scholarly journals Cadmium Exposure and Risk of Breast Cancer by Histological and Tumor Receptor Subtype in White Caucasian Women: A Hospital-Based Case-Control Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 3029 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loreta Strumylaite ◽  
Rima Kregzdyte ◽  
Algirdas Bogusevicius ◽  
Lina Poskiene ◽  
Dale Baranauskiene ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Experimental Studies ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Absorption Spectrometry ◽  
Receptor Subtype ◽  
Urinary Cadmium ◽  
Tumor Histology ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Her2 Breast Cancer

As the majority of experimental studies suggest cadmium being metalloestrogen, we examined cadmium/breast cancer (BC) association by histological and tumor receptor subtype in 509 invasive BC patients and 1170 controls. Urinary cadmium was determined by atomic absorption spectrometry, and categorized using tertiles of its distribution in the controls: <0.18, 0.18–0.33, >0.33 kg × 10−9/kg × 10−3 creatinine. Relative to the lowest category of urinary cadmium adjusted odds ratio (OR) of ductal BC was 1.18 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89–1.58) in the intermediate and 1.53 (95% CI: 1.15–2.04) in the highest category. There was a significant association for hormone receptor-positive ductal BC: ORs per category increase were 1.34 (95% CI: 1.14–1.59) for estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), 1.33 (95% CI: 1.09–1.61) for progesterone receptor-positive (PR+) and 1.35 (95% CI: 1.11–1.65) for ER+/PR+ BC. We found a significant association between cadmium and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) ductal BC. The strongest association with cadmium was for ER+/PR+/HER2− ductal BC. The associations between cadmium and lobular BC with hormone receptor-positive and HER2− were positive but insignificant. There was no evidence that the associations with cadmium differed for cancers with different tumor histology (p-heterogeneity > 0.05). This study provides evidence that urinary cadmium is associated with the risk of hormone receptor-positive and HER2− breast cancer independent of tumor histology.

scholarly journals Outcomes of Breast Cancer Receptor Testing at the Georgetown Public Hospital Corporation from December 2016 to December 2018

2019 ◽  
pp. 15-16
Author(s):  
Sandy Solomon ◽  
Ravi Motilall
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Public Hospital ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Her2 Breast Cancer ◽  
The Caribbean ◽  
Design And Methods

Objectives: To review the outcomes of oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in breast cancer patients at GPHC over a 2 year period from December 2016-December 2018. Hypothesis: There is a higher incidence triple negative(ER (-), PR (-), HER2 (-)) breast cancer among patients in Guyana when compared to the Caribbean. Secondary Objectives: To identify the patients who had hormone receptor testing done at the Georgetown Public Hospital Corporation (GPHC). To specify the current trends of ER, PR and HER2 in patients at GPHC from December 2016- December 2018. To enumerate the percentage of BC diagnosed in the patients under 40 years. Design and Methods: Retrospective cohort study of 90 BC patients with known receptor status from December 2016-Dcember 2018. Results: In this study of 90 patients 46% of the patients are triple negative BC, while 38% are hormone receptor positive. Of least frequency are the triple positive BC representing 3%. The persons 40years and under represent 16% of the population. Conclusion: There in a high percentage of breast cancer in patients under 40 years representing 16% of the study population. There is a higher percentage of triple negative or non-hormonal receptive breast cancer at GPHC of approximately 46% which supersedes 20% when compared to the Caribbean population. Recommendations: Further study is needed, with screening and development of protocols. Breast receptor testing in all patients need to routinely done and a formal cancer registry and Digital database established.

scholarly journals Japanese subpopulation analysis of MONARCH 2: phase 3 study of abemaciclib plus fulvestrant for treatment of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer that progressed on endocrine therapy

Breast Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenichi Inoue ◽  
Norikazu Masuda ◽  
Hiroji Iwata ◽  
Masato Takahashi ◽  
Yoshinori Ito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Epidermal Growth Factor ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Epidermal Growth

