scholarly journals Estimation of Daily Potential Evapotranspiration in Real-Time from GK2A/AMI Data Using Artificial Neural Network for the Korean Peninsula

Hydrology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 129
Author(s):  
Jae-Cheol Jang ◽  
Eun-Ha Sohn ◽  
Ki-Hong Park ◽  
Soobong Lee

Evapotranspiration (ET) is a fundamental factor in energy and hydrologic cycles. Although highly precise in-situ ET monitoring is possible, such data are not always available due to the high spatiotemporal variability in ET. This study estimates daily potential ET (PET) in real-time for the Korean Peninsula, via an artificial neural network (ANN), using data from the GEO-KOMPSAT 2A satellite, which is equipped with an Advanced Meteorological Imager (GK2A/AMI). We also used passive microwave data, numerical weather prediction (NWP) model data, and static data. The ANN-based PET model was trained using data for the period 25 July 2019 to 24 July 2020, and was tested by comparing with in-situ PET for the period 25 July 2020 to 31 July 2021. In terms of accuracy, the PET model performed well, with root-mean-square error (RMSE), bias, and Pearson’s correlation coefficient (R) of 0.649 mm day−1, −0.134 mm day−1, and 0.954, respectively. To examine the efficiency of the GK2A/AMI-derived PET data, we compared it with in-situ ET measured at flux towers and with MODIS PET data. The accuracy of the GK2A/AMI-derived PET, in comparison with the flux tower-measured ET, showed RMSE, bias, and Pearson’s R of 1.730 mm day−1, 1.212 mm day−1, and 0.809, respectively. In comparison with the in-situ PET, the ANN model produced more accurate estimates than the MODIS data, indicating that it is more locally optimized for the Korean Peninsula than MODIS. This study advances the field by applying an ANN approach using GK2A/AMI data and could play an important role in examining hydrologic energy for air-land interactions.

Author(s):  
Nisha Thakur ◽  
Sanjeev Karmakar ◽  
Sunita Soni

The present review reports the work done by the various authors towards rainfall forecasting using the different techniques within Artificial Neural Network concepts. Back-Propagation, Auto-Regressive Moving Average (ARIMA), ANN , K- Nearest Neighbourhood (K-NN), Hybrid model (Wavelet-ANN), Hybrid Wavelet-NARX model, Rainfall-runoff models, (Two-stage optimization technique), Adaptive Basis Function Neural Network (ABFNN), Multilayer perceptron, etc., algorithms/technologies were reviewed. A tabular representation was used to compare the above-mentioned technologies for rainfall predictions. In most of the articles, training and testing, accuracy was found more than 95%. The rainfall prediction done using the ANN techniques was found much superior to the other techniques like Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) and Statistical Method because of the non-linear and complex physical conditions affecting the occurrence of rainfall.


Author(s):  
Muhammad Zilal Bin Ab Hamid Pahmi ◽  
Afida Ayob ◽  
Shaheer Ansari ◽  
Mohamad Hanif Md Saad ◽  
Aini Hussain

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document