Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges in a Patient with Synchronous Very High-Risk Prostate Adenocarcinoma and Anal Carcinoma

A 79-year-old HIV-negative Caucasian man with a medical history of smoking 20 pack-years (quit 40 years prior), early-stage non-small cell lung cancer status post-lobectomy 13 years earlier at an outside hospital without evidence of recurrence, and benign prostatic hypertrophy was diagnosed with synchronous very high-risk prostate adenocarcinoma and early-stage anal basaloid squamous cell carcinoma. He proceeded to undergo concurrent treatment for these tumors, consisting of androgen deprivation therapy, external beam radiation therapy, and a brachytherapy boost for the prostate adenocarcinoma; for the anal carcinoma, he was treated with definitive chemoradiation. Over 3.5 years since the completion of radiotherapy, he remains in clinical and biochemical remission.

Incidence and clearance of anal high-risk Human Papillomavirus infection and their risk factors in men who have sex with men living with HIV

HIV-infected men who have sex with men (MSM) display the highest prevalence of anal infection by high-risk Human Papillomaviruses (hrHPVs) and incidence of anal carcinoma. Anal specimens were genotyped by the Linear Array. Incidence and clearance of anal infection by hrHPVs, hrHPVs other than HPV16, low-risk HPVs, and four individual types (6,11,16,18) were estimated using a two-state Markov model. Determinants for incidence and clearance were assessed by logistic regression. Overall, 204 individuals were included (median age 42 years, IQR = 34–49). For hrHPVs, incidence and clearance rates were 36.1 × 1000 person-months (p-m) (95% CI 23.3–56.5) and 15.6 × 1000 p-m (95% CI 10.7–23.3), respectively. HPV16 showed a higher incidence than HPV18 (10.2 vs. 7.2 × 1000 p-m). Its clearance was more than twofold lower than that of HPV18 (30.1 vs. 78.2 × 1000 p-m). MSM receiving cART displayed a 68% to 88% decrease in risk of acquiring hrHPVs, hrHPVs other than HPV16, HPV16, and HPV18 (adjusted Hazard Ratio [aHR] 0.13, 95% CI 0.02–0.67; aHR 0.22, 95% CI 0.06–0.78; aHR 0.32, 95% CI 0.12–0.90; aHR 0.12, 95% CI 0.04–0.31, respectively) than patients not treated. A nadir CD4 + count < 200 cells/mm3 significantly reduced the clearance of hrHPVs other than HPV16 (aHR 0.39, 95% CI 0.17–0.90). cART use reduces the risk of acquiring anal infection by hrHPVs.

Rectal Phenotype of Perianal Paget Disease: Rare Concomitant Phenomena

Aim: Classically, ‘Paget disease’ refers to a distinct histological pattern in breast carcinoma. Here, we review the clinicopathological features of anorectal adenocarcinoma with ‘pagetoid’ spread. Materials and Methods: Histological and immunohistochemical records for 11 cases of anorectal adenocarcinoma with pagetoid spread among 958 Japanese patients with primary rectal/anal carcinoma were reviewed. Results: Grossly, nine of 11 cases had areas of invasive carcinoma: Tubular adenocarcinoma in eight and neuroendocrine carcinoma in one. Pagetoid components were positive for cytokeratin 7 in eight cases, cytokeratin 20 and caudal type homeobox 2 in all 11 cases, and p63 in one case, but were negative for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), gross cystic disease fluid protein-15, and GATA binding protein 3. Conclusion: The prevalence of perianal Paget disease in this series was 1.1%, with two cases of genuine perianal Paget disease with a rectal phenotype without invasive carcinoma. The rectal phenotype of perianal Paget disease may not be associated with HER2 overexpression.

Randomized phase II trial of avelumab alone or in combination with cetuximab for patients with previously treated, locally advanced, or metastatic squamous cell anal carcinoma: the CARACAS study

BackgroundNo standard therapies beyond first line are established for advanced squamous cell anal carcinoma (aSCAC). Earlier preliminary data suggest activity of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibition and programmed cell death ligand (PD-(L))1 blockade in patients with previously treated disease. Aim of this study was to explore activity and safety of avelumab with/without cetuximab in patients with aSCAC.MethodsIn this open-label, non-comparative, ‘pick the winner’, multicenter randomized phase II trial (NCT03944252), patients with aSCAC progressing after one or more lines of treatment were randomized 1:1 to the anti-PD-L1 agent avelumab alone (arm A) or combined with cetuximab (arm B). Overall response rate (ORR) was the primary endpoint. With one-sided α error set at 0.05 and power of 80%, at least 4 responses out of 27 patients per arm had to be observed to declare the study positive. Secondary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.ResultsThirty patients per arm were enrolled. Three patients in arm A and five in arm B achieved partial response: primary endpoint was reached in combination arm. ORR was 10% (95% CI 2.1 to 26.5) and 17% (95% CI 5.6 to 34.7) in arms A and B; disease control rate was 50% (95% CI 31.3 to 68.7) in arm A and 57 (95% CI 37.4–74.5) in arm B. At a median follow-up of 26.7 months (IQR 26.5–26.9), median PFS was 2.0 months (95% CI 1.8 to 4.0) in arm A and 3.9 (95% CI 2.1 to 5.6) in arm B. Median OS was 13.9 months (95% CI 7.7 to 19.4) in arm A and 7.8 (95% CI 6.2 to 11.2) in arm B. Acceptable safety profile was observed in both arms.ConclusionsCARACAS study met its primary endpoint in arm B, documenting promising activity of dual EGFR and PD-L1 blockade in aSCAC.