Abstract Background This was a Japanese subpopulation analysis of MONARCH 2, a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study of abemaciclib plus fulvestrant in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC). Methods Eligible women had progressed on (neo)adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET), ≤ 12 months from end of adjuvant ET, or on first-line ET for ABC, and had not received chemotherapy for ABC. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive abemaciclib or placebo plus fulvestrant. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), pharmacokinetics (PK), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and safety. Results In Japan, 95 patients were randomized (abemaciclib, n = 64; placebo, n = 31). At final PFS analysis (February 14, 2017), median PFS was 21.2 and 14.3 months, respectively, in the abemaciclib and placebo groups (hazard ratio: 0.672; 95% confidence interval: 0.380–1.189). Abemaciclib had a higher objective response rate (37.5%) than placebo (12.9%). PK and safety profiles for Japanese patients were consistent with those of the overall population, without clinically meaningful differences across most HRQoL dimensions evaluated. The most frequent adverse events in the abemaciclib versus placebo groups were diarrhea (95.2 versus 25.8%), neutropenia (79.4 versus 0%), and leukopenia (66.7 versus 0%). At a second data cutoff (June 20, 2019), median OS was not reached with abemaciclib and 47.3 months with placebo (hazard ratio: 0.755; 95% confidence interval: 0.390–1.463). Conclusions Results of the Japanese subpopulation were consistent with the improved clinical outcomes and manageable safety profile observed in the overall population. Clinical trial registration NCT02107703; U.S. National Library of Medicine: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02107703.

scholarly journals Top 3 abstracts concerning hormone-receptor-positive early breast cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Peter Gampenrieder ◽  
Gabriel Rinnerthaler ◽  
Richard Greil
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Early Breast Cancer ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Menopausal Status ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Oncotype Dx ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Her2 Breast Cancer

SummaryThe three top abstracts at the 2020 virtual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium regarding hormone-receptor-positive early breast cancer, from our point of view, were the long-awaited results from PenelopeB and RxPONDER as well as the data from the ADAPT trial of the West German Study Group. PenelopeB failed to show any benefit by adjuvant palbociclib when added to standard endocrine therapy in patients without pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. RxPONDER demonstrated that postmenopausal patients with early hormone receptor positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2−) breast cancer, 1–3 positive lymph nodes and an Oncotype DX Recurrence Score of less than 26 can safely be treated with endocrine therapy alone. In contrast, in premenopausal women with positive nodes, adjuvant chemotherapy plays still a role even in case of low genomic risk. Whether the benefit by chemotherapy is mainly an indirect endocrine effect and if ovarian function suppression would be similarly effective, is still a matter of debate. The HR+/HER2− part of the ADAPT umbrella trial investigated the role of a Ki-67 response to a short endocrine therapy before surgery in addition to Oncotype DX—performed on the pretreatment biopsy—to identify low-risk patients who can safely forgo adjuvant chemotherapy irrespective of menopausal status.

scholarly journals Immune microenvironment and intrinsic subtyping in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaia Griguolo ◽  
Maria Vittoria Dieci ◽  
Laia Paré ◽  
Federica Miglietta ◽  
Daniele Giulio Generali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Expression Data ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Tumor Biology ◽  
Expression Data ◽  
Immune Microenvironment ◽  
Immune Infiltrate ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Her2 Breast Cancer

AbstractLittle is known regarding the interaction between immune microenvironment and tumor biology in hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2− breast cancer (BC). We here assess pretreatment gene-expression data from 66 HR+/HER2− early BCs from the LETLOB trial and show that non-luminal tumors (HER2-enriched, Basal-like) present higher tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte levels than luminal tumors. Moreover, significant differences in immune infiltrate composition, assessed by CIBERSORT, were observed: non-luminal tumors showed a more proinflammatory antitumor immune infiltrate composition than luminal ones.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document