scholarly journals Detrital Zircon Provenance and Lithofacies Associations of Montmorillonitic Sands in the Maastrichtian Ripley Formation: Implications for Mississippi Embayment Paleodrainage Patterns and Paleogeography

Geosciences ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 80
Author(s):  
Jennifer N. Gifford ◽  
Elizabeth J. Vitale ◽  
Brian F. Platt ◽  
David H. Malone ◽  
Inoka H. Widanagamage
Keyword(s):  
Mississippi River ◽  
Detrital Zircon ◽  
Drainage System ◽  
Clay Mineralogy ◽  
Foreland Basin ◽  
Mississippi Embayment ◽  
Fluvial Systems ◽  
Source Regions ◽  
Cretaceous Volcanism ◽  
Appalachian Foreland

We provide new detrital zircon evidence to support a Maastrichtian age for the establishment of the present-day Mississippi River drainage system. Fieldwork conducted in Pontotoc County, Mississippi, targeted two sites containing montmorillonitic sand in the Maastrichtian Ripley Formation. U-Pb detrital zircon (DZ) ages from these sands (n = 649) ranged from Mesoarchean (~2870 Ma) to Pennsylvanian (~305 Ma) and contained ~91% Appalachian-derived grains, including Appalachian–Ouachita, Gondwanan Terranes, and Grenville source terranes. Other minor source regions include the Mid-Continent Granite–Rhyolite Province, Yavapai–Mazatzal, Trans-Hudson/Penokean, and Superior. This indicates that sediment sourced from the Appalachian Foreland Basin (with very minor input from a northern or northwestern source) was being routed through the Mississippi Embayment (MSE) in the Maastrichtian. We recognize six lithofacies in the field areas interpreted as barrier island to shelf environments. Statistically significant differences between DZ populations and clay mineralogy from both sites indicate that two distinct fluvial systems emptied into a shared back-barrier setting, which experienced volcanic ash input. The stratigraphic positions of the montmorillonitic sands suggest that these deposits represent some of the youngest Late Cretaceous volcanism in the MSE.

Late Cretaceous sediment provenance in the eastern Gulf Coastal Plain (U.S.A.) based on detrital-zircon U-Pb ages and Th/U values

2021 ◽  
Vol 91 (10) ◽  
pp. 1025-1039
Author(s):  
William T. Jackson ◽  
Matthew P. McKay ◽  
Donald A. Beebe ◽  
Carolyn Mullins ◽  
Adelie Ionescu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Late Cretaceous ◽  
Coastal Plain ◽  
Detrital Zircon ◽  
Detrital Zircons ◽  
Sediment Provenance ◽  
Gulf Coastal Plain ◽  
Spatiotemporal Resolution ◽  
Mississippi Embayment ◽  
Continental Scale ◽  
Appalachian Foreland

ABSTRACT Detrital-zircon U-Pb geochronology documents a regional- to continental-scale drainage reorganization along the eastern Gulf Coastal Plain (USA) from the Late Cretaceous (Cenomanian) to the Paleocene–Eocene. We present detrital-zircon U-Pb ages and Th/U values from the Maastrichtian Ripley Formation to determine the sedimentary provenance and to provide spatiotemporal resolution of drainage reorganization. The Ripley Formation contains a 12.7% overall average abundance of detrital zircons with low (< 0.1) Th/U values relative to the underlying Cenomanian Tuscaloosa Group (3.6%), the overlying Paleocene–Eocene Wilcox Group (2.8%), an Appalachian foreland composite (2.1%), and the laterally equivalent McNairy Sandstone in the northern Mississippi Embayment (3.8%). Multidimensional scaling of detrital-zircon U-Pb spectra shows that the Ripley Formation is dissimilar from underlying and overlying Gulf Coastal Plain units, the McNairy Sandstone, and an Appalachian foreland composite sample because of differences in proportions of Appalachian (490–270 Ma) and Grenville (1250–900 Ma) zircons. We interpret the southern Appalachian Piedmont province as the principal sediment source region for the Ripley Formation to account for the elevated abundance of grains with low (< 0.1) Th/U values and unique detrital-zircon U-Pb age spectra. Results suggest a regional-scale (105 km2) drainage network, which delivered sediment to the Maastrichtian coast followed by northwestward littoral transport and eventual mixing with Appalachian foreland-derived sediment in the northern Mississippi Embayment. This study further brackets drainage reorganization along the eastern Gulf Coastal Plain and demonstrates how simple chemical–age relationships, such as zircon Th/U values coupled with U-Pb ages, can be used to evaluate sediment provenance.

