Pilot study of fixed-dose bevacizumab (200 mg) for solid malignancies

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14600-e14600
Author(s):  
S. K. Reddy ◽  
M. Curti ◽  
M. Janis ◽  
R. Minow

e14600 Background: We report our initial experience with fixed dose bevacizumab at 200mg (approximately 3mg/kg). Phase I studies suggested that an optimal dose for phase II studies with bevacizumab is 3mg/kg and that circulating VEGF was undetectable at 0.3mg/kg. (Gordon et al. JCO 2001) We proposed a fixed-dose regimen of bevacizumab which we hypothesized would yield equivalent response rates with reduced toxicities and cost versus higher-dose regimens. Patients with advanced malignancies for whom bevacizumab would be indicated were analyzed. Methods: 15 patients were treated with 200mg bevacizumab in combination with antineoplastic therapy. 6 patients had NSCLCa, 8 patients had Colorectal cancer, and 1 patient had BRCA. Results: 15 patients are evaulable for response and have completed a total of 234 doses of bevacizumab (median number of doses =13) with no grade III/IV toxicity, or bevacizumab associated toxicities seen. No grade III or greater hypertension was observed. Proteinuria was not formally assessed, but no grade 3 or greater proteinuria was reported. All patients are evaluable for response with overall response rate of 33% (5/15). With a median follow-up (from the start of bevacizumab) of 452 days (222–1,699 days), median survival has not been reached with only 2 deaths. Conclusions: Fixed dose bevacizumab appears to be effective, less toxic, significantly less expensive and supported by biologic rationale and prior phase I studies and warrants further investigation. Additional patients will be accrued in a prospective phase II trial. [Table: see text]

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 1751-1751 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernesto Wasserman ◽  
Caroline Cuvier ◽  
François Lokiec ◽  
François Goldwasser ◽  
Salima Kalla ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: Two phase I studies of the oxaliplatin and irinotecan combination were performed in advanced gastrointestinal cancer patients to characterize the safety and pharmacokinetics of the regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a performance status (PS) of ≤2 and normal hematologic, hepatic, and renal functions received oxaliplatin (2-hour intravenous infusion) followed 1 hour later by irinotecan administered over a 30-minute period, every 3 weeks. Dose levels that were explored ranged from 85 to 110 mg/m2 for oxaliplatin and 150 to 250 mg/m2 for irinotecan. Plasma pharmacokinetics of total and ultrafiltrable platinum, irinotecan, SN-38, and its glucuronide, SN-38G, were determined. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients with gastrointestinal carcinomas (24 with colorectal cancer [CRC], four with pancreas cancer, four with gastric cancer, three with hepatocarcinoma, and four with other) received 216 treatment cycles. Median age was 54 years (range, 21 to 72 years); 95% had PS of 0 to 1; all but six had failed fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy. The maximum-tolerated dose was oxaliplatin 110 mg/m2 plus irinotecan 200 mg/m2 in one study and oxaliplatin 110 mg/m2 plus irinotecan 250 mg/m2 in the other study. Grade 3 to 4 diarrhea and febrile neutropenia were dose-limiting toxicities; other toxicities included emesis and dose-cumulative neuropathy. Recommended dose for phase II studies is oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 and irinotecan 200 mg/m2. At this dose (12 patients, 65 cycles), grade 3 and 4 toxicities per patient included the following: emesis in 42% of patients, neutropenia in 33% (febrile episodes in 17%), peripheral neuropathy in 25%, delayed diarrhea in 17%, and thrombocytopenia in 8%. Two patients with Gilbert's syndrome experienced severe irinotecan toxicity. No plasmatic pharmacokinetic interactions were detected. Seven partial responses were observed in 24 CRC patients. CONCLUSION: This combination is feasible, with activity in 5-FU–resistant CRC patients. Phase I studies that explore the every-2-weeks schedule, in addition to phase II studies of this schedule (as well as in combination with 5-FU) as second-line therapy of metastatic CRC, are ongoing.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4156-4156
Author(s):  
Mary Beth Rios ◽  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Tapan Kadia ◽  
