scholarly journals Diagnostic Performance of Serial High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin Measurements in the Emergency Setting

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 97
Author(s):  
Peter A. Kavsak ◽  
Mark K. Hewitt ◽  
Shawn E. Mondoux ◽  
Joshua O. Cerasuolo ◽  
Jinhui Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Troponin ◽  
Troponin I ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Emergency Setting ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Concentration Changes ◽  
European Society Of Cardiology ◽  
Serial Measurements ◽  
Cardiac Care Unit ◽  
Rule Out

Serial high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hsTn) testing in the emergency department (ED) and the intensive cardiac care unit may assist physicians in ruling out or ruling in acute myocardial infarction (MI). There are three major algorithms proposed for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hsTnI) using serial measurements while incorporating absolute concentration changes for MI or death following ED presentation. We sought to determine the diagnostic estimates of these three algorithms and if one was superior in two different Canadian ED patient cohorts with serial hsTnI measurements. An undifferentiated ED population (Cohort-1) and an ED population with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS; Cohort-2) were clinically managed with non-hsTn testing with the hsTnI testing performed in real-time with physicians blinded to these results (i.e., hsTnI not reported). The three algorithms evaluated were the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), the High-STEACS pathway, and the COMPASS-MI algorithm. The diagnostic estimates were derived for each algorithm for the 30-day MI/death outcome for the rule-out and rule-in arm in each cohort and compared to proposed diagnostic benchmarks (i.e., sensitivity ≥ 99.0% and specificity ≥ 90.0%) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). In Cohort-1 (n = 2966 patients, 15.3% had outcome) and Cohort-2 (n = 935 patients, 15.6% had outcome), the algorithm that obtained the highest sensitivity (97.8%; 95% CI: 96.0–98.9 and 98.6%; 95% CI: 95.1–99.8, respectively) in both cohorts was COMPASS-MI. Only Cohort-2 with both the ESC and COMPASS-MI algorithms exceeded the specificity benchmark (97.0%; 95% CI: 95.5–98.0 and 96.7%; 95% CI: 95.2–97.8, respectively). Patient selection for serial hsTnI testing will affect specificity estimates, with no algorithm achieving a sensitivity ≥ 99% for 30-day MI or death.

3298Prehospital assessment of the one-hour rule-in/rule-out algorithm using a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin t assay in a low-prevalence population for acute coronary syndrome (OUT-ACS)

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T R Johannessen ◽  
D Atar ◽  
S Halvorsen ◽  
A C Larstorp ◽  
I Mdala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Chest Pain ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Cardiac Troponin ◽  
Troponin T ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Cardiac Troponin T ◽  
Emergency Setting ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Rule Out

Abstract Background The majority of patients with chest pain in Norway initially present to the primary health care system, which serves to triage them to the specialist health care services including hospitals. In some emergency primary care institutions, patients who are not hospitalised directly undergo further diagnostic testing to rule out acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Purpose Several studies have shown the advantage of using high-sensitivity assays for fast interpretation of cardiac troponins. The majority of these studies included patient populations from hospital emergency departments. In contrast, we aimed to investigate whether the 1-hour algorithm for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) is safe and useful for implementation in a primary care emergency setting where the patients have a much lower pre-test probability for an acute coronary syndrome. Methods In this prospective cohort study, we included 1672 patients with acute non-specific chest pain from November 2016 to October 2018 at a primary care emergency outpatient clinic in Norway. Serial hs-cTnT samples were analysed after 0, 1 and 4 hours on the Cobas 8000 e602 analyzer. We divided the results into one of three groups (rule-out, rule-in, or further observation), according to the 0/1-hour algorithm for hs-cTn from the current ESC guidelines on non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. In the rule-out group, the 0/1-hour results were compared to the standard 4-hour hs-cTnT. Final hospital diagnoses were collected as a gold standard for the patients in the rule-in group. Results A total of 44 (2.6%) of 1672 patients were diagnosed with AMI. By applying the algorithm, 1274 (76.2%) patients were assigned to the rule-out group. One of the rule-out patients had a significant increase in hs-cTnT in the 4-hour sample. This results in a sensitivity for AMI of 97.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.0–99.9) and negative predictive value of 99.9% (95% CI 99.6–100.0). There were 50 (3.0%) patients in the rule-in group, amongst whom 35 had a verified AMI. This gives a specificity for AMI of 99.1% (95% CI 98.5–99.5) and a positive predictive value at 70.0% (95% CI 55.4–82.1). Among the 348 (20.8%) patients assigned to further observation, eight patients had an AMI. The 15 rule-in patients who did not have an AMI, had other acute illnesses that required further diagnostic work-up at the hospital. Conclusions With a negative predictive value at 99.9%, the 1-hour algorithm for hs-cTnT seems safe and applicable for a faster assessment of patients with non-specific chest pain in a primary care emergency setting. Prehospital implementation of this algorithm may reduce the need for hospitalisation of these patients and hence may probably lower the costs. ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT02983123 Acknowledgement/Funding Norwegian Research Fund for General Practice, The Norwegian Physicians' Association Fund for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety

