scholarly journals NUTRIC and Modified NUTRIC are Accurate Predictors of Outcome in End-Stage Liver Disease: A Validation in Critically Ill Patients with Liver Cirrhosis

Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 2134
Author(s):  
Ulrich Mayr ◽  
Julia Pfau ◽  
Marina Lukas ◽  
Ulrike Bauer ◽  
Alexander Herner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Area Under Curve ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Predictors Of Outcome ◽  
Discriminative Ability ◽  
Nutrition Risk ◽  
Prognostic Accuracy ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients ◽  
End Stage

Malnutrition in critically ill patients with cirrhosis is a frequent but often overlooked complication with high prognostic relevance. The Nutrition Risk in Critically ill (NUTRIC) score and its modified variant (mNUTRIC) were established to assess the nutrition risk of intensive care unit patients. Considering the high mortality of cirrhosis in critically ill patients, this study aims to evaluate the discriminative ability of NUTRIC and mNUTRIC to predict outcome. We performed a retro-prospective evaluation in 150 Caucasian cirrhotic patients admitted to our ICU. Comparative prognostic analyses between NUTRIC and mNUTRIC were assessed in 114 patients. On ICU admission, a large proportion of 65% were classified as high NUTRIC (6–10) and 75% were categorized as high mNUTRIC (5–9). High nutritional risk was linked to disease severity and poor outcome. NUTRIC was moderately superior to mNUTRIC in prediction of 28-day mortality (area under curve 0.806 vs. 0.788) as well as 3-month mortality (area under curve 0.839 vs. 0.819). We found a significant association of NUTRIC and mNUTRIC with MELD, CHILD, renal function, interleukin 6 and albumin, but not with body mass index. NUTRIC and mNUTRIC are characterized by high prognostic accuracy in critically ill patients with cirrhosis. NUTRIC revealed a moderate advantage in prognostic ability compared to mNUTRIC.

scholarly journals Comparison of Feeding Efficiency and Hospital Mortality between Small Bowel and Nasogastric Tube Feeding in Critically Ill Patients at High Nutritional Risk

Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 2009
Author(s):  
Wei-Ning Wang ◽  
Chen-Yu Wang ◽  
Chiann-Yi Hsu ◽  
Pin-Kuei Fu
Keyword(s):  
Small Bowel ◽  
Enteral Nutrition ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Energy Intake ◽  
Nasogastric Tube ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Nutrition Risk ◽  
Achievement Rate

Nasogastric tube enteral nutrition (NGEN) should be initiated within 48 h for patients at high nutritional risk. However, whether small bowel enteral nutrition (SBEN) should be routinely used instead of NGEN to improve hospital mortality remains unclear. We retrospectively analyzed 113 critically ill patients with modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score ≥ 5 and feeding volume < 750 mL/day in the first week of their stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). Age, sex, mNUTRIC score, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score were matched in the SBEN (n = 48) and NGEN (n = 65) groups. Through a univariate analysis, factors associated with hospital mortality were SBEN group (hazard ratio (HR), 0.56; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.31–1.00), Simplified Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score on day 7 (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03–1.22), and energy intake achievement rate < 65% (HR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.25–5.11). A multivariate analysis indicated that energy intake achievement rate < 65% on the third follow-up day (HR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.12–4.69) was the only factor independently associated with mortality. We suggest initiation of SBEN on the seventh ICU day before parenteral nutrition initiation for critically ill patients at high nutrition risk.

SUN-LB644: Nutritional Risk Assessment in Critically Ill Patients Using Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (NUTRIC) Score

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 ◽  
pp. S298-S299
Author(s):  
R. Kalavathy ◽  
Sumaya Ahmed Al Araj ◽  
Nazneen Zara ◽  
Yousuf Altair ◽  
Khadra Omer
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Nutrition Risk

scholarly journals Use of mNUTRIC-Score for Nutrition Risk Assessment and Prognosis Prediction in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19: A Retrospective Observational Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Francisco G. Yanowsky-Escatell ◽  
Areli L. Ontiveros-Galindo ◽  
Kevin J. Arellano-Arteaga ◽  
Luis M. Román-Pintos ◽  
Carlos A. Andrade-Castellanos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Mortality Risk ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Retrospective Observational Study ◽  
Nutrition Risk ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis

Introduction. Nutritional risk is highly prevalent in patients with COVID-19. Relevant data on nutritional assessment in the critically ill population are scarce. This study was conducted to evaluate the modified Nutrition Risk in the Critically Ill (mNUTRIC)-Score as a mortality risk factor in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19. Methods. We conducted this retrospective observational study in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Patients’ characteristics and clinical information were obtained from electronic medical records. The nutritional risk for each patient was assessed at the time of mechanical ventilation using the mNUTRIC-Score. The major outcome was 28-day mortality. Results. Ninety-eight patients were analyzed (mean age, 57.22 ± 13.66 years, 68.4% male); 46.9% of critically ill COVID-19 patients were categorized as being at high nutrition risk (mNUTRIC-Score of ≥5). A multivariate logistic regression model indicated that high nutritional risk has higher 28-day hospital mortality (OR = 4.206, 95% CI: 1.147–15.425, p = 0.030 ). A multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that high-risk mNUTRIC-Score had a significantly increased full-length mortality risk during hospitalization (OR = 1.991, 95% CI: 1.219–3.252, p = 0.006 ). Conclusion. The mNUTRIC-Score is an independent mortality risk factor during hospitalization in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

scholarly journals Lower serum chloride concentrations are associated with increased risk of mortality in critically ill cirrhotic patients: an analysis of the MIMIC-III database