Zeev Estrov ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4156 Background Alkylating agents are active in leukemia. Examples are cyclophosphamide, chlorambucil, melphalan, busulfan, and others. Bendamustine, a rationally designed drug that incorporates alkylating agent properties plus an adenosine-like ring structure, may be active in leukemia. Fractionated doses of alkylators may improve efficacy (e.g. fractioned cyclophosphamide in ALL). Methods We initiated a phase I-II study of bendamustine in patients with refractory leukemia, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, or myelodysplastic syndromes. Starting dose was 50mg/m2 IV BID over 1-2 hours for 4 days every 4 weeks (3 pts.) with escalation to 75mg (3 pts.), and 100mg (6 pts). Three additional patients were treated at 50mg/m2 once that dose was declared safe as allowed by study design. Diagnoses were AML 12, ALL 2, MDS 1. Median age was 48 (range 22 to 88). All patients were refractory or had relapsed after multiple courses of chemotherapy. The median number of prior therapies was 3 (range 1 to 9). Five patients had chromosome 5, 7, or 8 abnormalities, 6 patients had miscellaneous abnormalities, 4 patients were diploid. Results Toxicity – Grade 1-2 expected toxicities of nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and transient transaminase elevations were seen at all dose levels. At the 75 mg/m2 dose level grade 3 transaminase elevation was seen in 1 pt. which occurred with rash and diarrhea, was thought to be related to GVHD and all subsided with dose increase of tacrolimus. One patient who began therapy with a creatinine of 1.8 had creatinine increase to 3.3 mg/DL. At the 100mg/m2 dose level 2/3 patients developed creatinine increase to 3.2 and 2.6 mg/DL. The creatinine increase occurred on day 7 and subsided by day 11 in both pts. An additional 3 pts. were treated at this dose level with no increase in creatinine to >2 mg/DL. Results Response – Antileukemic activity was encouraging: 8/15 patients with peripheral blasts had >90% reduction of the leukemic cells; 2 patients had >50% reduction of marrow blasts % (90 to 10, 86 to 40). Bendamustine has shown activity in this heavily pretreated refractory leukemia group. While the creatinine elevations were not severe (grade 3-4 NCI CTC) they were consistent to consider a bendamustine dose schedule of 50-75 mg/m2 IV BID x 4 days as a reasonable phase II schedule to explore in better prognosis patients, particularly in adult ALL in phase II studies. Disclosures: Ravandi: Cephalon: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kantarjian:Cephalon: Research Funding.


1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 210-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Abigerges ◽  
G G Chabot ◽  
J P Armand ◽  
P Hérait ◽  
A Gouyette ◽  
...  

PURPOSE A phase I study was undertaken to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), principal toxicities, and pharmacokinetics of the novel topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan (CPT-11). PATIENTS AND METHODS Sixty-four patients meeting standard phase I eligibility criteria were included (24 women, 40 men; median age, 51 years; primary sites: colon, head and neck, lung, pleura; 60 of 64 had been previously treated). Pharmacokinetics was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). RESULTS One hundred ninety CPT-11 courses were administered as a 30-minute intravenous (IV) infusion every 3 weeks (100 to 750 mg/m2). Grade 3 to 4 nonhematologic toxicities included diarrhea (16%; three hospitalizations), nausea and vomiting (9%), asthenia (14%), alopecia (53%), elevation of hepatic transaminases (8%), and one case of skin toxicity. An acute cholinergic syndrome was observed during CPT-11 administration. Diarrhea appeared dose-limiting at 350 mg/m2, but this was circumvented by using a high-dose loperamide protocol that allowed dose escalation. Dose-dependent, reversible, noncumulative granulocytopenia was the dose-limiting toxicity (nadir, days 6 to 9; median recovery time, 5 days). Grade 3 to 4 anemia was observed in 9% of patients. One patient died during the study, 8 days after CPT-11 treatment. Two complete responses (cervix, 450 mg/m2; head and neck, 750 mg/m2) and six partial responses in fluorouracil (5-FU)-refractory colon cancer were observed (260 to 600 mg/m2). Pharmacokinetics of CPT-11 and active metabolite SN-38 were performed in 60 patients (94 courses). CPT-11 plasma disposition was bi- or triphasic, with a mean terminal half-life of 14.2 +/- 0.9 hours (mean +/- SEM). The mean volume of distribution (Vdss) was 157 +/- 8 L/m2, and total-body clearance was 15 +/- 1 L/m2/h. The CPT-11 area under the plasma concentration versus time curves (AUC) and SN-38 AUC increased linearly with dose. SN-38 plasma decay had an apparent half-life of 13.8 +/- 1.4 hours. Both CPT-11 and SN-38 AUCs correlated with nadir leukopenia and granulocytopenia, with grade 2 diarrhea, and with nausea and vomiting. CONCLUSION The MTD of CPT-11 administered as a 30-minute IV infusion every 3 weeks is 600 mg/m2, with granulocytopenia being dose-limiting. At 350 mg/m2, diarrhea appeared dose-limiting, but high-dose loperamide reduced this toxicity and allowed dose escalation. For safety reasons, the recommended dose is presently 350 mg/m2 every 3 weeks; more experience must be gained to establish the feasibility of a higher dose in large multicentric phase II studies. However, when careful monitoring of gastrointestinal toxicities is possible, a higher dose of 500 mg/m2 could be recommended in good-risk patients. The activity of this agent in 5-FU-refractory colorectal carcinoma makes it unique and mandates expedited phase II testing.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 1455-1455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Faderl ◽  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Varsha Gandhi ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Gautam Borthakur ◽  
...  