What to do when nothing else is left to be done - metastatic non-HPV vulvar squamous cell carcinoma with multiple lines of chemotherapy

Recurrent vulvar squamous cell carcinoma with multiple site metastases is a rare entity – (up to 14.2% of the total number of recurrences), with a poor prognosis (only 15% of the patients alive at 5 years). Due to its “hard to find” character, there are no standardized guidelines available and the treatment is extrapolated from advanced cervical carcinoma, anal carcinoma and other squamous cell carcinomas. Immunotherapy has shown some positive results in vulvar carcinoma with PD-L1 positive, high TMB, high MSI or with MMR deficiency. An alternative for selected cases without therapeutic resources could be the HPV vaccine. We present the case of a 64-year-old woman diagnosed in 2014 with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma stage II for which she underwent radical vulvectomy with bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy followed by external radiotherapy. In 2019 she developed local recurrence associated with lung, pleural, lymph nodes and subcutaneous metastasis, treated with three lines of chemotherapy: paclitaxel/carboplatin followed by cisplatin/5-fluorouracil and carboplatin/gemcitabine. The patient’s general health status altered progressively, and she died after the 4th cycle of carboplatin/gemcitabine. This case’s management could be a starting point for the vulvar carcinoma cases where the standard therapeutical options do not represent a choice anymore, providing the necessary example on how to approach it.

386 Is the Routine Histopathology of Haemorrhoidectomy Specimens Cost Effective?

Introduction The necessity for routine histopathologic evaluation of hemorrhoidectomy specimens has been controversial, yet it is commonplace in many hospitals. The cost effectiveness was analysed in a regional hospital in Queensland. Our secondary aim was to also determine the incidence of unexpected abnormality in haemorrhoidectomy specimens. Method This is a retrospective study between March 21st 2012 – April 30th 2020 in a regional hospital in Queensland, and approved by the Health Service Human Research Ethics Committee as a low risk research project. We used Operating Room Management Information System (ORMIS) to obtain a total number of 122 haemorrhoidectomies. The cost of histopathological analysis of a haemorrhoidectomy specimen is AUD$174.65. Results We found that 122 haemorrhoidectomies were performed over the study period. Of these, 66.39% (n = 81) haemorrhoidectomy specimens were sent for routine histopathology. 84.4% (n = 103) were done via the Milligan-Morgan technique. There was intra-operative suspicion of abnormality in 2 cases; histology showed no dysplasia. In total, no specimens had any evidence of dysplasia or neoplasia. Conclusions Routine pathological evaluation of hemorrhoidectomy specimens is not useful and is expensive, as unsuspected anal carcinoma is a rare occurrence and was not demonstrable in the study period. However, a careful pre-operative examination should be performed as unsuspected carcinoma of the anus diagnosed solely by microscopic analysis has been described in the literature. Any suspicious areas should be sent for microscopic evaluation. At a cost of AUD$174.65 per specimen, approximately AUD$1,768.33 could have been saved per annum, or AUD$14,146.65 in 8 years.

Role of Chemotherapy in Vulvar Cancers: Time to Rethink Standard of Care?

The actual role of chemotherapy in vulvar cancer is undeniably a niche topic. The low incidence of the disease limits the feasibility of randomized trials. Decision making is thus oriented by clinical and pathological features, whose relevance is generally weighted against evidence from observational studies and clinical practice. The therapeutic management of vulvar cancer is increasingly codified and refined at an individual patient level. It is of note that the attitude towards evidence sharing and discussion within a multidisciplinary frame is progressively consolidating. Viable options included in the therapeutic armamentarium available for vulvar cancer patients are frequently an adaption from standards used for cervical or anal carcinoma. Chemotherapy is more frequently combined with radiotherapy as neo-/adjuvant or definitive treatment. Drugs commonly used are platinum derivative, 5-fluorouracil and mitomicin C, mostly in combination with radiotherapy for radiosensitization. Exclusive chemotherapy in the neo-/adjuvant setting comprises platinum-derivative, combined with bleomicin and methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, ifosfamide or taxanes. In advanced disease, current regimens include cisplatin-based chemoradiation, with or without 5-fluorouracil, or doublets with platinum in combination with a taxane. Our work is also enriched by a concise excursus on the biologic pathways underlying vulvar cancer. Introductory hints are also provided on targeted agents, a rapidly evolving research field.