scholarly journals Economic Considerations of Early Rule-In/Rule-Out Algorithms for The Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction in The Emergency Department Using Cardiac Troponin and Glycemic Biomarkers

2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 593-602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colleen Shortt ◽  
Feng Xie ◽  
Richard Whitlock ◽  
Jinhui Ma ◽  
Natasha Clayton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cardiac Troponin ◽  
Troponin I ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Hb A1c ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Rule Out

Abstract BACKGROUND We have previously demonstrated the utility of a rule-in/rule-out strategy for myocardial infarction (MI) using glycemic biomarkers in combination with cardiac troponin in the emergency department (ED). Given that the cost of assessing patients with possible MI in the ED is increasing, we sought to compare the health services cost of our previously identified early rule-in/rule-out approaches for MI among patients who present to the ED with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS We compared the cost differences between different rule-in/rule-out strategies for MI using presentation cardiac troponin I (cTnI), high-sensitivity cTnI (hs-cTnI), high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT), glucose, and/or hemoglobin A1c (Hb A1c) in 1137 ED patients (7-day MI n = 133) as per our previously defined algorithms and compared them with the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 0-h algorithm-cutoffs. Costs associated with each decision model were obtained from site-specific sources (length of stay) and provincial sources (Ontario Case Costing Initiative). RESULTS Algorithms incorporating cardiac troponin and glucose for early rule-in/rule-out were the most cost effective and clinically safest methods (i.e., ≤1 MI missed) for early decision making, with hs-cTnI and glucose yielding lower costs compared to cTnI and glucose, despite the higher price for the hs-cTnI test. The addition of Hb A1c to the algorithms increased the cost of these algorithms but did not miss any additional patients with MI. Applying the ESC 0-h algorithm-cutoffs for hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT were the most costly. CONCLUSIONS Rule-in/rule-out algorithms incorporating presentation glucose with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin are the safest and most cost-effective options as compared to the ESC 0-h algorithm-cutoffs.

scholarly journals Role of High-sensitivity Cardiac Troponin in Acute Coronary Syndrome

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahesh Anantha Narayanan ◽  
Santiago Garcia
Keyword(s):  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Chest Pain ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Cardiac Troponin ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Emergency Setting ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
The Us ◽  
Rule Out

Chest pain is one of the most common reasons for an emergency room (ER) visit in the US, with almost 6 million ER visits annually. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hscTn) assays have the ability to rapidly rule in or rule out acute coronary syndrome with improved sensitivity, and they are increasingly being used. Though hscTn assays have been approved for use in European, Australian, and Canadian guidelines since 2010, the FDA only approved their use in 2017. There is no consensus on how to compare the results from various hscTn assays. A literature review was performed to analyze the advantages and limitations of using hscTn as a standard biomarker to evaluate patients with suspected ACS in the emergency setting.

scholarly journals Novel high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome

