scholarly journals Three-Dimensional Urethral Profilometry—A Global Urethral Pressure Assessment Method

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 687
Author(s):  
Wioletta Katarzyna Szepieniec ◽  
Hanna Szweda ◽  
Maksym Wróblewski ◽  
Paweł Szymanowski

Background: To present a new method of urethral pressure examination, and to evaluate diagnostic capabilities of three-dimensional profilometry, as an alternative to classical urethral profile (UPP). Using five channel catheters and dedicated software, a global urethral pressure image is obtained. The method eliminates the main limitation of classical urethral profilometry, where the catheter orientation determines the pressure picture limited to only one point in the urethral circumference; we observed up to 50% differences in pressure measures depending on the point of urethral circumference where the measurement was taken. Methods: This is a preliminary study containing a method presentation and analysis of the use in varied clinical cases of either healthy patients or patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). The article includes a technique and equipment description and a full evaluation of selected cases, including three-dimensional urethral pressure distribution graphics. Results and Conclusions: Three-dimensional profilometry compared to the classical technique is comparable regarding the time, cost, technical difficulty and patient discomfort. At the same time, we obtained much more data on the urethral pressure and its distribution. The results are easy to interpret due to the 3D movable graphics created automatically by the dedicated software.

2008 ◽  
Vol 49 (8) ◽  
pp. 715
Author(s):  
Hyang Sik Choi ◽  
Chang Min Im ◽  
Sun Ouck Kim ◽  
Myung Ki Kim ◽  
Dong Deuk Kwon ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-58
Author(s):  
Chin-Jui Wu ◽  
Wan-Hua Ting ◽  
Ho-Hsiung Lin ◽  
Sheng-Mou Hsiao

Purpose: The Q-tip test is used to measure urethral hypermobility and can predict surgical outcomes. However, certain factors may affect the reliability of this test. Our aim was to identify independent clinical and urodynamic predictors of the results of the Q-tip test.Methods: Between January 2014 and June 2019, 176 consecutive women with lower urinary tract symptoms who underwent the Q-tip test and urodynamic studies were included in this retrospective study.Results: Multivariable regression analysis revealed that age (regression coefficient, -0.55), point Ba (regression coefficient, 4.1), urodynamic stress incontinence (regression coefficient, 9.9), maximum flow rate (Qmax) (regression coefficient, 0.13), pressure transmission ratio (PTR) at maximum urethral pressure (MUP) (regression coefficient, -0.14), and the score on the fifth question of the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQQ5; “Has urine leakage affected your participation in social activities outside your home?”; regression coefficient, -4.1) were independent predictors of the Q-tip angle, with a constant of 87.0. The following Spearman rank correlation coefficients were found between the Q-tip angle and the following variables: age, -0.38; point Ba, 0.34; urodynamic stress incontinence, 0.32; Qmax, 0.28; PTR at MUP, -0.28; and IIQQ5, -0.23. A receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis for the prediction of urodynamic stress incontinence found that the optimum cutoff for PTR at MUP was <81%, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.70.Conclusions: Age, point Ba, urodynamic stress incontinence, Qmax, PTR at MUP, and IIQQ5 were independent predictors of the Q-tip angle. However, none of these could be used as effective surrogates for the Q-tip test due to their lack of a sufficient correlation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document