scholarly journals Interpreting large detrital geochronology data sets in retroarc foreland basins: An example from the Magallanes-Austral Basin, southernmost Patagonia

Lithosphere ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 620-642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary T. Sickmann ◽  
Theresa M. Schwartz ◽  
Matthew A. Malkowski ◽  
Stephen C. Dobbs ◽  
Stephan A. Graham
Keyword(s):  
Multidimensional Scaling ◽  
Detrital Zircon ◽  
Foreland Basin ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Foreland Basins ◽  
Dispersal Patterns ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Sediment Dispersal ◽  
Source Regions ◽  
Provenance Data

Abstract The Magallanes-Austral retroarc foreland basin of southernmost South America presents an excellent setting in which to examine interpretive methods for large detrital zircon data sets. The source regions for retroarc foreland basins generally, and the Magallanes-Austral Basin specifically, can be broadly divided into (1) the magmatic arc, (2) the fold-and-thrust belt, and (3) sources around the periphery of foreland flexural subsidence. In this study, we used an extensive detrital zircon data set (30 new, 87 previously published samples) that is complemented by a large modal provenance data set of 183 sandstone petrography samples (32 new, 151 previously published) and rare earth element geochemical analyses (130 previously published samples) to compare the results of empirical (multidimensional scaling) and interpretive (age binning based on source regions) treatments of detrital zircon data, ultimately to interpret the detailed evolution of sediment dispersal patterns and their tectonic controls in the Magallanes-Austral Basin. Detrital zircon sample groupings based on both a priori age binning and multidimensional scaling are required to maximize the potential of the Magallanes-Austral Basin data set. Multidimensional scaling results are sensitive to differences in major unimodal arc-related U-Pb detrital zircon ages and less sensitive to differences in multimodal, thrust belt–related age peaks. These sensitivities complicate basin-scale interpretations when data from poorly understood, less densely sampled sectors are compared to data from better-understood, more densely sampled sectors. Source region age binning alleviates these biases and compares well with multidimensional scaling results when samples from the less well-understood southern basin sector are excluded. Sample groupings generated by both multidimensional scaling and interpretive methods are also compatible with compositional provenance data. Together, this integration of provenance data and methods facilitates a detailed interpretation of sediment dispersal patterns and their tectonic controls for the Late Cretaceous to Eocene fill of the Magallanes-Austral retroarc foreland basin. We interpret that provenance signatures and dispersal patterns during the retroarc foreland phase were fundamentally controlled by conditions set by a predecessor extensional basin phase, including (1) variable magnitude of extension with latitude, (2) the composition of lithologies emplaced on the antecedent western flank, and (3) long-lasting structural discontinuities associated with early rifting that may have partitioned dispersal systems or controlled the location of long-lived drainage networks.

Multiproxy records on the fluvial successions of Assam-Arakan Basin: Implication for paleo-drainage evolution

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priti Rai ◽  
Biraj Borgohain ◽  
George Mathew
Keyword(s):  
Detrital Zircon ◽  
Drainage System ◽  
Foreland Basin ◽  
River System ◽  
Heavy Mineral ◽  
Heavy Minerals ◽  
Brahmaputra River ◽  
Electron Probe Micro Analyzer ◽  
Fluvial Sedimentation ◽  
Namche Barwa

