scholarly journals Salvage Chemotherapy in Patients with Previously Treated Thymic Carcinoma

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (21) ◽  
pp. 5441
Author(s):  
Kyoichi Kaira ◽  
Hisao Imai ◽  
Ou Yamaguchi ◽  
Atsuto Mouri ◽  
Hiroshi Kagamu
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Thymic Carcinoma ◽  
Salvage Chemotherapy ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Cytotoxic Agents ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Prospective Phase ◽  
Line Setting

Thymic carcinoma is a rare neoplasm, and it is difficult to achieve complete remission with systemic chemotherapy. In advanced or recurrent thymic carcinoma, platinum-based chemotherapy is chosen as the first-line setting; however, it remains unclear which regimen is better to improve its outcome. It remains unknown whether salvage chemotherapy should be administered to patients with platinum-based chemotherapy-refractory thymic carcinoma. Currently, several clinical studies have investigated the efficacy of second-line settings for advanced thymic carcinoma. As cytotoxic agents, S-1, amrubicin, pemetrexed, docetaxel, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine have been reported as prospective phase II studies or retrospective studies. The overall response rates (ORRs) of S-1, amrubicin, and pemetrexed were 25–50%, 11–44.4%, and 9–10%, respectively. Molecular targeting drugs, such as sunitinib, everolimus, and lenvatinib, also provide clinical effectiveness with tolerability after the failure of platinum-based regimens. Based on the results of the prospective phase II study, the ORR, median progression-free survival, and median overall survival were 16.6% and 5.6 months, respectively, in everolimus, 26% and 7.2 months, respectively, in sunitinib, and 38% and 9.3 months, respectively, in lenvatinib. Although it is difficult to compare each study, lenvatinib appears to be better in increasing efficacy as a second-line setting. However, each study had a small sample size, which may have biased the results of their studies. Further investigation is warranted to elucidate the therapeutic significance of salvage chemotherapy in advanced thymic carcinoma in a large-scale study.

scholarly journals Randomized Phase II Study Investigating Pazopanib Versus Weekly Paclitaxel in Relapsed or Progressive Urothelial Cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (16) ◽  
pp. 1770-1777 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Jones ◽  
Syed A. Hussain ◽  
Andrew S. Protheroe ◽  
Alison Birtle ◽  
Prabir Chakraborti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Data Monitoring Committee ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Data Extract ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Line Setting

Purpose Two previous single-arm trials have drawn conflicting conclusions regarding the activity of pazopanib in urothelial cancers after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients and Methods This randomized (1:1) open-label phase II trial compared the efficacy of pazopanib 800 mg orally with paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days) in the second-line setting. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Results Between August 2012 and October 2014, 131 patients, out of 140 planned, were randomly assigned. The study was terminated early on the recommendation of the independent data monitoring committee because of futility. Final analysis after the preplanned number of deaths (n = 110) occurred after a median follow-up of 18 months. One hundred fifteen deaths had occurred at the final data extract presented here. Median OS was 8.0 months for paclitaxel (80% CI, 6.9 to 9.7 months) and 4.7 months for pazopanib (80% CI, 4.2 to 6.4 months). The hazard ratio (HR) adjusted for baseline stratification factors was 1.28 (80% CI, 0.99 to 1.67; one-sided P = .89). Median progression-free survival was 4.1 months for paclitaxel (80% CI, 3.0 to 5.6 months) and 3.1 months for pazopanib (80% CI, 2.7 to 4.6 months; HR, 1.09; 80% CI, 0.85 to 1.40; one-sided P = .67). Discontinuations for toxicity occurred in 7.8% and 23.1% for paclitaxel and pazopanib, respectively. Conclusion Pazopanib did not have greater efficacy than paclitaxel in the second-line treatment of urothelial cancers. There was a trend toward superior OS for paclitaxel.

An Increasing Role for Trabectedin in Gynecological Cancers: Efficacy in Uterine Sarcomas

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supp 1) ◽  
pp. S3-S5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabelle Ray-Coquard
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Uterine Leiomyosarcoma ◽  
Uterine Sarcomas ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Prospective Phase ◽  
Pretreated Patients ◽  
To Receive ◽  
A Current

Trabectedin is indicated for patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma after failure of treatment with anthracyclines and ifosfamide or for patients who are unsuited to receive these agents. The agent has shown activity in patients with advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma, with an acceptable safety profile. Thus, the results of phase II studies have shown that treatment with trabectedin results in 30% progression-free survival at 6 months. More than 50% of these pretreated patients were alive at 1 year. The response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival compared favorably with other single agents (eg, doxorubicin, ifosfamide, and gemcitabine), with clinical benefit in 50% of patients in second-line treatment. These results are being confirmed in a current prospective phase II study in first-line uterine leiomyosarcoma combining trabectedin with doxorubicin.

