scholarly journals The Contributory Role of Cell Blocks in Salivary Gland Neoplasms Fine Needle Aspirations Classified by the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytology

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1778
Author(s):  
Erkka Tommola ◽  
David Kalfert ◽  
Heli Hakso-Mäkinen ◽  
Ivana Kholová
Keyword(s):  
Salivary Gland ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Malignant Neoplasm ◽  
Salivary Gland Neoplasm ◽  
Cytological Diagnosis ◽  
Fine Needle

(1) Background: The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) was introduced in 2018, bringing an organ-specific classification system for salivary gland cytopathology. The aim of present study is to evaluate the MSRSGC prospectively, based on a two-year experience in the tertiary care center pathology department, and evaluate the role of routine cell block (CB) preparation in salivary gland cytopathological diagnostics. (2) Methods: In our institution, the Department of Pathology, Fimlab Laboratories, Tampere, Finland, the MSRSGC has been implemented in salivary gland cytopathology since January 2018 and, over a two-year period (January 2018–December 2019), there were 365 fine-needle aspirations, of which 164 had a surgical follow-up. The CB methods used were Plasma-thrombin, the collection of visible fragments, and the Shandon and in-house methods. (3) Results: The MSRSGC diagnostic figures were as follows: accuracy 87.5%, sensitivity 45.8% and specificity 98.9%. For diagnostic categories of MSRSGC (non-neoplastic, benign neoplasm and malignant neoplasm) (n = 63) diagnostic accuracy was 98.4%, and for undetermined categories (atypia of undetermined significance, salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential and suspicious for malignancy) (n = 49) diagnostic accuracy was 73.5%. Non-contributory cell blocks resulted more often in a false negative diagnosis (25%, 3/12) than a true negative diagnosis (10%, 7/73, p < 0.001), and is, most likely, an insufficient cytological diagnosis (86%, 18/21, p < 0.001). (4) Conclusion: The application of MSRSGC and CBs are beneficial in salivary gland cytological diagnosis, increasing diagnostic accuracy and, thus, patients’ management and treatment.

A comparison between 25-gauge and 22-gauge Franseen needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic and peripancreatic masses: a randomized non-inferiority study

Endoscopy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dongwook Oh ◽  
Joonseog Kong ◽  
Sung Woo Ko ◽  
Seung-Mo Hong ◽  
Hoonsub So ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Endoscopic Ultrasound ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Fine Needle Biopsy ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Adverse Event Rate ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Fine Needle

Abstract Background Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and fine-needle biopsy (FNB) are the current standard of care for sampling pancreatic and peripancreatic masses. Recently, a 22G EUS-FNB needle with Franseen geometry was developed, and this device was also introduced in a 25G platform. We compared the performance of the 25G and 22G Franseen needles for EUS-guided sampling of pancreatic and peripancreatic solid masses. Methods We conducted a parallel-group randomized non-inferiority trial at a tertiary-care center from November 2018 to May 2019. The primary outcome was the quality of the histologic core assessed using the Gerke score. The optimal histologic core is indicated by a Gerke score of 4 or 5, which enables optimal histologic interpretation. The overall diagnostic accuracy and adverse event rate were also evaluated. Results 140 patients were enrolled and randomized (1:1) to the 25G and 22G groups. Tissue acquisition by EUS-FNB was successful in all patients. The optimal histologic core procurement rate was 87.1 % (61/70) for the 25G needle vs. 97.1 % (68/70) for the 22G; difference −10 % (95 % confidence interval −17.35 % to −2.65 %). High quality specimens were more frequently obtained in the 22G group than in the 25G group (70.0 % [49/70] vs. 28.6 % [20 /70], respectively; P < 0.001). The overall diagnostic accuracy did not differ between the groups (97.4 % for 25G vs. 100 % for 22G). Conclusions The 25G Franseen needle was inferior to the 22G needle in histologic core procurement. Therefore, for cases in which tissue architecture is pivotal for diagnosis, a 22G needle, which procures relatively higher quality specimens than the 25G needle, should be used.

scholarly journals Risk stratification by application of Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology: A tertiary care experience

CytoJournal ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Jyotsna Naresh Bharti ◽  
Poonam Elhence ◽  
Meenakshi Rao ◽  
Aasma Nalwa ◽  
Sudeep Khera
Keyword(s):  
Salivary Gland ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Method ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Diagnostic Category ◽  
Malignant Neoplasm ◽  
Diagnostic Categories ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Objectives: The Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology (MSRSGC) classification has been proposed to improve reproducibility in the management of salivary gland lesions. Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a widely accepted, well-tolerated, cost-effective, minimally invasive diagnostic method for pre-operative evaluation of salivary gland lesion that aids management decisions. The present study aims to reclassify the salivary gland FNAC aspirates by applying MSRSGC and calculating the risk of neoplasm and malignancy for each diagnostic category. Material and Methods: The present study is a retrospective observational study done for 54 months. A total of 168 cases of salivary gland FNA, 54 cases were excised in our institute for histopathology. Retrospective reviews were performed, and the FNAC cases were reclassified according to the Milan system, and the results of FNAC and final histology were correlated, wherever available. Furthermore, the risk of malignancy was calculated for all the diagnostic categories. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy (DA) of FNAC were determined. Results: In the present study, the age of patients ranged from 3 to 86 years, with a mean age of 39 years. Among all the patients, 61.3% were male, and 38.6% were female. However, only 54 salivary gland FNA samples for which histopathology was available were categorized into six categories. Among them, category IV (neoplastic) had a maximum number of cases of 66.6%. The rate of malignancy was calculated for all diagnostic categories as follows: (1) Non-diagnostic: 0.0%, (2) non-neoplastic 0.0%, (3) atypia of undermined significance 100%, (4a) benign 5.5%, (4b) uncertain malignant potential 33.33%, (5) suspicious for malignancy 00%, and (6) malignancy 80%. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and DA for differentiating between benign and malignant neoplasm were 36.3%, 94.4%, 66.6%, 82.9%, and 80%. Two false-positive and seven false-negative neoplastic cases were noted. Conclusion: FNAC is a reliable, minimally invasive diagnostic method with high DA for diagnosing salivary gland lesions. Most salivary gland lesions can be accurately diagnosed on FNAC with adequate sampling and cytopathologists experience.