Abstract Clofarabine (CLO) is an adenosine nucleoside analog with activity in adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Its activity in MDS is less well defined. To evaluate the activity and safety of CLO in MDS we designed two phase II studies with iv CLO and po CLO, respectively. Pts were eligible if they had MDS with ≥ 5% blasts, fell into IPSS intermediate-2 and high-risk groups, or had CMML. No prior intensive chemotherapy or high-dose cytarabine was allowed. Hematopoietic growth factor support was permitted. In the iv study pts were adaptively randomized to receive CLO 15 or 30 mg/m2 iv daily x 5 every 4–6 weeks. The second study used a starting dose of CLO 40 mg/m2 orally daily x 5 every 4–6 weeks (assuming oral bioavailability about 50%), which was then decreased to 30 mg/m2 orally daily x 5. Thirty pts (18 RAEB, 6 RAEB-T, 6 CMML) have been treated. Assignment by IPSS for RAEB and RAEB-T pts: 10 high-risk, 10 intermediate-2, and 4 intermediate-1. Fifteen pts received iv CLO and 15 po CLO. Median age was 68 yrs (range 57–86). Median number of prior therapies was 1 (0–4). Twenty (67%) pts received prior decitabine or azacitidine. Karyotype was abnormal in 24 (80%) pts, including 10 pts with −5/−7 abnormalities. Responses were determined according to International Working Group criteria (IWG). Twenty-seven pts were evaluable for response (2 pts too early, one refused further treatment on day 4 of first course). Eleven (41%) pts responded [7 (26%) CR, 2 (7%) HI, 2 (7%) clinical benefit (CB)] (see table). Response (%) Route Dose (mg/m2) N CR HI CB po 40 6 - - 1 (17) 30 6 1(17) 2 (33) 1 (17) iv 30 6 2 (33) - - 15 9 4 (44) - - Response by IPSS: 67% intermediate-1, 44% intermediate-2, 40% high. Twenty-seven pts are evaluable for toxicities. Grade ≥ 3 toxicities occurred in 8 of 13 pts on iv CLO (rash, hyperbilirubinemia, elevated transaminases, elevations of creatinine, acute renal failure) and 4 of 14 pts with po CLO (rash, hyperbilirubinemia, elevated transaminases). Myelosuppression resulting in febrile episodes and hospitalizations with both iv and po CLO was ubiquitous, but prolonged myelosuppression (> 42 days) was rare. In summary, CLO has activity in pts with higher-risk MDS. The optimal dose and schedule for po and iv CLO have not been defined yet. Lower doses of CLO are associated with responses. Correlative PK studies may help to provide further support for optimal dose and route of administration of CLO in pts with MDS.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 921-921
Author(s):  
Chadi Nabhan ◽  
Jacob David Bitran ◽  
Walter Fried ◽  
Angel G. Galvez ◽  
Laura Magid ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 921 Background: CLO is a second generation nucleoside analogue with known activity in acute leukemia and myelodysplasia. As there is no standard therapy for refractory and transplant-ineligible relapsed NHL, and given the activity that purine analogues have in lymphoid malignancies, we sought to investigate the activity of CLO in this pt population regardless of histology. Methods: Eligible pts had measurable disease by CT and/or PET, ECOG performance status ≤ 2, and adequate renal, cardiac, liver, and bone marrow function (unless cytopenias were disease-related). CLO was given in the outpatient setting intravenously over 1-hour days 1-5 every 28 days for 6 cycles maximum. All pts received anti-viral and anti-pneumocystis jiroveci prophylaxis. First, we initiated a phase I portion using a standard 3×3 study design. CLO was given at 4 mg/m2 in cohort 1 with subsequent cohorts to be escalated by 2 mg/m2 each. Once the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined, the phase II portion of this study was initiated at the MTD. All