Pilot study of fixed-dose bevacizumab (200 mg) for solid malignancies

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14600-e14600
Author(s):  
S. K. Reddy ◽  
M. Curti ◽  
M. Janis ◽  
R. Minow
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Optimal Dose ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Phase I Studies ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Prospective Phase ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Grade Iii

e14600 Background: We report our initial experience with fixed dose bevacizumab at 200mg (approximately 3mg/kg). Phase I studies suggested that an optimal dose for phase II studies with bevacizumab is 3mg/kg and that circulating VEGF was undetectable at 0.3mg/kg. (Gordon et al. JCO 2001) We proposed a fixed-dose regimen of bevacizumab which we hypothesized would yield equivalent response rates with reduced toxicities and cost versus higher-dose regimens. Patients with advanced malignancies for whom bevacizumab would be indicated were analyzed. Methods: 15 patients were treated with 200mg bevacizumab in combination with antineoplastic therapy. 6 patients had NSCLCa, 8 patients had Colorectal cancer, and 1 patient had BRCA. Results: 15 patients are evaulable for response and have completed a total of 234 doses of bevacizumab (median number of doses =13) with no grade III/IV toxicity, or bevacizumab associated toxicities seen. No grade III or greater hypertension was observed. Proteinuria was not formally assessed, but no grade 3 or greater proteinuria was reported. All patients are evaluable for response with overall response rate of 33% (5/15). With a median follow-up (from the start of bevacizumab) of 452 days (222–1,699 days), median survival has not been reached with only 2 deaths. Conclusions: Fixed dose bevacizumab appears to be effective, less toxic, significantly less expensive and supported by biologic rationale and prior phase I studies and warrants further investigation. Additional patients will be accrued in a prospective phase II trial. [Table: see text]

Chemosensitivity and clinical features of EML4-ALK-positive patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18145-e18145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jangchul Park ◽  
Chiaki Kondo ◽  
Junichi Shimizu ◽  
Yoshitsugu Horio ◽  
Kimihide Yoshida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stage Iv ◽  
Cytotoxic Agents ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Anaplastic Lymphoma ◽  
Alk Inhibitor ◽  
Alk Positive ◽  
Line Setting

e18145 Background: Lung cancers that harbor EML4-ALK can be effectively treated with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors. Recent reports showed that pemetrexed-based therapy might be an effective treatment in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC. However, the efficacy of other regimens is still not known. The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical characteristics, the efficacy of the cytotoxic chemotherapy in the first and second line setting in EML4-ALK positive NSCLC with advanced stage. Methods: EML4-ALK fusion was screened with RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. When positive results were obtained with either method, gene rearrangement of ALK was confirmed with fluorescent in-situ hybridization. The clinical efficacy of chemotherapy was evaluated retrospectively. Results: We evaluated 20 EML4-ALK positive patients with advanced stage. Twelve patients were without a history of smoking, and 6 light smokers and 2 smokers. Seventeen (85%) of 20 had stage IV disease. Nine cases were male, and 11 were female. The mean age was 46.3 years (range, 26-79 years). Most of the CT findings at the primary site were masses or nodules, while two cases showed air-space consolidation. In the first line chemotherapy, most of the treatment regimens included carboplatin or cisplatin in combination with one or more therapeutic agents, such as taxans, bevacizumab except one case who was treated only by S-1. In 13 cases which were evaluable, 7/13 (53.8%) had a PR, 4/13 (30.8%) had SD, and 2/13 (15.4%) had PD. The treatment regimens in the second line setting included one therapeutic agent such as docetaxel, pemetrexed, S-1 or an oral ALK inhibitor. Among 10 evaluable cases in the second line setting, 2/10 (20%) had a PR, 5/10 (50%) had SD, and 3/10 (30%) had PD. Two patients who had a PR were all treated by oral ALK inhibitor. Within 7 patients who were treated by cytotoxic agents, none had clinical response. Conclusions: Our study suggests that EML4-ALK positive patients may show relatively favorable response to cytotoxic drug in the first line setting, but low response in the second line setting. These data might be helpful for further clinical trials including EML4-ALK positive patients.