Heart ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. heartjnl-2018-314093 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew R Chapman ◽  
Takeshi Fujisawa ◽  
Kuan Ken Lee ◽  
Jack Patrick Andrews ◽  
Atul Anand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Cardiac Troponin ◽  
Cardiac Death ◽  
Troponin I ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Cardiac Troponin I ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Rule Out

BackgroundHigh-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays enable the early risk stratification of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome to identify those at low risk of myocardial infarction or cardiac death. We evaluated the performance of a novel high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay in early rule out pathways.MethodsIn 1920 patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome, cardiac troponin was measured using the Siemens Atellica high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay (99th centile: 34 ng/L women, 53 ng/L men). We evaluated three pathways which use either low risk-stratification thresholds of cardiac troponin (High-SensitivityTroponin in the Evaluation of patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (High-STEACS) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 1 hour pathway) or the 99th centile diagnostic threshold (ESC 3 hour pathway) to rule out myocardial infarction.ResultsThe primary outcome of myocardial infarction or cardiac death at 30 days occurred in 14.4% (277/1920). The High-STEACS pathway ruled out 63% of patients (1218/1920), with five missed events for a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.5% (95% CI (CI) 99.1% to 99.8%). Similar performance was observed for the ESC 1 hour pathway with an NPV of 99.0% (97.6% to 99.8%). In contrast, the ESC 3 hour pathway ruled out 65% of patients (1248/1920), but missed 25 events for an NPV of 98.0% (97.1% to 98.7%).ConclusionsA novel high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay can safely identify patients at low risk of myocardial infarction or cardiac death. Diagnostic pathways that use low cardiac troponin concentrations for risk stratification miss fewer events than those that rely on the 99th centile to rule out myocardial infarction.Trial registrationNCT1852123.

scholarly journals Evaluating Rapid Rule-out of Acute Myocardial Infarction Using a High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I Assay at Presentation

2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 820-829 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaimi Greenslade ◽  
Elizabeth Cho ◽  
Christopher Van Hise ◽  
Tracey Hawkins ◽  
William Parsonage ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cardiac Troponin ◽  
Troponin I ◽  
Limit Of Detection ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Cardiac Troponin I ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Rule Out

Abstract BACKGROUND Low concentrations of cardiac troponin (cTn) have been recommended for rapid rule-out of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We examined the Beckman Coulter Access high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assay to identify a single test threshold that can safely rule out AMI. METHODS This analysis used stored samples collected in 2 prospective observational studies. In all, 1871 patients presenting to a tertiary emergency department with symptoms of acute coronary syndrome had blood taken for measurement of cTnI on presentation. The endpoint was type 1 myocardial infarction (T1MI). Sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for hs-cTnI values below the 99th percentile. RESULTS Ninety-eight patients had T1MI (5.2%), and 638 (34.1%) patients had an hs-cTnI <2 ng/L (limit of detection), with sensitivity of 99.0% (95% CI, 94.4%–100%) and NPV of 99.8% (95% CI, 99.1%–100%). No hs-cTnI value above a concentration of 2 ng/L achieved sensitivity of 99%. However, an NPV of 99.5% was achieved at values <6 ng/L. A cutoff <6 ng/L enabled 1475 (78.8%) patients to be ruled out on presentation with sensitivity of 93.9% (95% CI, 87.1%–97.7%). CONCLUSIONS A single baseline cTn <2 ng/L measured with the Access hs-cTnI assay performed well for rule-out of AMI. This cutoff concentration identified 99% of patients with AMI and could reduce the number of patients requiring lengthy assessment. A cutoff of <6 ng/L yielded a high NPV but missed more cases of AMI than would be acceptable to clinicians.