pts were followed until disease progression. Results: Thirty-three pts (18 females, 15 males) have been enrolled (7 in the phase I portion and 26 in the phase II), of which 29 are evaluable for response and/or toxicity (2 just started therapy, 1 taken off due to persistent cytopenias, and 1 withdrew consent). Median age was 69 years (range 27-88), median number of prior therapies was 3 (range 1-8), with 21% failing prior stem cell transplantation and 74% being R-refractory. Median time from original diagnosis to first CLO treatment was 36 months (range 6-216). Histologies included 12 diffuse large cell, 5 follicular, 5 small lymphocytic, 4 anaplastic large T-cell, and 1 each for Richter, mantle cell, marginal zone, peripheral T-cell, transformed, non-specific T-cell, and mixed histology. Median number of CLO cycles was 4 (range 1-6). Thrombocytopenia was the dose-limiting toxicity at 6 mg/m2 in 2/6 pts. The MTD recommended for phase II was 4 mg/m2. With a median follow up of 8 months (range 1-33), 7 pts (24%) showed complete response (CR) and 8 (27%) had partial response (PR) for an overall response rate of 51%. Four pts (13%) demonstrated stable disease and 10 (34%) showed progression. Median duration of response was 7 months (range 2-33+) with 6 pts continuing in remission including a patient who is undergoing stem cell transplantation. Median time to progression (TTP) was 3.5 months with median overall survival of 8 months. sEVEN pts (24%) remain progression-free. Of patients who were followed for more than 12 months, 60% were alive at 1-year. Five of the CR pts were of low-grade histology while only 2 had large cell lymphoma. All pts required growth factor support. Toxicity was mainly hematologic with 63% experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, 60% grade 3/4 neutropenia, and 39% grade3/4 anemia, and 63%. Grade 3 and/or 4 non-hematologic toxicity included 2 (6%) with tumor lysis syndrome, 2 (6%) infectious episodes (pneumonia and bilateral cellulitis), 2 (6%) renal insufficiency, 2 (6%) fatigue, 1 (3%) seizure activity, 1 (3%) pleural effusion, and 1 hypokalemia (3%). No treatment-related mortality. Conclusions: CLO is active in heavily pre-treated B-cell NHL including R-refractory pts. Activity appears more pronounced in low-grade histology. The drug is well-tolerated and can be administered as an outpatient. Reversible myelosuppression is the major toxicity. Future studies in front-line in combination with R are warranted. Disclosures: Nabhan: Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genzyme: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Venugopal:Genzyme: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 388-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gautam Borthakur ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) mutation in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with early relapse and poor survival. Quizartinib potently and selectively inhibits FLT3 kinase activity. In a phase I and II studies the composite response rate (CRR) was approximately 50% among patients with FLT3-ITD. There is in-vitro synergy between quizartinib and 5-AZA or LDAC. We hypothesize that adding quizartinib to a hypomethylating agent such as 5-azacitidine (AZA) or cytarabine may improve the response rate expected from the use of either agent alone. Objectives: The primary objective of phase I part is to determine the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination of quizartinib (AC220) with either AZA or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC); for phase II is to determine the clinical activity of both combinations. This planned interim analysis reports on the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and