Activity and survival benefit of second-line chemotherapy (2L-Ctx) in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (APC): Pooled analysis of the literature.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15019-e15019 ◽  
Author(s):  
MinYuen Teo ◽  
Raymond S. McDermott
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Second Line Chemotherapy ◽  
Line Setting ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

e15019 Background: Many clinicians adopt a nihilistic approach to the management of APC. Delivery of 2L-Ctx is relatively uncommon and no recognized standard exists. We sought to examine the published activity of chemotherapy in the 2nd line setting, and the rate of 2L-Ctx delivery and its influence on reported overall survival in 1st line trials. Methods: 1st and 2L-Ctx randomized trials published between 2000 and 2012 were identified from Pubmed, and manuscripts were obtained for data extraction. Pooled weighted objective response rates (ORR) and disease control rates (DCR) were calculated. For 1st line studies, the percentage of patients who received 2L-Ctx were extracted and plotted against reported median overall survival (OS) and post-progression survival (PPS), defined as arithmetic difference between median OS and progression-free survival. Spearman correlation and linear regression were performed. Results: Sixty nine 2L Ctx studies (77 arms, n=2859) were identified. Majority received prior gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. Pooled ORR was 6.6% (95% CI 5.6 – 7.6%) and DCR was 36.7% (34.5 – 38.0%). When only prospective studies were evaluated (42 studies, 48 arms, n=1546), ORR was 5.0% (3.8 – 6.2%) and DCR was 33.9% (31.0 – 36.9%). Exploratory analysis suggested that intensification of gemcitabine-based therapy (ORR: 10.0%; DCR: 54.7%) might be marginally more active than fluoropyrimidine (7.6%; 32.2%) or taxane based 2L-Ctx (5.2%; 33.6%). 28/52 identified 1st line studies (54%) reported the percentage of patients treated with second-line chemotherapy (11 phase II, 28 arms, n=1450; 17 phase III, 33 arms, n=5051). Percentage of 2L-Ctx delivery ranged from 14 – 68% and correlated with OS (r=.49 [.26 – .67], p<.01) and PPS (r=.57 [.36 – .72], p<.01). When phase II studies were excluded, correlation was improved for OS (r=.63 [.35 – .81], p<.01) and PPS (r=.79 [.59 – .89], p<.01). Percentage of locally advanced disease did not correlate with OS/PPS nor affect prior analysis. Conclusions: Whilst awaiting further advancement in the 1st line setting, increased delivery of 2L-Ctx to patients with APC and maintained performance status may offer a survival benefit.

A phase II trial of weekly docetaxel for second-line treatment of urothelial carcinoma.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15613-e15613
Author(s):  
Young Saing Kim ◽  
Moon Ki Choi ◽  
Jung Yong Hong ◽  
Chi Hoon Maeng ◽  
Soonil Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Chemotherapy ◽  
Weekly Docetaxel ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

e15613 Background: Despite high response rates (RRs) with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced urothelial carcinoma (UCC), treatment after first-line failure remains unclear. The present multi-center phase II trial evaluated the tolerability and efficacy of weekly docetaxel as second-line chemotherapy for UCC. Methods: Between Aug 2010 and Sep 2012, 31 patients with measurable UCC, progressive after one prior platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced disease, were treated with docetaxel 30 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8. Treatment was repeated every 21 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoints were the RR, progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. To detect a 20% difference in RR (6% vs. 26%), 28 eligible patients were required. Results: All 31 patients were previously treated with gemcitabine/platinum and had Bellmunt risk of one or more. The patients’ median age was 64 years (range, 40 to 79) and 31 (100%) patients had an ECOG performance status of 1. A total of 106 (median, 2; range, 1 to 16) chemotherapy cycles were delivered. Although fatigue (13%) and anorexia (6%) were the most frequently observed grade 3 or 4 toxicities, safety profiles were generally mild and manageable. One patient developed prolonged thrombocytopenia which led to treatment discontinuation but was resolved thereafter. In an intent-to-treat analysis, two (6%) patients achieved objective response, which maintained for 3.0 to 7.8 months. Eight patients experienced disease stabilization, resulting in a disease control rate of 32%. The median PFS and overall survival were 1.4 (95% CI, 1.3 to 1.6) and 9.6 (95% CI, 7.8 to 11.4) months, respectively. Conclusions: Second-line chemotherapy with weekly docetaxel was well tolerated but demonstrated modest antitumor activity in patient with advanced UCC who had progression after first-line platinum-containing regimen and poor prognostic factors. Clinical trial information: NCT01711112.

