scholarly journals A Spectroscopic Validation of the Improved Lennard–Jones Model

Molecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (13) ◽  
pp. 3906
Author(s):  
Rhuiago Mendes de Oliveira ◽  
Luiz Guilherme Machado de Macedo ◽  
Thiago Ferreira da Cunha ◽  
Fernando Pirani ◽  
Ricardo Gargano

The Lennard–Jones (LJ) and Improved Lennard–Jones (ILJ) potential models have been deeply tested on the most accurate CCSD(T)/CBS electronic energies calculated for some weakly bound prototype systems. These results are important to plan the correct application of such models to systems at increasing complexity. CCSD(T)/CBS ground state electronic energies were determined for 21 diatomic systems composed by the combination of the noble gas atoms. These potentials were employed to calculate the rovibrational spectroscopic constants, and the results show that for 20 of the 21 pairs the ILJ predictions agree more effectively with the experimental data than those of the LJ model. The CCSD(T)/CBS energies were also used to determine the β parameter of the ILJ form, related to the softness/hardness of the interacting partners and controlling the shape of the potential well. This information supports the experimental finding that suggests the adoption of β≈9 for most of the systems involving noble gas atoms. The He-Ne and He-Ar molecules have a lifetime of less than 1ps in the 200–500 K temperature range, indicating that they are not considered stable under thermal conditions of gaseous bulks. Furthermore, the controversy concerning the presence of a “virtual” or a “real” vibrational state in the He2 molecule is discussed.

1984 ◽  
Vol 62 (12) ◽  
pp. 1947-1953 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. C. D. Brand ◽  
D. Bussières ◽  
A. R. Hoy ◽  
S. M. Jaywant

A weakly bound Ω = 1 state of ICl, [Formula: see text], which converges to the ground state 1(2P3/2) + Cl(2P3/2) of the separated atoms, has been identified and characterized. Spectroscopic constants of this state are Te = 17 338.0(13), ωe = 32.85(48), ωexe = 1.272(40), 103Be = 38.2(13), 104αe = 8.89(34), 105γe = −8.1(20) cm−1, and re = 4.01(6) Å. The dissociation energy De = 219.6 cm−1 is consistent with the value predicted for a Morse function, [Formula: see text]. Transitions [Formula: see text] are allowed owing to homogeneous coupling between ã and the well-defined A(3π1) state; in fact, at medium-long range (r = 6–6.5 Å, D–Gν = 20–30 cm−1), the diabatic ã and A curves cross at a small angle. Principal features of the crossing are explained if the electronic interaction matrix element is ca. 4 cm−1, corresponding to weak coupling. Heterogeneous perturbations of the A and ã states in the range D–Gν < 200 cm−1 are attributed to coupling with high vibrational levels of the ground state X(1Σ+).


2005 ◽  
Vol 123 (10) ◽  
pp. 104312 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Boucher ◽  
David B. Strasfeld ◽  
Richard A. Loomis ◽  
John M. Herbert ◽  
Sara E. Ray ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 71 (10) ◽  
pp. 1645-1654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel Tellinghuisen

The 2880 Å system in the Tesla discharge spectrum of I2 in Ar is reexamined using a CCD array detector to record spectra for both 127I2 and 129I2. This charge-transfer transition terminates on a weakly bound valence state, giving a highly congested spectrum with fine violet-degraded band structure barely perceivable on a pseudocontinuous background. The superior signal-to-noise capabilities of the array detector permit a great improvement in the precision and number of measured bandheads, as compared with previous results obtained from photographically recorded spectra. The new data span a larger range of vibrational levels in the lower state and lead to a change in the previous ν″ numbering by −3 units. Both states can now be located precisely on the absolute energy axis through least-squares fits in which the lower state energy is represented as a near-dissociation expansion. The primary spectroscopic constants (cm−1) are [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] The lower state has a dissociation energy of 287.5 cm−1 and supports 35 bound levels, subject, however, to possible further revision due to a remaining uncertainty of 1 unit in the ν″ numbering. The previous tentative electronic assignment of this system remains in effect: The upper state is likely the [Formula: see text] state that correlates with I−(1S) + I+(3P1), while the lower state is the [Formula: see text] component of the lowest valence 3Πu multiplet.


2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (21n23) ◽  
pp. 1842-1845
Author(s):  
K. HAGINO ◽  
H. SAGAWA ◽  
T. OISHI

Using a three-body model with density-dependent contact interaction, we discuss the role of dineutron correlation in the ground state properties as well as in the dipole excitation of typical weakly-bound Borromean nuclei, 11 Li and 6 He . We show that, while both the nuclei manifest themselves similar strong dineutron correlations to each other in the ground state, the energy distributions for the two emitted neutrons from the dipole excitation are considerably different. We also discuss briefly the diproton correlation in a proton-rich Borromean nucleus, 17 Ne .


1979 ◽  
Vol 78 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koichi Yamada ◽  
Manfred Winnewisser ◽  
Gisbert Winnewisser ◽  
L.B. Szalanski ◽  
M.C.L. Gerry

2009 ◽  
Vol 87 (11) ◽  
pp. 1163-1169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Hamade ◽  
F. Taher ◽  
M. Choueib ◽  
Y. Monteil

The theoretical electronic structure of the LuF molecule is investigated, using the Complete Active-Space Self-Consistent Field CASSCF and the MultiReference Configuration Interaction MRCI methods. These methods are performed for 26 electronic states in the representation 2s+1Λ(+/−), neglecting spin–orbit effects. Spectroscopic constants including the harmonic vibrational wave number ωe (cm–1), the relative electronic energy Te (cm–1) referred to the ground state and the equilibrium internuclear distance Re (Å) are predicted for all the singlet and triplet electronic states situated below 50 000 cm–1. Calculated potential energy curves are also reported.


2000 ◽  
Vol 200 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.S.P. Müller ◽  
G. Winnewisser ◽  
J. Demaison ◽  
A. Perrin ◽  
A. Valentin

2017 ◽  
Vol 146 (1) ◽  
pp. 014305 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Stipanović ◽  
L. Vranješ Markić ◽  
D. Zarić ◽  
J. Boronat

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document