median follow-up was 40 months [26.4-51.6]. Results: Median duration of the treatment was 56 days [22-103] (59 versus 47 days with 3D-CRT and IMRT respectively, p= 0.0007). A gap was planned in 29 patients (57%), 23 with 3D-CRT and 6 with IMRT (p< 0.0001). Treatment was stopped for toxicity in 9 patients (17.6%), 4 with 3D-CRT and 5 with IMRT (p= 0.48). There was no difference between the two groups for response to treatment (p= 0.46). Two-year overall survival (OS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRS) and colostomy-free survival (CFS) rates were 88.5%, 63% and 60.3%, respectively for the IMRT group and 81%, 76.5% and 81.1% for the 3D-CRT group (all NS). Ten patients (37%) in 3D-CRT and 11 patients (45.8%) in IMRT (p= 0.524) had grade 3 (G3) acute toxicity. No grade 4 (G4) toxicity occurred. Conclusions: Our study suggests that further investigations concerning the use of IMRT to treat cancer of the anus are warranted. IMRT makes it possible to reduce treatment time, notably by abandoning the gap, but with no impact on the prognosis. Nonetheless, a longer follow-up is essential to determine whether or not IMRT has an impact on late toxicity, local control and survival compared with conventional 3D-CRT.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus 3D conformal radiation therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 494-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Chuong ◽  
Jessica Freilich ◽  
Sarah Hoffe ◽  
William J. Fulp ◽  
Jill Weber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Anal Cancer ◽  
Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Conformal Radiation Therapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Intensity Modulated ◽  
3D Conformal Radiation Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

494 Background: The emergence of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in the treatment of anal cancer has dramatically lowered the incidence of severe toxicity while maintaining excellent long-term outcomes. We compared our institutional experience using 3D conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) versus IMRT for anal cancer. Methods: We performed a single-institution retrospective review of all non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma anal cancer patients treated between 2000-2011 using definitive chemoradiation with curative intent. Results: This study included 89 consecutive anal cancer patients (37 3DCRT, 52 IMRT). Median follow-up for all patients, IMRT patients alone, and CRT patients alone was 26.5 months (range, 3.5-133.6), 20 months (range, 3.5-125.5), and 61.9 months (range, 7.6-133.6), respectively. Three-year overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), locoregional control (LRC), and colostomy free survival (CFS) were 91.1%, 82.3%, 90.8%, and 91.3% in the IMRT cohort and 86.1%, 72.5%, 91.9%, and 93.7% for the 3DCRT patients (all p>0.1). More patients in the 3DCRT group required a treatment break (11 vs. 4; p=0.006), although the difference in median treatment break duration was not significant (12.2 vs. 8.0 days; p=0.35). Survival outcomes did not differ based on whether a treatment break was required (all p>0.1). Acute grade ≥3 non-hematologic toxicity was significantly decreased in the IMRT cohort (21.1 vs. 59.5%; p<0.0001). Acute grade ≥3 skin toxicity was significantly worse in the 3DCRT group (p<0.0001) while an improvement in late grade ≥3 GI toxicity was observed in the IMRT patients (p=0.012). Conclusions: This is the largest retrospective review comparing 3DCRT and IMRT for definitive treatment of anal cancer. In contrast to previously published data, this study demonstrates that while long-term outcomes do not significantly differ based on RT technique, a marked decrease in adverse effects and the need for a treatment break can be achieved using IMRT.

scholarly journals Toxicity and survival of anal cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy

2019 ◽  
Vol 101 (3) ◽  
pp. 168-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Ghareeb ◽  
K Paramasevon ◽  
P Mokool ◽  
H van der Voet ◽  
M Jha
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Anal Cancer ◽  
Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Conventional Radiotherapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
James Cook ◽  
Intensity Modulated

Introduction The definitive treatment of anal cancer with chemoradiotherapy spares abdominoperineal resection for salvage treatment but carries a high burden of toxicity. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy has been implemented to reduce toxicity, reduce treatment breaks and improve survival. However, large and long-term studies are lacking. We aimed to investigate the toxicities and long-term survival of anal cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy at James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough. Materials and methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients with squamous cell anal cancer treated at James Cook University Hospital between July 2010 and April 2017. All patients were uniformly treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy-based chemoradiation with curative intent. A subset of these patients was followed-up prospectively by an oncologist for acute and late toxicity. We calculated Kaplan–Meier estimates of survival statistics and compared our results with those of previous trials which used conventional radiotherapy. Results We studied 132 patients, including a toxicity subset of 64, for a median follow-up time of 43 months (range 3–84 months). Eleven patients (8.3%) underwent salvage abdominoperineal resection. Grade 3+ acute non-haematological, gastrointestinal, genitourinary and dermatological toxicity were found in 56.2%, 12.3%, 0% and 50.7% of the toxicity subset (n = 64). Median treatment duration was 37 days. Overall and colostomy-free survival at five years were 68.3% and 85.3%, respectively. Tumour size (P = 0.006) and age (P = 0.002) predicted shorter overall survival. Conclusions Intensity-modulated radiation therapy probably reduces acute gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity compared with conventional radiotherapy, while resulting in similar overall and colostomy-free survival. We suggest that further dose escalation may improve survival in patients with T3/T4 tumours.

Outcomes and Colostomy-Free Survival in Anal Cancer Patients Treated in a Community Setting

2010 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. S330
Author(s):  
D. Dosoretz ◽  
C. Mantz ◽  
S. Salenius ◽  
A. Fox ◽  
R. Ross ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Anal Cancer ◽  
Community Setting ◽  
Free Survival

scholarly journals The association between protease inhibitors and anal cancer outcomes in veterans living with HIV treated with definitive chemoradiation: a retrospective study

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison K. Yoder ◽  
David S. Lakomy ◽  
Yongquan Dong ◽  
Suchismita Raychaudhury ◽  
Kathryn Royse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protease Inhibitor ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Protease Inhibitors ◽  
Anal Cancer ◽  
Anal Carcinoma ◽  
People Living With Hiv ◽  
Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Living With Hiv

Abstract Background The incidence of anal squamous cell carcinoma has been increasing, particularly in people living with HIV (PLWH). There is concern that radiosensitizing drugs, such as protease inhibitors, commonly used in the management of HIV, may increase toxicities in patients undergoing chemoradiation. This study examines treatment outcomes and toxicities in PLWH managed with and without protease inhibitors who are receiving chemoradiation for anal cancer. Methods Patient demographic, HIV management, and cancer treatment information were extracted from multiple Veterans Affairs databases. Patients were also manually chart reviewed. Among PLWH undergoing chemoradiation for anal carcinoma, therapy outcomes and toxicities were compared between those treated with and without protease inhibitors at time of cancer treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square, Cox regression analysis, and logistic regression. Results A total of 219 PLWH taking anti-retroviral therapy undergoing chemoradiation for anal cancer were identified and included in the final analysis. The use of protease inhibitors was not associated with any survival outcome including colostomy-free survival, progression-free survival, or overall survival (all adjusted hazard ratio p-values> 0.05). Regarding toxicity, protease inhibitor use was not associated with an increased odds of hospitalizations or non-hematologic toxicities; however, protease inhibitor use was associated with increased hospitalizations for hematologic toxicities, including febrile neutropenia (p < 0.01). Conclusion The use of protease inhibitors during chemoradiation for anal carcinoma was not associated with any clinical outcome or increase in non-hematologic toxicity. Their use was associated with increased hospitalizations for hematologic toxicities. Further prospective research is needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of protease inhibitors for patients undergoing chemoradiation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document