<p>Assam-Arakan Basin comprises Cenozoic sedimentary successions, located in northeastern India is juxtaposed to both the Himalaya and Indo-Burman Ranges (IBR). The Upper Miocene-Pliocene (Tipam sandstone) and the overlying younger Upper Pliocene-Pleistocene units (Dupi-Tila/Namsang/Dihing) of this foreland basin are fluvial successions. Heavy mineral as detritus provenance indicator has been used as one of the multiproxy records on the fluvial sequences of Assam-Arakan Basin to unravel the drainage system that deposited the same in this basin. Previous workers have advocated that the paleo-Brahmaputra river had initially flowed east of Shillong Plateau before being deflected northwesterly taking the present-day course parallel to the Plateau. However, unequivocal evidence of paleo-Brahmaputra remains enigmatic. The study demonstrates the provenance for the fluvial sedimentary units of the above foreland basin using petrography and heavy mineral distributions. X-ray Diffraction (XRD) and Electron Probe Micro Analyzer (EPMA) analyses were employed to correctly identify the heavy mineral species and support the semi-quantitative analysis of heavy minerals in the basin. The outcome of the study provides new insights towards the paleo-drainage evolution of the river course accountable for the fluvial sedimentation in the Assam-Arakan Basin. Clast petrography and heavy mineral observations indicate the probable source from Lohit- Dibang valley. Initial analysis of detrital zircon U-Pb ages from studied samples reveals major age peaks at around 500 Ma and 1025 Ma with young ages between 16 Ma and ~140 Ma. These samples do not provide ages < 10 Ma, signifying the sediments not derived from Namche Barwa massif, eroded by the Tsangpo-Siang-Brahmaputra river system. It is in contrast to similar sediments in the Siwaliks of NE Himalaya. The data supports our observation that the paleo-Brahmaputra seems not the cause for these deposits, at least during the Pleistocene. If Paleo-Brahmaputra got diverted during this period, it requires scanning the detritus from Tipam units and additional samples from Dupi-Tila/Namsang/Dihing units across the entire Assam-Arakan range to infer source and drainage system for these deposits. We tentatively propose that the Tipam and the younger Dupi-Tila/Namsang/Dihing units in the Assam-Arakan Basin were deposited by drainage flowing from Dibang-Tezu valley, that was initially linked to the Irrawaddy river system. The uplift along Naga thrust caused drainage migration, eventually meeting the present-day Brahmaputra course.</p><p>Keywords: Heavy mineral; Detrital zircon U-Pb ages; Paleo-Brahmaputra; Assam-Arakan Basin</p>

scholarly journals Detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology of modern Andean rivers in Ecuador: Fingerprinting tectonic provinces and assessing downstream propagation of provenance signals

Geosphere ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 1943-1957 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lily J. Jackson ◽  
Brian K. Horton ◽  
Cristian Vallejo
Keyword(s):  
Detrital Zircon ◽  
Foreland Basin ◽  
High Elevation ◽  
Tectonic Deformation ◽  
Thrust Belt ◽  
Environmental Signals ◽  
Magmatic Arc ◽  
Metasedimentary Rocks ◽  
Unconsolidated Sands ◽  
Source Regions

Abstract Recognizing detrital contributions from sediment source regions is fundamental to provenance studies of active and ancient orogenic settings. Detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology of unconsolidated sands from modern rivers that have source catchments with contrasting bedrock signatures provides insight into the fidelity of U-Pb age signatures in discriminating tectonic provenance and downstream propagation of environmental signals. We present 1705 new detrital zircon U-Pb ages for 15 samples of unconsolidated river sands from 12 modern rivers over a large spatial extent of Ecuador (∼1°N–5°S and ∼79°–77°W). Results show distinctive U-Pb age distributions with characteristic zircon age populations for various tectonic provinces along the Andean convergent margin, including the forearc, magmatic arc, and internal (hinterland) and external (foreland) segments of the fold-thrust belt. (1) Forearc and magmatic arc (Western Cordillera) river sands are characterized by Neogene–Quaternary age populations from magmatic sources. (2) Rivers in the hinterland (Eastern Cordillera) segment of the Andean fold-thrust belt have substantial populations of Proterozoic and Paleozoic ages, representing upper Paleozoic–Mesozoic sedimentary and metasedimentary rocks of ultimate cratonic origin. (3) River sands in the frontal fold-thrust belt (Subandean Zone to Oriente Basin) show distinctive bimodal Jurassic age populations, a secondary Triassic population, and subordinate Early Cretaceous ages representative of Mesozoic plutonic and metamorphic bedrock. Detrital zircon U-Pb results from a single regional watershed (Rio Pastaza) spanning the magmatic arc to foreland basin show drastic downstream variations, including the downstream loss of magmatic arc and hinterland signatures and abrupt introduction and dominance of selected sources within the fold-thrust belt. Disproportionate contributions from Mesozoic crystalline metamorphic rocks, which form high-elevation, high-relief areas subject to focused precipitation and active tectonic deformation, are likely the product of focused erosion and high volumes of local sediment input from the frontal fold-thrust belt, leading to dilution of upstream signatures from the hinterland and magmatic arc.

