scholarly journals Analysis of the Effect of Backpack Design with Reduced Load Moment Arm on Spinal Alignment

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (22) ◽  
pp. 4351
Author(s):  
Kyung-hun Kim ◽  
Jihyeon Ann ◽  
Sang-hun Jang
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Lordosis ◽  
Pelvic Incidence ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Center Of Gravity ◽  
The Body ◽  
Moment Arm ◽  
Spinal Alignment ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Sagittal Spinal Alignment ◽  
Significant Difference

In this study, we designed a backpack that can reduce the moment arm of backpack load by placing the center of gravity of the backpack close to the axis of the spine. In order to investigate the effect of sagittal spinal alignment compared with the general backpack, we conducted the study using radiological images. The participants in this study were 18 adults (8 males and 10 females). The subjects participated in the experiment without carrying the backpack, wearing the normal backpack, and wearing a backpack designed to reduce the load moment arm by placing the center of gravity close to the body. Spinal alignment parameters were measured and analyzed using 3D radiography measurement software based on radiographic images taken under three conditions. The overall angle of lumbar lordosis, upper arc, lower arc, difference between pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis, lower cervical lordosis, and sagittal vertical axis were measured. In the case of wearing the backpack rather than without the backpack, there was a significant difference in the overall angle of lumbar lordosis, lower arc, lower cervical spine angle, difference between pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis, and sagittal vertical axis. In the case of wearing the backpack with reduced moment arm, the overall angle and lower arc of lumbar lordosis were significantly increased compared to those with the normal backpack. The difference between pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis was significantly decreased. The results showed that a normal backpack caused imbalance of sagittal spinal alignment, and the backpack reducing the load moment arm by placing the backpack’s center of gravity close to the vertebral joint played a positive role in reducing the change of lumbar alignment compared with the normal backpack.

The utility of supine radiographs in the assessment of thoracic flexibility and risk of proximal junctional kyphosis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Francis Lovecchio ◽  
Renaud Lafage ◽  
Jonathan Charles Elysee ◽  
Alex Huang ◽  
Bryan Ang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thoracic Spine ◽  
Lumbar Lordosis ◽  
Pelvic Tilt ◽  
Pelvic Incidence ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Control Analysis ◽  
Proximal Junctional Kyphosis ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Junctional Kyphosis

OBJECTIVE Supine radiographs have successfully been used for preoperative planning of lumbar deformity corrections. However, they have not been used to assess thoracic flexibility, which has recently garnered attention as a potential contributor to proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK). The purpose of this study was to compare supine to standing radiographs to assess thoracic flexibility and to determine whether thoracic flexibility is associated with PJK. METHODS A retrospective study was conducted of a single-institution database of patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). Sagittal alignment parameters were compared between standing and supine and between pre- and postoperative radiographs. Thoracic flexibility was determined as the change between preoperative standing thoracic kyphosis (TK) and preoperative supine TK, and these changes were measured over the overall thoracic spine and the fused portion of the thoracic spine (i.e., TK fused). A case-control analysis was performed to compare thoracic flexibility between patients with PJK and those without (no PJK). The cohort was also stratified into three groups based on thoracic flexibility: kyphotic change (increased TK), lordotic change (decreased TK), and no change. The PJK rate was compared between the cohorts. RESULTS A total of 101 patients (mean 63 years old, 82.2% female, mean BMI 27.4 kg/m2) were included. Preoperative Scoliosis Research Society–Schwab ASD classification showed moderate preoperative deformity (pelvic tilt 27.7% [score ++]; pelvic incidence–lumbar lordosis mismatch 44.6% [score ++]; sagittal vertical axis 42.6% [score ++]). Postoperatively, the average offset from age-adjusted alignment goals demonstrated slight overcorrection in the study sample (−8.5° ± 15.6° pelvic incidence–lumbar lordosis mismatch, −29.2 ± 53.1 mm sagittal vertical axis, −5.4 ± 10.8 pelvic tilt, and −7.6 ± 11.7 T1 pelvic angle). TK decreased between standing and supine radiographs and increased postoperatively (TK fused: −25.3° vs −19.6° vs −29.9°; all p < 0.001). The overall rate of radiographic PJK was 23.8%. Comparisons between PJK and no PJK demonstrated that offsets from age-adjusted alignment goals were similar (p > 0.05 for all). There was a significant difference in the PJK rate when stratified by thoracic flexibility cohorts (kyphotic: 0.0% vs no change: 18.4% vs lordotic: 35.0%; p = 0.049). Logistic regression revealed thoracic flexibility (p = 0.045) as the only independent correlate of PJK. CONCLUSIONS Half of patients with ASD experienced significant changes in TK during supine positioning, a quality that may influence surgical strategy. Increased thoracic flexibility is associated with PJK, possibly secondary to fusing the patient’s spine in a flattened position intraoperatively.