first futility analysis. Methods: For phase I, patients with relapsed/refractory high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) or AML were eligible irrespective of FLT3 mutation and salvage status. For phase II, presence of FLT3-ITD is a requisite. Phase II enrollment is limited to patients >60 years with untreated MDS/CMML/AML, or any age receiving first salvage treatment. Additional eligibilities include performance status ECOG ≤2, adequate organ function, normal electrolytes (potassium, calcium and magnesium). Important exclusions include QTcF> 450 mSec, concomitant drugs that prolong QT/QTc interval or strong CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers with the exception of antibiotics, antifungals, and antivirals that are used as standard of care. Treatment cycle is defined as 28 days. Treatment comprises of AZA 75 mg/m2 subcutaneously (SQ) or intravenously (IV) for 7 days of every cycle (Days 1-7), or cytarabine 20 mg SQ twice daily for 10 days of every cycle (Days 1-10) along with quizartinib at two planned dose levels: 60 mg (dose level 1) or 90 mg orally daily (dose level 2) uninterrupted. Patients are assigned to AZA or LDAC arm by physician choice or slot availability. Planned accrual for each arm in phase 2 is 26 pts each and an ORR of ≥50% will be considered favorable. Accrual of 26 pts will give a 95% credible interval for overall response rate of (0.32, 0.68). The study will be stopped for toxicity (>30%) and/or futility (ORR <50%) at interim analysis for each arm. Results: Twenty-six (Phase I=12, phase II=14) pts have been enrolled: 18 to AZA arm and 8 to LDAC arm. Median age is 62 years (range, 25-79 years), 7 (27%) are female. Cytogenetics are diploid=14, +8=2, -7=2, miscellaneous=6, 11q and t(8;21)= 1 each. Median number of prior therapies is 2 (range, 0-7), 7 patients received prior FLT3 inhibitor. For both schedules quizartinib 60 mg daily was identified as the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) based on emerging results from separate dose-finding study. Eighteen [5 in LDAC arm (63%) and 13 (72%) in AZA arm; all with FLT3-ITD mutation without D835 mutation] of 26 total pts (69%) have responded (CR=1/ CRp=3/ CRi=2/ MLFS=10/PR=1/HI=1). Among patients with FLT3-ITD (N=22), ORR is 82%. Four of 7 (57%) patients with prior FLT3 inhibitor exposure responded. Median number of days to respond is 57 days (range, 25-102 days). Among responders two patients died (MLFS=1, PR=1): one with gastro-intestinal bleeding and other with progressive pneumonia. Three additional responders have discontinued therapy for stem cell transplant (1), withdrawal of consent (1), and loss of response with emergence of D835 mutation (1). Nine responders (CR=1, CRi=1, CRp=1, PR=1, MLS=5) had >50% reduction of FLT3-ITD allelic burden and 2 additional pts (CR=1, CRi=1) had no detectable FLT3-ITD at response. Number of pts with treatment emergent grade 3/4 toxicities irrespective of attribution include hypokalemia (15), hypophosphatemia (5), hyponatremia (4), hypocalcemia (4), hyperbilirubinemia (3), increase in ALT (1), hypernatremia (1hyperglycemia (1), hypotension (1), QTcF prolongation (1, grade 3). Conclusion: Combination of quizartinib and AZA or LDAC is highly active among patients with AML/MDS/CMML with FLT3-ITD . Response rates appear higher than expected with either agent alone. Clinically significant QTcF prolongation is infrequent. Accrual to both arms of the current trial continues. Disclosures Cortes: Ambit Biosciences: Research Funding.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8501-8501 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Lossos ◽  
M. D. Craig ◽  
M. S. Tallman ◽  
R. V. Boccia ◽  
P. R. Conkling ◽  
...  

