scholarly journals Towards the Biobeneficiation of PGMs: Reviewing the Opportunities

Minerals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
Liberty Chipise ◽  
Sehliselo Ndlovu ◽  
Alan Shemi

Conventional beneficiation of the Platinum Group of Metals (PGMs) relies on the use of inorganic chemicals. With the depreciation of high grade deposits, these conventional processes are becoming less economically viable. Furthermore, the use of chemicals has serious negative impacts on the environment. To address the challenges of conventional PGM beneficiation, biobeneficiation has been proposed. In conventional flotation, the flotation behavior of the associated sulphides determines overall PGM recovery. The same principle may also be applied for the bio-beneficiation of PGMs. Therefore, this paper discusses the biobeneficiation behavior of sulphides closely associated with PGMs with the aim of postulating the bio-beneficiation behavior of PGMs associated with the same base metal sulphides. Conventional PGM processes are briefly discussed, as bio-beneficiation of PGMs is governed by similar underlying principles. Potential microorganisms for the biobeneficiation of PGMs are highlighted, as well as the corresponding conditions for their effectiveness. The use of both single cultures and mixed cultures is discussed. Depending on conditions, PGMs associated with pyrite and/or chalcopyrite were projected to be biofloatable with B. polymyxa, P. polymyxa, A. ferrooxidans, L. ferrooxidans, B. pumilus, B. subtilis, halophilic bacteria, Alicyclobacillus ferrooxidans, sulphate reducing bacteria, and mixed cultures of A. ferrooxidans, A. thiooxidans and L. ferrooxidans. Pyrite-associated PGMsare expected to be generally prone to biodepression, whereas chalcopyrite-associated PGMs are expected to be generally recovered as the floatable phase. Sulphate-reducing bacteria were reported to have a dual role on the bioflotation of sulphide ores (flotation and depression), depending on the conditions. Therefore, this type of microorganism may serve as both a depressant or a collector in the recovery of PGMs. Based on the bioflotation response of pyrrhotite to L. ferrooxidans, it is anticipated that pyrrhotite-associated PGMS can be biodepressed using L. ferrooxidans. In terms of bioflocculation, PGMs associated with chalcopyrite may be recovered using L. ferrooxidans, whereas A. ferrooxidans, A. thiooxidans, B. polyxyma and B. subtilis can be used in the bioflocculation of pyrite-associated PGMs. M. phlei can be employed in the reverse bioflocculation of pyrite-associated PGMs. Although no information was found on the biobeneficiation of pentlandite, postulations were made based on other sulphide minerals. It was postulated that biobeneficiation (biodepression and bioflotation) with pentlandite-associated PGMs should be possible using A. ferrooxidans. It is also projected that sulphate-reducing bacteria will be suitable for the bioflotation of PGMs associated with pentlandite. The removal of gangue species such as silicates and chromites associated with PGM concentrates was also discussed. A. ferrooxidans, P. polymyxa and B. mucilaginous are candidates for the removal of gangue species. Furthermore, the need to control process conditions was highlighted. The most suitable conditions for biobeneficiation of the various base metal sulphide minerals associated with PGMs are presented in the paper. Most of the challenges associated with biobeneficiation of PGMs are already common to conventional methods, and the means of circumventing them are already well established. Developments in genetic engineering and the advent of new data science techniques are tools that could make the biobeneficiation of PGMs a possibility.

1985 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 1910-1918 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. A. Trudinger ◽  
L. A. Chambers ◽  
J. W. Smith

Sulphate is considered to have been a major source of sulphide in strata-bound and stratiform base-metal sulphide deposits. Many of these deposits, however, appear to have been formed at moderate temperatures (<200 °C), which poses the question, By what mechanism(s) was sulphate reduced to sulphide? Two modes of reduction have been established experimentally: (1) catalysis by sulphate-reducing bacteria, which at present is only known to occur below ca. 100 °C; and (2) abiological reduction by ferrous iron or organic matter, which has only been clearly shown above ca. 250 °C.Several attempts have been made to demonstrate abiological reduction below 200 °C, and some new data are presented here. Although the results do not exclude the possibility that such a reaction may be geochemically significant, there has been no unequivocal demonstration of nett sulphide formation from sulphate at these temperatures.Recent studies of the microbiology of hydrothermal regions have opened up the prospect of bacterial sulphate reduction at much higher temperatures than had earlier been thought possible.


1988 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 47-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Bao-rui

After artificial recharging of groundwater some problems occurred, such as changes in groundwater quality, the silting up of recharge (injection) wells, etc. Therefore, the mechanisms of microbial effects on groundwater quality after artificial recharging were studied in Shanghai and the district of Changzhou. These problems were approached on the basis of the amounts of biochemical reaction products generated by the metabolism of iron bacteria, sulphate-reducing bacteria, Thiobacillusthioparus, and Thiobacillusdenitrificans. The experiments showed that in the transformations occurring and the siltation of recharge wells, microorganisms play an important role, due to the various chemical and biochemical activities. A water-rock-microorganisms system is proposed, and some methods for the prevention and treatment of these effects are given.


1984 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.J. Crombie ◽  
G.J. Moody ◽  
J.D.R. Thomas

2010 ◽  
Vol 173 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 231-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shailesh Dave ◽  
Maitry Damani ◽  
Devayani Tipre

1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 357-360
Author(s):  
L Bolt ◽  
D C Ellwood ◽  
M J Hill ◽  
S Wootton ◽  
J H P Watson

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mool Chand Nihalani ◽  
S. Verma ◽  
J. Kumar ◽  
H. Dubey ◽  
Nripendra Kumar Bharali ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 206 ◽  
pp. 556-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirti Ranjan Das ◽  
Meenal Kowshik ◽  
M.K. Praveen Kumar ◽  
Savita Kerkar ◽  
S.K. Shyama ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document