Land management issues in rural administrative districts

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
V.G. Bryzhko ◽  
I.V. Bryzhko

The article deals with the main problems of the modern system of land management in rural administrative districts. The authors proposed a set of political, regulatory, institutional, and technological measures for land management improvement in municipal districts.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanislav Lipski

The book investigates how post-Soviet Russia implemented and continues the process of transformation of legislation on land management and cadastral relations. To do this consistently analysed as formed the modern understanding of land management and cadastre in Russia, their relationship with each other, as well as the corresponding foreign experience; how has the positioning in the modern system of law governing their regulations; as for the last 25-30 years to develop land legislation and system of bodies of land management; as organized by the land management and cadastral activities; what are the legal issues peculiar to them now and how they are solved. Presented in the monograph the results reflect the tendencies and regularities in the sphere of legislative regulation of land relations and cadastre, explain the reasons which influenced the selection by the legislator of an option development of an appropriate legal framework. For students and teachers, and anyone interested in land law.


2021 ◽  
pp. 63-68
Author(s):  
Valeriia Borzenkova

Land management activities in Ukraine are at the stage of gradual legislative reform, which takes place through deregulation and simplification of land management procedures. The analysis of Canada's practical experience in regulating land management activities allows Ukraine to create a single organization consisting of committees on certain land management issues, which will contribute to the development and effective work in this area.


1993 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 10-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liliana Marulanda ◽  
Florian Steinberg

2020 ◽  
Vol 118 (6) ◽  
pp. 569-575
Author(s):  
Catrin M Edgeley ◽  
Amanda M Stasiewicz ◽  
Darcy H Hammond

Abstract Combining Q-methodology with focus groups offers a novel opportunity to explore how researchers and managers can collectively address natural resource management issues. We explored the potential utility of this pairing for prioritizing long-term vegetation recovery research needs after wildfire at a two-day workshop. The approach entailed individual Q-sort activities, followed by focus group discussion about differences and similarities in Q-sort outcomes between managers and researchers. We found that Q-methodology was a versatile discussion tool that offered opportunities for building shared definitions of management issues and identifying new pathways for collaboration between diverse participants. Group discussion around research needs also fostered opportunities for identifying organizational barriers and fostering partnerships to overcome them. Collecting social data on research needs prior to designing or conducting data collection efforts can help ensure that outputs have practical value and utility for land management. Study Implications Establishing shared research priorities between researchers and managers is one way to ensure that scientific advancements have practical applications. Using outputs from Q-sort activities as a prompt to initiate discussion between researchers and managers is an effective technique for understanding divergent prioritizations, identifying organizational and scientific barriers, and establishing feasible next steps for collective action to produce application-oriented research. Employing mixed-method social data collection early in the land management planning process is increasingly valuable; many recent policies for forest and natural resource management require the incorporation of collaborative components.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document