scholarly journals “Ain’t She a Bute?”: The Importance of Proper History Taking in a Case of Inappropriate Use of Horse NSAID in a Human

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 455-458
Author(s):  
Khalid Sawalha ◽  
Ryan James ◽  
Farah Mazahreh ◽  
Harmeen Goraya ◽  
Fuad Habash

A 41-year-old woman with no significant past medical history presented to the hospital with complaints of nausea, vomiting, and generalized weakness over two weeks. The patient did not seek medical attention as she assumed that her symptoms willwould resolve. Following her initial denial of drug abuse and her abnormal urine drug screening, we discussed the findings with the patient. She later admitted to using both amphetamines and marijuana. This led us to take a detailed social history that revealed an unexpected event.

Author(s):  
James Thomas ◽  
Tanya Monaghan ◽  
Prarthana Thiagarajan

History takingPresenting complaint (PC)Past medical history (PMH)Drug history (DHx)Allergies and reactionsAlcoholSmokingFamily history (FHx)Social history (SHx)Systematic enquiry (SE)Sexual historyThe elderly patient


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. 772-776 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald B. Hickson ◽  
William A. Altemeier ◽  
Elaine D. Martin ◽  
Preston W. Campbell

Nine infants with apparent life-threatening events that occurred as a result of poisoning by a caretaker are described. These episodes were characterized by apnea plus some combination of color change, choking or gagging, and abnormal muscle tone. Five of the infants responded to vigorous stimulation, and four required cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Most poisonings (seven infants) were detected by a urine drug screen. Medications detected included acetaminophen, amphetamine, benzodiazepines (two infants), cocaine, codeine, meperidine (two infants), Methadone, phenobarbital, and phenothiazines (three infants). Four infants received two or more drugs. Most perpetrators of the poisonings were mothers (seven) and five of the parents admitted administering the various agents. Reasons for the poisonings included an apparent attempt to harm an infant, the need to sedate a fussy infant, or a gross misunderstanding of the potential risk of various agents to infants. Because no history of drug administration was elicited at the time of hospital admission, six infants might have been discharged with a diagnosis of apnea of infancy had not an attempt been made to investigate the possibility of poisoning. These cases suggest that poisoning by a caretaker should be added to the differential diagnosis of any infant brought to medical attention because of an apparent lifethreatening event and that urine drug screening should be considered in the evaluation.


2001 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 18???22
Author(s):  
Albert Jekelis

Author(s):  
Tessa Rife ◽  
Christina Tat ◽  
Mahsa Malakootian

Abstract Purpose Guidelines recommend evaluating the risk of opioid-related adverse events prior to initiating opioid therapy. The orthopedic service at San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System (SFVHCS) has not routinely used risk assessment tools such as the Stratification Tool for Opioid Risk Mitigation, prescription drug monitoring program data, and urine drug screening prior to opioid prescribing. A quality improvement project was conducted to evaluate the number of pharmacist-provided opioid risk mitigation recommendations implemented by orthopedic providers for patients who underwent total hip or knee arthroplasty at SFVHCS. Summary A pharmacist-led workflow for completing risk mitigation reviews was developed in collaboration with orthopedic providers, and urine drug screening was added to the preoperative laboratory testing protocol. The following recommendations were communicated via electronic medical record: limit postoperative opioids to a 7- or 14-day supply based on risk of suicide and/or overdose, offer naloxone and a medication disposal bag, and order a urine drug screen if not already completed. Risk reviews were completed for 75 patients. Among 64 patients with 2-month postdischarge data available, 88% (7 of 8) of 7-day and 79% (44 of 56) of 14-day opioid supply recommendations were implemented; 41% (26 of 59) of recommendations to issue a medication disposal bag, 17% (2 of 12) recommendations to order a missing urine drug screen, and 9% (5 of 55) of recommendations to offer naloxone were implemented. Conclusion Pharmacist-performed risk mitigation reviews paired with individualized recommendations led to high rates of orthopedic provider acceptance of limiting postdischarge opioid day supplies for patients who had total hip or knee arthroplasty. Alternative strategies may increase access to naloxone. Future research should examine the impact of risk mitigation tools in reducing prescribing of long-term opioid therapy and adverse events among orthopedic surgical patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 2050313X2110132
Author(s):  
Alexandra Halalau ◽  
Madalina Halalau ◽  
Christopher Carpenter ◽  
Amr E Abbas ◽  
Matthew Sims

Vestibular neuritis is a disorder selectively affecting the vestibular portion of the eighth cranial nerve generally considered to be inflammatory in nature. There have been no reports of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 causing vestibular neuritis. We present the case of a 42-year-old Caucasian male physician, providing care to COVID-19 patients, with no significant past medical history, who developed acute vestibular neuritis, 2 weeks following a mild respiratory illness, later diagnosed as COVID-19. Physicians should keep severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 high on the list as a possible etiology when suspecting vestibular neuritis, given the extent and implications of the current pandemic and the high contagiousness potential.