8501 Background: Darinaparsin (ZIO-101) is a novel organic arsenical active against diverse cancers in vitro, and in vivo. Darinaparsin i.v. activity in lymphoma is being evaluated in a phase II study. Darinaparsin is orally bioavailable; the oral form is being investigated in two phase I studies in patients with advanced malignancies. Methods: Phase II trial is being conducted in patients diagnosed with advanced lymphomas who had ≥ 1 prior therapy. Patients receive 300 mg/m2/day of darinaparsin i.v. for 5 consecutive days every 28 days. Efficacy and safety are evaluated by standard criteria. Phase I oral dose escalation studies are being conducted in patients with advanced malignancies and explore safety, MTD, DLTs and preliminary efficacy of continuous and intermittent dosing schedules. Starting continuous dose is 100 mg BID for 3 weeks with 1 week rest, starting intermittent dose is 300 mg twice weekly for 3 weeks followed by 1 week rest. Results: The phase II study has accrued 28 lymphoma patients (21 non-Hodgkin's, 7 Hodgkin's); median age at baseline 61 years, ECOG ≤2, median number of prior therapies 3. Seventeen subjects have received at least 2 cycles of darinaparsin and are evaluable for efficacy. Of these, 1 subject (PTCL) has achieved a complete response, 3 - partial responses (2 marginal zone, 1 Hodgkin's), and 4 stable disease (2 PTCL, 1 DLBCL, 1 Hodgkin's). A total of 63 cycles of darinaparsin have been administered to subjects with lymphoma. No Gr. 3 or higher drug-related AEs were reported. Two SAEs were considered possibly drug-related (fall; neutropenic fever). Phase I studies accrued 35 patients; median age at baseline 58 years, ECOG ≤2, median number of prior therapies 3. Predominant tumor types include: colorectal (17), pancreatic (3), NHL (3). Current darinaparsin dose levels: continuous 200 mg BID, 2× weekly 900 mg. Of 18 patients evaluable for efficacy, 10 demonstrate SD ≥ 3 cycles. Oral darinaparsin bioavailability is 58%. Drug-related AEs include nausea/vomiting, fatigue, decreased appetite/anorexia. Conclusions: Darinaparsin is active in heavily pretreated patients with advanced lymphoma and has been very well tolerated. Oral darinaparsin is also well tolerated, and shows early activity. [Table: see text]


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 162-162
Author(s):  
Sung Rok Kim ◽  
Sung-En Park ◽  
Young Jin Yuh ◽  
Byeong Seok Sohn ◽  
Hye Ran Lee ◽  
...  

162 Background: The results of recent studies with duo- or triple regimen for the advanced gastric cancer are still not satisfactory and the optimal doses of combinations with taxanes, fluorouracil and platinum analogues were not determined yet. The aim of this study is to determine the optimal dose of docetaxel and oxaliplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil(FU) [DOF], with the efficacy and toxicity in patients (pts) with advanced gastric cancer. Methods: The pts with unresectable, metastatic, or relapsed gastric cancer were enrolled for a phase I/II study. The dose of docetaxel and oxliplatin was escalated from 50 mg/m2 and 80 mg/m2 day 1, respectively by traditional 3+3 design, and 5-FU was fixed at 850 mg/m2/day 24 hour continuous infusion day 1-4, all every 3 weeks. All pts had measurable disease and were assessable for toxicity. Results: A total of 50 pts including 12 patients from phase I study were enrolled. The recommended phase II dose of docetaxel and oxaliplatin were 60mg/m2 and 100mg/m2 on day 1 (cohort 2), respectively. A total of 335 cycles of chemotherapy was administrated (median: 6, range 1–24) and the dose intensity of docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and 5-FU were 96.3%, 96.2% and 98.5%, respectively. Twenty two (44.0%) of 50 patients showed partial response, 22 (44.0%) stable disease, and 1 (2.0%) complete response. The overall response rate was 46.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 32.2–60.0%) and the disease control rate 90.0% (95% CI: 81.7–98.3%). The median progression free survival was 6.5 months (95% CI, 3.3–9.8) and the overall survival 10.7 month (95% CI, 7.0–14.3). Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 81 (24.1%) and 3 cycles (0.9%), respectively [27 (56%) and 3 (6%) in 50 pts, respectively]. Grade 3/4 stomatitis, diarrhea and neuropathy occurred in 2 (0.6%), 6 (1.8%) and 6 cycles (5.7%), respectively. Conclusions: The recommended phase II dose of docetaxel and oxaliplatin was 60mg/m2 and 100mg/m2, respectively. This DOF combination chemotherapy has no better efficacy than reference regimen. The toxicities were substantial in some pts, but generally manageable.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4537-4537 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. A. Ronnen ◽  
G. V. Kondagunta ◽  
C. Lau ◽  
P. Fischer ◽  
M. S. Ginsberg ◽  
...  