Phase II study of weekly scheduled irinotecan and capecitabine treatment in advanced colorectal cancer patients.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14644-e14644
Author(s):  
Wenhua Li ◽  
Jin Li ◽  
Jianming Xu ◽  
Lin Shen ◽  
Tianshu Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Current Phase ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Severe Diarrhea ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Setting

e14644 Background: The clinical application of combination therapy of irinotecan and capecitabine is at a standstill due to the consideration on severe diarrhea. The aim of the current phase II study was to explore the optimal administration mode of these two drugs, and evaluate the safety and efficacy of weekly-scheduled XELIRI regimen (wXELIRI) in mCRC pts. Methods: Pts with unresectable, histologically confirmed mCRC were enrolled to receive wXELIRI: irinotecan 90mg/m(2) on Day 1 and capecitabine 1200 mg/m(2) bid on Days 1-5 weekly. Both the first-line pts and second-line treatment pts who failed with FOLFOX or XELOX were eligible. The primary endpoint was rate of Grade 3/4 diarrhea. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and other safeties. Results: From January 2011 to May 2012, totally 43 pts with measurable mCRC were enrolled, 18 of them were male and 25 were female. The median age was 60 yrs (range 32-70). No Grade 4 diarrhea was observed and the rate of grade 3 diarrhea was 4.7%. The most common Grade 3/4 toxicities included leucocyte(11.6%), neutrophile (18.6%), vomiting (4.7%), fatigue (2.3%), hand-foot-syndrome (2.3%) . With a median follow-up of 19.0 months, 23 PFS events were observed. The mPFS for all the 43 pts was 6.1 mons and the mOS was 15.5 mons. For the 31 first-line treatment pts, the mPFS was 7.5 mons and the mOS has not reached. In the second-line treatment group (12 pts), the mPFS was 5.4 mons and mOS was 13.8 mons. Conclusions: The weekly-scheduled irinotecan and capecitabine combination has a low rate of severe diarrhea and acceptable toxicity profile. It could be an alternative regimen for mCRC pts, especially in the second-line setting. Clinical trial information: NCT01322152.

Multicenter phase II clinical trial of everolimus in Japanese patients with unresectable or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) after failure of treatment with first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 455-455
Author(s):  
Seiichiro Ozono ◽  
Masafumi Oyama ◽  
Masahiro Nozawa ◽  
Kiyohide Fujimoto ◽  
Ken Kishida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Eortc Qlq ◽  
Line Setting

455 Background: Everolimus has shown the efficacy and the safety in the phase III trial (RECORD-1) in patients with mRCC after failure of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-TKI. However, 26% of patients received two TKIs (sunitinib and sorafenib) as previous therapy in RECORD-1. In addition, as pre-treatment before TKI, 65% of patients received cytokine therapy and 13% of patients received chemotherapy. Therefore, there is still no clear evidence of everolimus as second line setting after failure of 1st-line TKI therapy. Methods: This study is an open-label, multi-center, single-arm, phase II trial. Primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints are overall survival, objective response rate, time-to-treatment-failure, safety and quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30, FKSI-DRS, EQ-5D). Key eligibility criteria are RCC with clear cell component, patients who received one TKI as first line therapy, patients who did not receive cytokine and chemotherapy and ECOG performance status 0-1. Results: 57 patients were enrolled from 02/11 to 12/12. Median age was 63 years, common sites of metastasis were lung (32.7%) and bone (12.2%), 79.6% had previous nephrectomy, previous TKI therapy were sunitinib (69.4%), sorafenib (22.4%) and axitinib (8.2%). Median PFS was 4.4 months (95% confidence interval: 3.7-6.0). 8.2% had partial response and 57.1% had stable disease according to RECIST v.1.0. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) of all grades was 95.9%. Major AEs were stomatitis (49.0%), hypertriglyceridemia (26.5%) and hypercholesterolemia (24.5%). Serious AEs were stomatitis (10.2%), interstitial lung disease (6.1%) and rash (6.1%). There were no treatment related deaths. All QOL scores were not changed at 2 months, while dyspnea and global health scores of EORTC QLQ-C30 and FKSI-DRS score were worsened at 4 months. Conclusions: This study is a first report of everolimus as second line setting after failure of 1st-line TKI. Further study and long-term follow-up would be warranted. Clinical trial information: UMIN000004742.

A single-arm, multicenter, open-label phase II trial of cabazitaxel as second-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma (TCC).