2007 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
William B. Jaffee ◽  
Elisa Trucco ◽  
Sharon Levy ◽  
Roger D. Weiss

Author(s):  
Yi Qian ◽  
Yan Chen ◽  
Xiaoming Li

AbstractChronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) is a rare but serious myeloid malignancy. In a review of reported cases for WHO-defined CNL, CSF3R mutation is found in about 90% cases and confirmed as the molecular basis of CNL. Concurrent mutations are observed in CSF3R-mutated CNL patients, including ASXL1, SETBP1, SRSF2, JAK2, CALR, TET2, NRAS, U2AF1, and CBL. Both ASXL1 and SETBP1 mutations in CNL have been associated with a poor prognosis, whereas, SRSF2 mutation was undetermined. Our patient was a 77-year-old man and had no significant past medical history and symptoms with leukocytosis. Bone marrow (BM) aspirate and biopsy revealed a markedly hypercellular marrow with prominent left-shifted granulopoiesis. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of DNA from the BM aspirate of a panel of 28 genes, known to be pathogenic in MDS/MPN, detected mutations in CSF3R, SETBP1, and SRSF2, and a diagnosis of CNL was made. The patient did not use a JAK-STAT pathway inhibitor (ruxolitinib) but started on hydroxyurea and alpha-interferon and developed pruritus after 4 months of diagnosis and nasal hemorrhage 1 month later. Then, the patient was diagnosed with CNL with AML transformation and developed intracranial hemorrhage and died. We repeated NGS and found that three additional mutations were detected: ASXL1, PRKDC, MYOM2; variant allele frequency (VAF) of the prior mutations in CSF3R, SETBP1, and SRSF2 increased. The concurrence of CSF3RT618I, ASXL1, SETBP1, and SRSF2 mutation may be a mutationally detrimental combination and contribute to disease progression and AML transformation, as well as the nonspecific treatment of hydroxyurea and alpha-interferon, but the significance and role of PRKDC and MYOM2 mutations were not undetermined.


Author(s):  
Andrii Puzyrenko ◽  
Dan Wang ◽  
Randy Schneider ◽  
Greg Wallace ◽  
Sara Schreiber ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT This study investigated the presence of designer benzodiazepines in 35 urine specimens obtained from emergency department patients undergoing urine drug screening. All specimens showed apparent false-positive benzodiazepine screening results (i.e., confirmatory testing using a 19-component LC-MS/MS panel showed no prescribed benzodiazepines at detectable levels). The primary aims were to identify the possible presence of designer benzodiazepines, characterize the reactivity of commercially available screening immunoassays with designer benzodiazepines, and evaluate the risk of inappropriately ruling out designer benzodiazepine use when utilizing common urine drug screening and confirmatory tests. Specimens were obtained from emergency departments of a single US Health system. Following clinically ordered drug screening using Abbott ARCHITECT c assays and lab-developed LC-MS/MS confirmatory testing, additional characterization was performed for investigative purposes. Specifically, urine specimens were screened using two additional assays (Roche cobas c502, Siemens Dimension Vista) and LC-QTOF-MS to identify presumptively positive species, including benzodiazepines and non-benzodiazepines. Finally, targeted, qualitative LC-MS/MS was performed to confirm the presence of 12 designer benzodiazepines. Following benzodiazepine detection using the Abbott ARCHITECT, benzodiazepines were subsequently detected in 28/35 and 35/35 urine specimens, respectively, using Siemens and Roche assays. LC-QTOF-MS showed the presumptive presence of at least one non-FDA approved benzodiazepine in 30/35 specimens: flubromazolam (12/35), flualprazolam (11/35), flubromazepam (2/35), clonazolam (4/35), etizolam (9/35), metizolam (5/35), nitrazepam (1/35), and pyrazolam (1/35). Two or three designer benzodiazepines were detected concurrently in 13/35 specimens. Qualitative LC-MS/MS confirmed the presence of at least one designer benzodiazepine or metabolite in 23/35 specimens, with 3 specimens unavailable for confirmatory testing. Urine benzodiazepine screening assays from three manufacturers were cross-reactive with multiple non-US FDA-approved benzodiazepines. Clinical and forensic toxicology laboratories using traditionally designed LC-MS/MS panels may fail to confirm the presence of non-US FDA-approved benzodiazepines detected by screening assays, risking inappropriate interpretation of screening results as false-positives.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document