Performance of the European Society of Cardiology 0/1-hour algorithm in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin: Systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 204887262093539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucrecia M Burgos ◽  
Marcelo Trivi ◽  
Juan P Costabel
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Likelihood Ratio ◽  
European Society ◽  
Cardiac Troponin ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
European Society Of Cardiology ◽  
Rule Out

Introduction: A rapid rule-out or rule-in protocol based on the 0-hour/1-hour algorithm using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) is recommended by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC); recently multiple studies have validated it in their settings. We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the 2015 ESC guidelines for management of acute coronary syndrome in patients without ST-segment elevation 0-hour/1-hour algorithm using hs-cTn for the early rule-out and rule-in of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) on presentation. Methods: Systematic searches were conducted using PubMed, the Cochrane Library and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform to identify prospective studies from 2015 to October 2019 involving adults presenting to the emergency department with possible acute coronary syndrome in which hs-cTn measurements were obtained according to the ESC algorithm and AMI outcomes were adjudicated during the initial hospitalization. Results: Eleven studies, involving 19,213 patients, were identified. Pooled prevalence of AMI during the index hospitalization was 11.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.9–18.8%). Summary sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing AMI were 99% (95% CI 98–99%; I2 63%) and 91% (95% CI 91–92%; I2 96%) respectively. The summary positive likelihood ratio was 11.6 (95% CI 8.5–15.8; I2 97%) and the pooled likelihood ratio negative 0.02 (0.01–0.03; I2 52%). Cumulative all-cause mortality at 30 days in the rule-out group was 0.11%, and 2.8% in the rule-in group, and 30 days AMI in the rule-out group was 0.08%. Conclusion: The ESC 0-hour/1-hour algorithm using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin has high diagnostic accuracy; it allows safe rule-out as well as accurate rule-in of AMI, with low cumulative 30-day mortality and AMI in patients assigned the rule-out zone.

A single high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T compared to the HEART score for a rapid rule-out of acute myocardial infarction at a prehospital emergency clinic

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
T.R Johannessen ◽  
D Atar ◽  
O.M Vallersnes ◽  
A.C.K Larstorp ◽  
I Mdala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cardiac Troponin ◽  
Troponin T ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Symptom Duration ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Emergency Setting ◽  
Heart Score ◽  
Rule Out

Abstract Background Patients presenting with acute chest pain outside of hospitals represent a diagnostic challenge. Purpose We aimed to validate whether a single high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) safely can rule out acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in a primary care emergency setting. In addition, we aimed to investigate if the hs-HEART (History, Electrocardiogram (ECG), Age, Risk factors, and hs-Troponin) score would add valuable diagnostic information. Methods This is a secondary analysis from a prospective diagnostic study, including 1711 patients with acute non-specific chest pain presenting to a primary care emergency clinic from November 2016 to October 2018. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 0/1-hour algorithm triages patients towards direct rule-out if the 0-hour hs-cTnT is below 5 ng/L, combined with a normal ECG and a 3-hour symptom duration. The hs-HEART score (0–10 points) was calculated retrospectively, and a score ≤3 points was considered low-risk. In addition, a modified hs-HEART score, with more comparable hs-cTnT cut-off values, was applied. The primary endpoint was AMI during the index episode; the secondary the 90-day incidence of AMI (including index) and all-cause death. Results Among 1711 patients, 61 (3.6%) had an AMI, and 525 (30.7%) were assigned towards direct rule-out. With no AMIs in this group, the rule-out safety was high (negative predictive value (NPV) and sensitivity 100%). The hs-HEART score triaged more patients (n=966) as low-risk, but missed six AMIs (NPV 99.4% and sensitivity 90.2%). The modified hs-HEART score (n=707, AMI=3) increased the low-risk sensitivity to 95.1%. The 90-day incidence of AMI and all-cause death in the direct rule-out, low-risk hs-HEART, and modified hs-HEART group, were 0.0%, 0.7%, and 0.4%, respectively. Conclusions The ESC direct rule-out approach, with a single hs-cTnT below 5 ng/L, combined with a normal ECG, and a 3-hour symptom duration, is superior to the two hs-HEART scores in ruling out AMI in a primary care emergency setting. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): The Norwegian Research Fund for General Practice

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document