scholarly journals Global sagittal spinal alignment at cervical flexion in patients with dropped head syndrome

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 230949902094826 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takamitsu Konishi ◽  
Kenji Endo ◽  
Takato Aihara ◽  
Hidekazu Suzuki ◽  
Yuji Matsuoka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thoracic Spine ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Sacral Slope ◽  
Neutral Position ◽  
Spinal Alignment ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Dropped Head Syndrome ◽  
Sagittal Spinal Alignment ◽  
Significant Difference

Purpose: Dropped head syndrome (DHS) is characterized by the passively correctable chin-on-chest deformity. The characteristic feature is emphasized in the cervical flexion position. The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of cervical flexion on sagittal spinal alignment in patients with DHS. Methods: The study included 15 DHS subjects and 55 cervical spondylosis (CS) subjects as the control group. The following parameters were analyzed: cervical sagittal vertical axis (C-SVA), occipitoaxial angle (O–C2A), C2 slope (C2S), C2–C7 angle (C2–C7A), T1 slope (T1S), sagittal vertical axis, T1–T4 angle (T1–T4A), T5–T8 angle (T5–T8A), T9–T12 angle, lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, and pelvic tilt, in cervical flexion and neutral positions. Results: The values of C-SVA, O–C2A, C2S, and T1S were significantly different between CS and DHS at cervical neutral and flexion positions. C2–C7A showed significant difference in cervical neutral position, but the difference disappeared in flexion position. T1–T4A did not present a significant difference, but T5–T8A showed a difference in neutral and flexion positions. Conclusions: Malalignment of DHS extended not only to cervical spine but also to cranio-cervical junction and thoracic spine, except T1–T4. It is known that global sagittal spinal alignment is correlated with adjacent parameters, although in DHS the reciprocal change was lost from cranio-cervical junction to the middle part of thoracic spine at cervical flexion.

scholarly journals Normal Age-Adjusted Sagittal Spinal Alignment Is Achieved with Surgical Correction in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 770-779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subaraman Ramchandran ◽  
Norah Foster ◽  
Akhila Sure ◽  
Thomas J. Errico ◽  
Aaron J. Buckland
Keyword(s):  
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis ◽  
Idiopathic Scoliosis ◽  
Lumbar Lordosis ◽  
Thoracic Kyphosis ◽  
Pelvic Incidence ◽  
Sagittal Alignment ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Surgical Correction ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis

<sec><title>Study Design</title><p>Retrospective analysis.</p></sec><sec><title>Purpose</title><p>Our hypothesis is that the surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) maintains normal sagittal alignment as compared to age-matched normative adolescent population.</p></sec><sec><title>Overview of Literature</title><p>Sagittal spino-pelvic alignment in AIS has been reported, however, whether corrective spinal fusion surgery re-establishes normal alignment remains unverified.</p></sec><sec><title>Methods</title><p>Sagittal profiles and spino-pelvic parameters of thirty-eight postsurgical correction AIS patients ≤21 years old without prior fusion from a single institution database were compared to previously published normative age-matched data. Coronal and sagittal measurements including structural coronal Cobb angle, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, sagittal vertical axis, C2–C7 cervical lordosis, C2–C7 sagittal vertical axis, and T1 pelvic angles were measured on standing full-body stereoradiographs using validated software to compare preoperative and 6 months postoperative changes with previously published adolescent norms. A sub-group analysis of patients with type 1 Lenke curves was performed comparing preoperative to postoperative alignment and also comparing this with previously published normative values.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>The mean coronal curve of the 38 AIS patients (mean age, 16±2.2 years; 76.3% female) was corrected from 53.6° to 9.6° (80.9%, <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01). None of the thoracic and spino-pelvic sagittal parameters changed significantly after surgery in previously hypo- and normo-kyphotic patients. In hyper-kyphotic patients, thoracic kyphosis decreased (<italic>p</italic>=0.003) with a reciprocal decrease in lumbar lordosis (<italic>p</italic>=0.01), thus lowering pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch mismatch (<italic>p</italic>=0.009). Structural thoracic scoliosis patients had slightly more thoracic kyphosis than age-matched patients at baseline and surgical correction of the coronal plane of their scoliosis preserved normal sagittal alignment postoperatively. A sub-analysis of Lenke curve type 1 patients (n=24) demonstrated no statistically significant changes in the sagittal alignment postoperatively despite adequate coronal correction.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusions</title><p>Surgical correction of the coronal plane in AIS patients preserves sagittal and spino-pelvic alignment as compared to age-matched asymptomatic adolescents.</p></sec>

scholarly journals Revision Strategies for Harrington Rod Instrumentation: Radiographic Outcomes and Complications

