scholarly journals Q-Curve and Area Rules for Choosing Heuristic Parameter in Tikhonov Regularization

Mathematics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 1166
Author(s):  
Toomas Raus ◽  
Uno Hämarik

We consider choice of the regularization parameter in Tikhonov method if the noise level of the data is unknown. One of the best rules for the heuristic parameter choice is the quasi-optimality criterion where the parameter is chosen as the global minimizer of the quasi-optimality function. In some problems this rule fails. We prove that one of the local minimizers of the quasi-optimality function is always a good regularization parameter. For the choice of the proper local minimizer we propose to construct the Q-curve which is the analogue of the L-curve, but on the x-axis we use modified discrepancy instead of discrepancy and on the y-axis the quasi-optimality function instead of the norm of the approximate solution. In the area rule we choose for the regularization parameter such local minimizer of the quasi-optimality function for which the area of the polygon, connecting on Q-curve this minimum point with certain maximum points, is maximal. We also provide a posteriori error estimates of the approximate solution, which allows to check the reliability of the parameter chosen heuristically. Numerical experiments on an extensive set of test problems confirm that the proposed rules give much better results than previous heuristic rules. Results of proposed rules are comparable with results of the discrepancy principle and the monotone error rule, if the last two rules use the exact noise level.

Author(s):  
J. R. Beisheim ◽  
G. B. Sinclair ◽  
P. J. Roache

Current computational capabilities facilitate the application of finite element analysis (FEA) to three-dimensional geometries to determine peak stresses. The three-dimensional stress concentrations so quantified are useful in practice provided the discretization error attending their determination with finite elements has been sufficiently controlled. Here, we provide some convergence checks and companion a posteriori error estimates that can be used to verify such three-dimensional FEA, and thus enable engineers to control discretization errors. These checks are designed to promote conservative error estimation. They are applied to twelve three-dimensional test problems that have exact solutions for their peak stresses. Error levels in the FEA of these peak stresses are classified in accordance with: 1–5%, satisfactory; 1/5–1%, good; and <1/5%, excellent. The present convergence checks result in 111 error assessments for the test problems. For these 111, errors are assessed as being at the same level as true exact errors on 99 occasions, one level worse for the other 12. Hence, stress error estimation that is largely reasonably accurate (89%), and otherwise modestly conservative (11%).


2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 609-631 ◽  
Author(s):  
Immanuel Anjam ◽  
Dirk Pauly

AbstractThe results of this contribution are derived in the framework of functional type a posteriori error estimates. The error is measured in a combined norm which takes into account both the primal and dual variables denoted by x and y, respectively. Our first main result is an error equality for all equations of the class ${\mathrm{A}^{*}\mathrm{A}x+x=f}$ or in mixed formulation ${\mathrm{A}^{*}y+x=f}$, ${\mathrm{A}x=y}$, where the exact solution $(x,y)$ is in $D(\mathrm{A})\times D(\mathrm{A}^{*})$. Here ${\mathrm{A}}$ is a linear, densely defined and closed (usually a differential) operator and ${\mathrm{A}^{*}}$ its adjoint. In this paper we deal with very conforming mixed approximations, i.e., we assume that the approximation ${(\tilde{x},\tilde{y})}$ belongs to ${D(\mathrm{A})\times D(\mathrm{A}^{*})}$. In order to obtain the exact global error value of this approximation one only needs the problem data and the mixed approximation itself, i.e., we have the equality$\lvert x-\tilde{x}\rvert^{2}+\lvert\mathrm{A}(x-\tilde{x})\rvert^{2}+\lvert y-% \tilde{y}\rvert^{2}+\lvert\mathrm{A}^{*}(y-\tilde{y})\rvert^{2}=\mathcal{M}(% \tilde{x},\tilde{y}),$where ${\mathcal{M}(\tilde{x},\tilde{y}):=\lvert f-\tilde{x}-\mathrm{A}^{*}\tilde{y}% \rvert^{2}+\lvert\tilde{y}-\mathrm{A}\tilde{x}\rvert^{2}}$ contains only known data. Our second main result is an error estimate for all equations of the class ${\mathrm{A}^{*}\mathrm{A}x+ix=f}$ or in mixed formulation ${\mathrm{A}^{*}y+ix=f}$, ${\mathrm{A}x=y}$, where i is the imaginary unit. For this problem we have the two-sided estimate$\frac{\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{2}+1}\mathcal{M}_{i}(\tilde{x},\tilde{y})\leq\lvert x-% \tilde{x}\rvert^{2}+\lvert\mathrm{A}(x-\tilde{x})\rvert^{2}+\lvert y-\tilde{y}% \rvert^{2}+\lvert\mathrm{A}^{*}(y-\tilde{y})\rvert^{2}\leq\frac{\sqrt{2}}{% \sqrt{2}-1}\mathcal{M}_{i}(\tilde{x},\tilde{y}),$where ${\mathcal{M}_{i}(\tilde{x},\tilde{y}):=\lvert f-i\tilde{x}-\mathrm{A}^{*}% \tilde{y}\rvert^{2}+\lvert\tilde{y}-\mathrm{A}\tilde{x}\rvert^{2}}$ contains only known data. We will point out a motivation for the study of the latter problems by time discretizations or time-harmonic ansatz of linear partial differential equations and we will present an extensive list of applications including the reaction-diffusion problem and the eddy current problem.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document