scholarly journals Role of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) in Preoperative Diagnosis of Parotid and Submandibular Gland Neoplasm

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-129
Author(s):  
Mohammad Nazrul Islam ◽  
AF Mohiuddin Khan ◽  
Shaikh Nurul Fattah ◽  
Dipankar Lodh ◽  
Md Zahirul Islam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Salivary Gland ◽  
Submandibular Gland ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Salivary Gland Neoplasm ◽  
Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Needle Aspiration Cytology

Background: The overall incidence of salivary gland neoplasm is 2.5-3.0 per 100000 per year. Salivary gland malignancies account for about 5% of head-neck malignancies. Though, it is uncommon but not rare in our country. Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) has been widely used for many years as a method for assessing salivary gland lesion preoperatively. It is a simple, quick, inexpensive and minimally invasive technique used to diagnose different types of salivary gland neoplasm. Objectives: To see the frequency of malignancy in parotid and submandibular salivary gland neoplasm and also to find out the role of FNAC in their preoperative diagnosis. Histopathological examination of the resected parotid and submandibular gland neoplasm was considered as gold standard to compare FNAC report of this study. Methods: This was a cross – sectional study which was conducted in the Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka from January 2017 to June 2018. Purposive sampling method was used to collect data. Pre-tested structured data sheet was used to record information. After collection, data were edited by meticulous checking and re-checking. Data were analyzed using SPSS for windows version 22. Results: After histopathological confirmation of the resected specimen, most common benign parotid tumour was pleomorphic adenoma 76.7% followed by warthin’s tumour 16.7%. In benign submandibular gland neoplasm, pleomorphic adenoma was the commones 87.5% followed by haemangioma 12.5%. Commonest malignant tumour of submandibular gland was adenoid cystic carcinoma 50.0%. In our study sensitivity of FNAC was 75.0%, specificity 94.74% and overall accuracy was 90%. Positive predictive value and negative value were 81.82% and 92.31% respectively. Conclusion: It can be concluded that fine needle aspiration cytology is a safe, cheap and useful preoperative diagnostic tool in the diagnosis of malignancy in parotid and submandibular gland, but as fine needle aspiration cytology partly depends on operator skill, it may give false negative and false positive result. Bangladesh J Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 27(2): 124-129

Pitfalls in Salivary Gland Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology: Lessons From the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Nongynecologic Cytology

2005 ◽  
Vol 129 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan H. Hughes ◽  
Emily E. Volk ◽  
David C. Wilbur
Keyword(s):  
Salivary Gland ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
False Positive ◽  
Interlaboratory Comparison ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Diagnostic Errors ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Fine Needle

Abstract Context.—We use data from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Nongynecologic Cytology to identify common diagnostic errors in salivary gland fine-needle aspiration (FNA). Objective.—To identify salivary gland FNA cases with poor performance characteristics in the Nongynecologic Cytology Program surveys, so that the most common diagnostic pitfalls can be avoided. Design.—A retrospective review of the College of American Pathologists Nongynecologic Cytology Program's cumulative data from 1999 to 2003 revealed the most common false-positive and false-negative interpretations on FNA for common salivary gland lesions. Slides that performed poorly were then reviewed to identify the cytologic characteristics that may have contributed to their poor performance. Results.—A total of 6249 participant responses with general interpretations of benign (n = 4642) or malignant (n= 1607) were reviewed. The sensitivity and specificity of the participant responses for correctly interpreting the cases as benign or malignant were 73% and 91%, respectively. Benign cases with the highest false-positive rates were monomorphic adenoma (53% false-positive), intraparotid lymph node (36%), oncocytoma (18%), and granulomatous sialadenitis (10%). Malignant cases with the highest false-negative rates were lymphoma (57%), acinic cell carcinoma (49%), low-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma (43%), and adenoid cystic carcinoma (33%). Selected review of the most discordant individual cases revealed possible explanations for some of the interpretative errors. Conclusions.—These data confirm the difficulty associated with interpretation of salivary gland FNA specimens. Cytologists should be aware of the potential false-positive and false-negative interpretations that can occur in FNAs from this organ site in order to minimize the possibility of diagnostic errors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document