2020 ◽  
pp. 219256822096075
Author(s):  
Philip K. Louie ◽  
Sravisht Iyer ◽  
Krishn Khanna ◽  
Garrett K. Harada ◽  
Alina Khalid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis ◽  
Idiopathic Scoliosis ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Lumbar Lordosis ◽  
Pelvic Incidence ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes ◽  
Harrington Rod

Study Design: Retrospective case series. Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes following revision surgery following Harrington rod instrumentation. Methods: Patients who underwent revision surgery with a minimum of 1-year follow-up for flatback syndrome following Harrington rod instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were identified from a multicenter dataset. Baseline demographics and intraoperative information were obtained. Preoperative, initial postoperative, and most recent spinopelvic parameters were compared. Postoperative complications and reoperations were subsequently evaluated. Results: A total of 41 patients met the inclusion criteria with an average follow-up of 27.7 months. Overall, 14 patients (34.1%) underwent a combined anterior-posterior fusion, and 27 (65.9%) underwent an osteotomy for correction. Preoperatively, the most common lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) was at L3 and L4 (61%), whereas 85% had a LIV to the pelvis after revision. The mean preoperative pelvic incidence–lumbar lordosis mismatch and C7 sagittal vertical axis were 23.7° and 89.6 mm. This was corrected to 8.1° and 28.9 mm and maintained to 9.04° and 34.4 mm at latest follow-up. Complications included deep wound infection (12.2%), durotomy (14.6%), implant related failures (14.6%), and temporary neurologic deficits (22.0%). Eight patients underwent further revision surgery at an average of 7.4 months after initial revision. Conclusions: There are multiple surgical techniques to address symptomatic flatback syndrome in patients with previous Harrington rod instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. At an average of 27.7 months follow-up, pelvic incidence–lumbar lordosis mismatch and C7 sagittal vertical axis can be successfully corrected and maintained. However, complication and reoperation rates remain high.

scholarly journals Beyond Pelvic Incidence–Lumbar Lordosis Mismatch: The Importance of Assessing the Entire Spine to Achieve Global Sagittal Alignment

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 536-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert K. Merrill ◽  
Jun S. Kim ◽  
Dante M. Leven ◽  
Joung Heon Kim ◽  
Samuel K. Cho
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Lordosis ◽  
Pelvic Incidence ◽  
Adult Spinal Deformity ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Global Sagittal Alignment ◽  
Sagittal Parameters ◽  
Combined Parameters

Study Design: Retrospective case series. Objective: To investigate which sagittal parameters contribute to a normal sagittal vertical axis (SVA) when there is a pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch >10° following adult spinal deformity (ASD) correction. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of ASD patients with >5 levels fused. Sagittal measurements between cohorts of postoperative PI-LL >10° and PI-LL<10° were compared. We correlated SVA to pelvic tilt (PT), thoracic kyphosis (TK), PI-LL, cervical lordosis (CL), and correlated the pre- to postoperative change in SVA to change in PT, change in TK, change in PI-LL, and change in CL. We also correlated SVA and the change in SVA to combined parameters of ((PI-LL) − PT + TK). Results: We analyzed 52 patients with a mean age of 59 ± 16 years. In patients with a postoperative SVA <5cm, a smaller TK was seen when PI-LL >10° than when PI-LL<10° (15.45° vs 33.04°, P = .0004). Additionally, PT was larger when PI-LL >10° than when PI-LL <10° (25.73° vs 19.07°, P = .006). SVA correlated better with ((PI-LL) − PT + TK) ( R2 = 0.51) than with PI-LL alone ( R2 = 0.33). Lastly, there was no significant correlation between change in pre- to postoperative SVA with change in TK for all cases ( P = .73), but in cases where change in PI-LL was <10°, there was a significant correlation between change in TK and change in SVA ( P = .009). Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that PT and TK, and not just PI-LL, play an important role in maintaining sagittal balance when there is a PI-LL mismatch >10°.