4537 Background: Sunitinib malate (SU11248) is an oral multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGF and PDGF receptors. Two phase II trials with sunitinib given as second line therapy in patients with mRCC showed a ≥40% response rate (JCO 2006;24:16–24; Proc ASCO 23,380s). Combining sunitinib and gefitinib (an EGFR inhibitor) may enhance antitumor activity by providing a broader spectrum of tyrosine kinase inhibition. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of sunitinib in combination with gefitinib was assessed in this Phase I trial. Methods: Patients with mRCC previously treated with cytokine therapy were enrolled in the study. Cohorts of 4–6 patients received escalating doses of sunitinib and a fixed dose of gefitinib. Dose levels of sunitinib were 37.5 mg and 50 mg. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as Grade 4 hematologic toxicity, Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity of ≥7 days or a Grade 2 cardiac toxicity. Six-week treatment cycles comprised of sunitinib daily for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks off and continuous gefitinib at 250 mg daily except in Cycle 1 where gefitinib was begun on Day 10. Results: In the first dose level (n=4, 37.5 mg of sunitinib and 250 mg of gefitinib), no DLTs were observed. In the second dose level (50 mg of sunitinib and 250 mg of gefitinib), there were 7 patients enrolled, but 1 patient had dose reduction for hypertension during the sunitinib monotherapy part of the study and was not included in the cohort defining MTD. 2 of 6 patients experienced a DLT (Grade 2 decline in ejection fraction, persistent Grade 3 fatigue) and the MTD was determined as 37.5 mg of sunitinib with 250 mg of gefitinib. Grade 3 adverse events included: diarrhea (n = 2) and hand/foot syndrome (n = 2). Laboratory abnormalities included grade 4 neutropenia (n = 1), grade 3 neutropenia (n = 2), and grade 3 thrombocytopenia (n = 2). Overall, 5 of 11 patients demonstrated a partial response and patient accrual to the phase 2 portion of the study is underway. Conclusions: The combination of sunitinib and gefitinib in mRCC patients was well tolerated and MTD was determined. The efficacy and toxicity of this combination is being assessed in a phase II component of this trial. [Table: see text]


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18201-18201
Author(s):  
S. De Santis ◽  
V. Donato ◽  
M. R. Migliorino ◽  
B. Tedesco ◽  
S. Condo ◽  
...  

18201 Background: Based on the several clinical trials, combined modality therapy became the standard of care for patients with stage III NSCLC “unresectable” with good performance status (Kathy S. Albain, Educational Book ASCO 2006, 453–461; Thomas E. Stinchcombe, Oncologist 2006, 11, 809–823). The most effective induction chemotherapy has yet to be determined. The objective of this prospective phase I study was to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and to evaluate the activity and safety of one of the third generation triplets as a full dose neoadjuvant regimen in patients (pts) with unresectable Stage III NSCLC. Methods: In this study, chemotherapy-naïve pts with stage IIIA-N2 bulky and IIIB (except malignant pleural effusion) NSCLC were eligible. Inclusion into the trial and treatment decisions were done by multidisciplinary panel involving surgeons, medical oncologists and radiotherapists. All drugs were given intravenously on days 1 and 8, and repeated every 3 weeks up to 2 cycles followed by concurrent chemoradiation. D (30–35 mg/m2) was given first, followed by C (35 mg/m2) and G (1000 mg/m2). Results: From Jan ‘06 to Jul ‘06 twelve eligible pts were enrolled, 10/2 m/f gender; median age 63 (50–72), 1 patient with ECOG PS 0, 11 pts with PS 1; 5 pts with stage IIIA-N2 bulky, 7 pts with stage IIIB NSCLC; nine pts were smokers. All pts were evaluable for toxicity. Toxicity grade 3–4 by CTC criteria was: grade 3 neutropenia in 2/3 patients and grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 1/3 patients on the second dose level of chemotherapy (i.e. docetaxel 35 mg/m2), and was considered dose-limiting. Of 9 pts treated at the MTD (i.e. docetaxel 30 mg/m2), only 1 patient developed grade 4 neutropenia and 1 patient grade 3 thrombocytopenia; 3 patients (30%) had grade 2 neutropenia and grade 2 stomatitis. Of 12 evaluable pts for response, after induction chemotherapy eighty-three percent of patients (9/12 pts) had an objective response and 16,6% (2/9 pts) stable disease. Phase II is continuing for larger patient accrual. Conclusions: The recommended doses for further phase II studies are D (30 mg/m2) followed by C (35 mg/m2) and G (1000 mg/m2) every 3 weeks. This regimen is well tolerated and effective, and appears to be an excellent choice for stage III NSCLC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document