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 372-372
Author(s):  
Avivit Peer ◽  
Avivit Neumann ◽  
Daniel Keizman ◽  
Stephen Jay Frank ◽  
Raanan Berger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Transitional Cell ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Toxicity Profile ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Microtubule Inhibitor ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

372 Background: For patients with advanced TCC who have progressed on a platinum-based regimen, no widely accepted standard second line therapy currently exists. A 2-stage phase II study was conducted to assess the activity and toxicity profile of the microtubule inhibitor cabazitaxel (Jevtana; FDA-approved in hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer previously treated with a docetaxel-containing regimen) in patients with metastatic TCC after failure of prior platinum-based chemotherapy. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01600339. Methods: Patients with one prior platinum based systemic therapy for metastatic TCC received cabazitaxel at a dose of 25 mg\m2every 21 days with prophylactic GCSF support, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective tumor response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included safety, time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS). Results: Twenty-three patients were enrolled to the study, 19 of whom received treatment. Male\female ratio was 15\4 and the median age was 67 (range, 56-81) years. Partial response (PR) was observed in 1 patient (5.3%), 10 patients (52.6%) achieved stable disease (SD), including 8 (42.1%) that had prolonged SD (≥16 weeks).Furthermore, the disease control rate (PR or prolonged SD) was 47.4%. The median TTP and OS were 4.2 (95% CI, 2.0-6.0) months and 9.9 (95% CI 5.6-13.2) months, respectively. The median number of treatment cycles was 5 (range 1-10). One patient experienced Grade 5 toxicity. Neutropenic fever occurred in 10.6% of patients. Most common toxicities were anemia and diarrhea. Conclusions: Cabazitaxel had modest efficacy in the treatment of advanced TCC, and there was no evidence of a significant response. Toxicity profile was considerable. The role of Cabazitaxel in urothelial carcinoma may need further evaluation in rational combination strategies, but not as a single agent. Clinical trial information: NCT01600339.

Nintedanib versus placebo in patients receiving mFOLFOX6 for metastatic, chemorefractory colorectal cancer: TRICC-C trial—Final results from the randomized phase II trial of the AIO.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 666-666
Author(s):  
Thomas Jens Ettrich ◽  
Andreas Wolfgang Berger ◽  
Thomas Decker ◽  
Ralf Hofheinz ◽  
Volker Heinemann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Line Setting

666 Background: Anti-VEGF agents plus chemotherapy improve PFS of patients with mCRC in the first- and second-line-setting. During this treatment tumour angiogenesis is driven by other factors but VEGF. Nintedanib, a triple angiokinase inhibitor of VEGFR-1-3, FGFR-1/-3 and PDGFR-α/-β, thereby additionally targets angiogenic escape mechanisms upon resistance to anti-VEGF treatment. The TRICC-C trial evaluates the combination of mFOLFOX6 plus Nintedanib. Final results of the randomized phase II trial are presented. Methods: Patients with mCRC having received one line of non-oxaliplatin containing palliative chemotherapy, with an ECOG-PS of 0/1 were randomized 1:1 in a double-blind design to receive: mFOLFOX6 plus Nintedanib (2 x 200 mg p.o./d, d1-d14) or placebo, respectively, repeated every 14 days. Primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints were ORR, OS and safety. Patients who received at least one dose of trial medication were included in the efficacy and safety analyses. Results: From 12/2012 to 5/2016 53 patients (scheduled n = 180) were randomized. The trial was terminated prematurely due to slow accrual. Compared to mFOLFOX6 plus placebo (F+P), the combination of mFOLFOX6 plus Nintedanib (F+N) improved mPFS (F+P: 4.6 vs. F+N: 8.1 mo.; HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.32-1.30; p = 0.2156), mOS (F+P: 9.9 vs. F+N: 17.1 mo.; HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.48-2.23; p = 0.9387) and DCR (F+P: 50 vs. F+N: 66,7%; p = 0.2709). ORR was comparable in both arms (F+N: 3.8 vs. F+P: 3.7%). Toxicity was low to moderate without major differences between both arms except G 3/4 neutropenia (F+N: 19%, F+P: 12%) and GI disorders (F+N: 23%, F+P: 15%). Conclusions: Final results suggest a PFS, OS and DCR benefit for mFOLFOX6 + Nintedanib in the second-line therapy of mCRC. Due to the premature termination of the trial there was no statistical significance demonstrable. Showing no clinically significant PFS-benefit in the first-line situation (mFOLFOX6 plus Nintedanib/Bevacizumab, Ann Oncol. 2015) or the last line as single agent, respectively (ESMO 2016) the TRICC-C results suggests that Nintedanib plus mFOLFOX6 could be an interesting therapeutic option for the second-line situation. Clinical trial information: NCT01362361.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document