scholarly journals Cervical sagittal alignment in patients with dropped head syndrome

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 230949902199011
Author(s):  
Weiqing Qian ◽  
Kenji Endo ◽  
Takato Aihara ◽  
Yasunobu Sawaji ◽  
Hidekazu Suzuki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spondylosis ◽  
Sagittal Alignment ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Spinal Alignment ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Dropped Head Syndrome ◽  
Sagittal Spinal Alignment ◽  
Cervical Sagittal Alignment ◽  
Lumbar Alignment ◽  
The Relationship

Background: Dropped head syndrome (DHS) can be divided into two types, the positive sagittal vertical axis (SVA) type and the negative SVA type. However, the cervical sagittal alignment of DHS including global sagittal spinal alignment and the typical cervical alignment of the types of DHS is still unclear. The purpose of this study was to clarify the character of cervical sagittal alignment of DHS and analyze the relationship between cervical sagittal alignment and global sagittal spinal alignment. Methods: The subjects were 35 DHS patients (10 men, 25 women, mean 71.1 years old). They were divided into two groups: negative DHS (N-DHS group, SVA < 0 mm) and positive DHS group (P-DHS group, SVA ≥ 0 mm). As control, 28 age-matched cervical spondylosis patients (CS, 21 men, 7 women, mean 67.4 years old) were analyzed. The following parameters were measured on lateral global-spine standing radiographs: cervical SVA (C2-C7SVA), O-C2A (O-C2 angle), C2 slope (C2S), C2-7A (C2-7 angle), T1 slope (T1S) and C7SVA. Results: The results of measurements of each of the averaged sagittal alignment parameters were (CS, P-DHS, N-DHS): C2-7SVA(26.2 mm, 47.3 mm, 44.5 mm), O-C2 angle (35.0°, 37.1°, 39.3°), C2S (16.5°, 31.4°, 33.8°), C2-7A (9.3°, 9.9°, −16.6°), T1S (22.9°, 39.7°, 25.7°), C7SVA (35.3 mm, 51.0 mm, −43.1 mm). C2-C7SVA and C2S were significantly larger in both types of DHS compared to CS. Comparing P-DHS with N-DHS, C2-C7A and T1S were significantly smaller in N-DHS. Conclusions: O-C2A did not differ significantly among CS, P-DHS and N-DHS. In DHS patients, C2-7SVA and C2S were significantly larger than those of CS regardless of the type of DHS. The typical cervical sagittal alignment of DHS was different between P-DHS and N-DHS. In P-DHS, C2-7A and T1S were larger than those in N-DHS and the imbalance of thoraco-lumbar alignment should be noted.

scholarly journals Small sagittal vertical axis accompanied with lumbar hyperlordosis as a risk factor for developing postoperative cervical kyphosis after expansive open-door laminoplasty

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 176-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuji Matsuoka ◽  
Hidekazu Suzuki ◽  
Kenji Endo ◽  
Yasunobu Sawaji ◽  
Kazuma Murata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Sagittal Imbalance ◽  
Open Door ◽  
Spinal Alignment ◽  
Cervical Kyphosis ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Sagittal Spinal Alignment ◽  
Lumbar Hyperlordosis ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Whole Spine

OBJECTIVEPreoperative positive cervical sagittal imbalance and global sagittal imbalance are risk factors for postoperative cervical kyphosis after expansive open-door cervical laminoplasty (ELAP). The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the incidence of postoperative cervical kyphosis after ELAP and the preoperative global sagittal spinal alignment in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) without spinal sagittal imbalance.METHODSAmong 84 consecutive patients who underwent ELAP for CSM at the authors’ hospital, 43 patients without preoperative cervical kyphosis (C2–7 angle ≥ 0°) and spinal sagittal imbalance (C2–7 sagittal vertical axis [SVA] ≤ 80 mm and C-7 SVA ≤ 95 mm) were included in the study. The global spinal sagittal parameters were measured on lateral whole-spine standing radiographs preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively. The difference in preoperative global sagittal spinal alignment between the postoperative cervical lordosis group and the cervical kyphosis group was analyzed.RESULTSThe incidence of postoperative cervical kyphosis after ELAP was 25.6% (11 of 43 cases). Thirty-two patients (16 men and 16 women; mean age 67.7 ± 12.0 years) had lordosis, and 11 (7 men and 4 women; mean age 67.2 ± 9.6 years) had kyphosis. The preoperative C-7 SVA and pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI−LL) in the kyphosis group were significantly smaller than those in the lordosis group (p < 0.05). The smaller C-7 SVA accompanied by a small PI−LL, the “truncal negative offset,” led to postoperative cervical kyphosis due to posterior structural weakening by ELAP.CONCLUSIONSIn patients with CSM without preoperative cervical and global spinal sagittal imbalance, a small SVA accompanied by lumbar hyperlordosis is the characteristic alignment leading to postoperative cervical kyphosis after ELAP.

