scholarly journals Debating Pros and Cons of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (24) ◽  
pp. 6361
Author(s):  
Francesco Sclafani ◽  
Claudia Corrò ◽  
Thibaud Koessler
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Treatment Algorithm ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
Total Neoadjuvant Therapy

Recently, two large, randomised phase III clinical trials of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in locally advanced rectal cancer were published (RAPIDO and PRODIGE 23). These two trials compared short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) followed by chemotherapy with standard chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and chemotherapy followed by CRT with standard CRT, respectively. They showed improvement in some of the outcomes such as distant recurrence and pathological complete response (pCR). No improvement, however, was observed in local disease control or the de-escalation of surgical procedures. Although it seems lawful to integrate TNT within the treatment algorithm of localised stage II and III rectal cancer, many questions remain unanswered, including which are the optimal criteria to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from this intensive treatment. Instead of providing a sterile summary of trial results, we put these in perspective in a pros and cons manner. Moreover, we discuss some biological aspects of rectal cancer, which may provide some insights into the current decision-making process, and represent the basis for the future development of alternative, more effective treatment strategies.

Total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 662-662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Cercek ◽  
Campbell SD Roxburgh ◽  
Paul Strombom ◽  
Jesse Joshua Smith ◽  
Larissa K. F. Temple ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Treatment Strategy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Current Therapy ◽  
Average Dose ◽  
Total Neoadjuvant Therapy

662 Background: Current therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) consists of 6 months of perioperative therapy, either with pre-operative chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) and post operative adjuvant chemotherapy (PAC) or total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) with induction chemotherapy (ICT) followed by CRT then surgery. The aim of our study was to report on the safety, efficacy and complete response rates comparing TNT to PAC in a larger series of LARC patients (pts) at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC). Methods: Pts treated at MSKCC (2009-15) were analyzed based on the intended treatment schedule (TNT or PAC). 730 LARC pts were treated with CRT, of these 320 received neoadjuvant CRT and 308 received TNT. Results: In the TNT group 205 pts (73%) underwent surgery within 26 weeks of completion of treatment, of which 38 (19%) had a pCR. Of the 78 pts who did not undergo surgery within 26 weeks, 68 (87%) had a complete clinical response (cCR). In the PAC group 293 pts (92%) underwent surgery within 26 weeks and 45 (15%) had a pCR. Of the 27 pts who did not undergo surgery within 26 weeks 22 (81%) had a cCR. The median follow up was 25 mo in the TNT group and 29 mo in the PAC group. There was no statistically significant difference in the distant metastasis free survival between the treatment regimens, despite a higher number of cT4 and cN + tumors in the TNT group. Fewer distant recurrences were seen in pts who had evidence of T downstaging (P < 0.001), N downstaging (P < 0.005), the presence of a cCR (P = 0.005) or a pCR (P < 0.005). Of the pts who received all treatment at MSKCC, comparison of dose of 5-FU and oxaliplatin between the preoperative (N = 249) and postoperative regimens (N = 101) was notable for a higher average dose received of both 5FU and oxaliplatin (p < 0.005 and p < 0.001) in the ICT group. Conclusions: These data add weight to the evidence already included in the NCCN guidelines that pre-operative chemotherapy as part of TNT is a viable treatment strategy with superior compliance and delivery of systemic therapy. Given the high complete response rate, TNT may be used as part of an organ preservation treatment strategy.

scholarly journals Pathological Complete Response Following Different Neoadjuvant Treatment Strategies for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 4319-4336 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Hoendervangers ◽  
J. P. M. Burbach ◽  
M. M. Lacle ◽  
M. Koopman ◽  
W. M. U. van Grevenstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Pathological Complete Response ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Abstract Background Pathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is associated with better survival, less local recurrence, and less distant failure. Furthermore, pCR indicates that the rectum may have been preserved. This meta-analysis gives an overview of available neoadjuvant treatment strategies for LARC and analyzes how these perform in achieving pCR as compared with the standard of care. Methods Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Central bibliographic databases were searched. Randomized controlled trials in which patients received neoadjuvant treatment for MRI-staged nonmetastatic resectable LARC were included. The primary outcome was pCR, defined as ypT0N0. A meta-analysis of studies comparing an intervention with standard fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiation (CRT) was performed. Results Of the 17 articles included in the systematic review, 11 were used for the meta-analysis. Addition of oxaliplatin to fluoropyrimidine-based CRT resulted in significantly more pCR compared with fluoropyrimidine-based CRT only (OR 1.46), but at the expense of more ≥ grade 3 toxicity. Other treatment strategies, including consolidation/induction chemotherapy and short-course radiotherapy (SCRT), did not improve pCR rates. None of the included trials reported a benefit in local control or OS. Five-year DFS was significantly worse after SCRT-delay compared with CRT (59% vs. 75.1%, HR 1.93). Conclusions All included trials fail to deliver high-level evidence to show an improvement in pCR compared with standard fluoropyrimidine-based CRT. The addition of oxaliplatin might result in more pCR but at the expense of more toxicity. Furthermore, this benefit does not translate into less local recurrence or improved survival.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document