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Ji ◽  
Libin Li
Keyword(s):  
Critically Ill ◽  
Serum Sodium ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Icu Mortality ◽  
Independent Prognostic Marker ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
Serum Chloride ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients ◽  
End Stage

Abstract Background Cirrhosis can be complicated by electrolyte abnormalities, but the major focus has been concentrated on the clinical significance of serum sodium levels. Emerging studies have identified hypochloremia as an independent prognostic marker in patients with chronic heart failure and chronic kidney disease. The aim of this study was to investigate whether serum chloride levels were associated with mortality of critically ill cirrhotic patients. Methods Critically ill cirrhotic patients were identified from the Multi-parameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care III Database. The primary outcome was ICU mortality. Logistic regression was used to explore the association between serum chloride levels and ICU mortality. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) was used to assess the performance of serum chloride levels for predicting ICU mortality. Results A total of 1216 critically ill cirrhotic patients were enrolled in this study. The overall ICU mortality rate was 18.8%. Patients with hypochloremia had a higher ICU mortality than those with non-hypochloremia (34.2% vs. 15.8%; p < 0.001). After multivariable risk adjustment for age, gender, ethnicity, chloride, sodium, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, Elixhauser comorbidity index, mechanical ventilation, vasopressors, renal replacement therapy, acute kidney injury, hemoglobin, platelet, and white blood cell, serum chloride levels remained independently associated with ICU mortality (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.91–0.98; p = 0.002) in contrast to serum sodium levels, which were no longer significant (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.99–1.08; p = 0.119). The AUC of serum chloride levels (AUC, 0.600; 95% CI 0.556–0.643) for ICU mortality was statistically higher than that of serum sodium levels (AUC, 0.544; 95% CI 0.499–0.590) (p < 0.001). Conclusions In critically ill cirrhotic patients, serum chloride levels are independently and inversely associated with ICU mortality, thus highlighting the prognostic role of serum chloride levels which are largely overlooked.

scholarly journals Full versus Trophic Feeds in Critically Ill Adults with High and Low Nutritional Risk Scores: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 3518
Author(s):  
Chen-Yu Wang ◽  
Pin-Kuei Fu ◽  
Wen-Cheng Chao ◽  
Wei-Ning Wang ◽  
Chao-Hsiu Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Nutrition Risk ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Trophic Feeding

Although energy intake might be associated with clinical outcomes in critically ill patients, it remains unclear whether full or trophic feeding is suitable for critically ill patients with high or low nutrition risk. We conducted a prospective study to determine which feeding energy intakes were associated with clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with high or low nutrition risk. This was an investigator-initiated, single center, single blind, randomized controlled trial. Critically ill patients were allocated to either high or low nutrition risk based on their Nutrition Risk in the Critically Ill score, and then randomized to receive either the full or the trophic feeding. The feeding procedure was administered for six days. No significant differences were observed in hospital, 14-day and 28-day mortalities, the length of ventilator dependency, or ICU and hospital stay among the four groups. There were no associations between energy and protein intakes and hospital, 14-day and 28-day mortalities in any of the four groups. However, protein intake was positively associated with the length of hospital stay and ventilator dependency in patients with low nutrition risk receiving trophic feeding. Full or trophic feeding in critically ill patients showed no associations with clinical outcomes, regardless of nutrition risk.

scholarly journals The use of MELD scores in critically ill cirrhotic patients

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (16) ◽  
pp. 45
Author(s):  
Supannee Rassameehiran ◽  
Tinsay Woreta
Keyword(s):  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Liver Disease ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Organ Failure ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Meld Score ◽  
Chronic Liver Failure ◽  
End Stage Liver Disease ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients ◽  
End Stage

The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) was originally created to predict survival following transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt and was subsequently found to accurately predict mortality in patients with end-stage liver disease. It has been used in the United States for liver allocation since 2002, and implementation of the MELD score resulted in a reduction in total number of deaths on the waitlist and a reduction in waiting time. Critically ill cirrhotic patients have an in-hospital mortality greater than 50%. Although the MELD score was also found to be an accurate predictor of in-ICU mortality and in-hospital mortality after ICU admission in critically ill cirrhotic patients, the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score appears to perform better in many studies. The Chronic Liver Failure Consortium Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (CLIF-C ACLF) score was later developed by using specific cut-points for each organ failure score system in CLIF patients to predict mortality in patients with ACLF. Neither the MELD nor SOFA score independently predicts post-liver transplantation mortality in cirrhotic patients with extrahepatic organ failure and should not be use as a delisting criterion for these patients. More data are needed to determine the accuracy of the CLIF-C ACLF score in predicting post-liver transplantation outcomes. Prospective evaluation of critically ill cirrhotic patients is needed to optimize liver organ allocation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document