scholarly journals Comparing Radiographic Parameters for Single-Level L5-S1 Interbody Fusion: Anterior Lumbar (ALIF) Versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF)

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Caleb S Edwards ◽  
Andrew Kai-Hong Chan ◽  
Dean Chou ◽  
Praveen V Mummaneni
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Lordosis ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Pelvic Incidence ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Central Canal ◽  
Disc Height ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Single Level ◽  
Segmental Lordosis

Abstract INTRODUCTION The lumbosacral junction acts as a transition point between the mobile lumbar spine and the rigid pelvis. It is thereby susceptible to degenerative changes necessitating fusion at L5-S1. In this study, we compared radiographic outcomes observed from single-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) at this level. METHODS Retrospective review of single-level ALIF and TLIF with up to one level PSF at L5-S1 between May 2007 and October 2018 was undertaken. X-ray measurements were gathered for lumbar lordosis, segmental lordosis, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, pelvic incidence, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch, anterior/posterior disc height, and sagittal vertical axis. Computed tomography /magnetic resonance imaging was used to determine central canal area, sagittal diameter, foraminal height, and foraminal area. RESULTS A total of 47 ALIF patients and 50 TLIF patients were included. Patients averaged 53.7 ± 10.1 yr of age for ALIF and 49.4 ± 14.7 yr old for TLIF (P = .094) with significant differences (P = .0017) seen with gender as ALIF had 60.4% males and TLIF 70.0% females. Single-level ALIF led to significantly (P = .0010) more segmental lordosis (+5.75° ± 7.31°) than TLIF (+0.25° ± 6.55°), though differences in lumbar lordosis were not statistically significant (P = .52). ALIF significantly increased both anterior (+10.4 ± 4.32 mm vs +4.30 ± 3.55 mm; P < .0001) and posterior disc height (+4.33 ± 3.32 mm vs + 2.98 ± 2.07 mm; P = .043) than TLIF. Changes in sagittal vertical axis also significantly differed (P = .030) with ALIF decreasing sagittal vertical axis by 17.8 ± 26.4 mm from +60.3 mm to + 42.5 mm, and TLIF increasing by 0.95 ± 25.8 mm from 39.9 mm to 40.9 mm. Pelvic tilt, sacral slope, pelvic incidence, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch had no significant differences. No statistically significant differences were observed with central canal area, sagittal diameter, foraminal height or foraminal area between ALIF and TLIF. CONCLUSION At L5-S1, the ALIF approach leads to increased segmental lordosis, disc height, while also decreasing sagittal vertical axis to a significant degree than TLIF. However, these two approaches were no different with regards to pelvic parameters and measures of central canal and foraminal decompression.

Impact of spinopelvic alignment on decision making in deformity surgery in adults

2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 547-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher P. Ames ◽  
Justin S. Smith ◽  
Justin K. Scheer ◽  
Shay Bess ◽  
S. Samuel Bederman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Planning ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Spinal Alignment ◽  
Spinopelvic Parameters ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Radiographic Findings ◽  
Spinopelvic Alignment ◽  
Sagittal Spinal Alignment ◽  
Cause Of Pain ◽  
Proper Analysis

Sagittal spinal misalignment (SSM) is an established cause of pain and disability. Treating physicians must be familiar with the radiographic findings consistent with SSM. Additionally, the restoration or maintenance of physiological sagittal spinal alignment after reconstructive spinal procedures is imperative to achieve good clinical outcomes. The C-7 plumb line (sagittal vertical axis) has traditionally been used to evaluate sagittal spinal alignment; however, recent data indicate that the measurement of spinopelvic parameters provides a more comprehensive assessment of sagittal spinal alignment. In this review the authors describe the proper analysis of spinopelvic alignment for surgical planning. Online videos supplement the text to better illustrate the key concepts.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document