scholarly journals Grand Canyon provenance for orthoquartzite clasts in the lower Miocene of coastal southern California

Geosphere ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 1973-1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leah Sabbeth ◽  
Brian P. Wernicke ◽  
Timothy D. Raub ◽  
Jeffrey A. Grover ◽  
E. Bruce Lander ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Detrital Zircon ◽  
Mojave Desert ◽  
Drainage System ◽  
Grand Canyon ◽  
Death Valley ◽  
Source Population ◽  
Source Regions ◽  
Detrital Zircon Ages ◽  
Central Arizona ◽  
Rule Out

Abstract Orthoquartzite detrital source regions in the Cordilleran interior yield clast populations with distinct spectra of paleomagnetic inclinations and detrital zircon ages that can be used to trace the provenance of gravels deposited along the western margin of the Cordilleran orogen. An inventory of characteristic remnant magnetizations (CRMs) from >700 sample cores from orthoquartzite source regions defines a low-inclination population of Neoproterozoic–Paleozoic age in the Mojave Desert–Death Valley region (and in correlative strata in Sonora, Mexico) and a moderate- to high-inclination population in the 1.1 Ga Shinumo Formation in eastern Grand Canyon. Detrital zircon ages can be used to distinguish Paleoproterozoic to mid-Mesoproterozoic (1.84–1.20 Ga) clasts derived from the central Arizona highlands region from clasts derived from younger sources that contain late Mesoproterozoic zircons (1.20–1.00 Ga). Characteristic paleomagnetic magnetizations were measured in 44 densely cemented orthoquartzite clasts, sampled from lower Miocene portions of the Sespe Formation in the Santa Monica and Santa Ana mountains and from a middle Eocene section in Simi Valley. Miocene Sespe clast inclinations define a bimodal population with modes near 15° and 45°. Eight samples from the steeper Miocene mode for which detrital zircon spectra were obtained all have spectra with peaks at 1.2, 1.4, and 1.7 Ga. One contains Paleozoic and Mesozoic peaks and is probably Jurassic. The remaining seven define a population of clasts with the distinctive combination of moderate to high inclination and a cosmopolitan age spectrum with abundant grains younger than 1.2 Ga. The moderate to high inclinations rule out a Mojave Desert–Death Valley or Sonoran region source population, and the cosmopolitan detrital zircon spectra rule out a central Arizona highlands source population. The Shinumo Formation, presently exposed only within a few hundred meters elevation of the bottom of eastern Grand Canyon, thus remains the only plausible, known source for the moderate- to high-inclination clast population. If so, then the Upper Granite Gorge of the eastern Grand Canyon had been eroded to within a few hundred meters of its current depth by early Miocene time (ca. 20 Ma). Such an unroofing event in the eastern Grand Canyon region is independently confirmed by (U-Th)/He thermochronology. Inclusion of the eastern Grand Canyon region in the Sespe drainage system is also independently supported by detrital zircon age spectra of Sespe sandstones. Collectively, these data define a mid-Tertiary, SW-flowing “Arizona River” drainage system between the rapidly eroding eastern Grand Canyon region and coastal California.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document