Land Management Issues

2017 ◽  
pp. 314-358
Author(s):  
Zachary A. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Land Management ◽  
Management Issues

scholarly journals Comparative Analysis of Ukrainian and Canadian Legislation Regulating the Land Management

2021 ◽  
pp. 63-68
Author(s):  
Valeriia Borzenkova
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Land Management ◽  
Practical Experience ◽  
Effective Work ◽  
Legislative Reform ◽  
Management Procedures ◽  
Management Issues

Land management activities in Ukraine are at the stage of gradual legislative reform, which takes place through deregulation and simplification of land management procedures. The analysis of Canada's practical experience in regulating land management activities allows Ukraine to create a single organization consisting of committees on certain land management issues, which will contribute to the development and effective work in this area.

Land management issues in rural administrative districts

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
V.G. Bryzhko ◽  
I.V. Bryzhko
Keyword(s):  
Land Management ◽  
Modern System ◽  
Management Issues ◽  
Management Improvement

The article deals with the main problems of the modern system of land management in rural administrative districts. The authors proposed a set of political, regulatory, institutional, and technological measures for land management improvement in municipal districts.

Country profile: Indonesia — Land Management issues in Jakarta

1993 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 10-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liliana Marulanda ◽  
Florian Steinberg
Keyword(s):  
Land Management ◽  
Management Issues

Prioritizing Research Needs in Natural Resources: Using Q-Methodology as a Focus Group Discussion Tool

2020 ◽  
Vol 118 (6) ◽  
pp. 569-575
Author(s):  
Catrin M Edgeley ◽  
Amanda M Stasiewicz ◽  
Darcy H Hammond
Keyword(s):  
Focus Group ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Natural Resource Management ◽  
Land Management ◽  
Natural Resource ◽  
Q Methodology ◽  
Group Discussion ◽  
Research Needs ◽  
Q Sort ◽  
Management Issues

Abstract Combining Q-methodology with focus groups offers a novel opportunity to explore how researchers and managers can collectively address natural resource management issues. We explored the potential utility of this pairing for prioritizing long-term vegetation recovery research needs after wildfire at a two-day workshop. The approach entailed individual Q-sort activities, followed by focus group discussion about differences and similarities in Q-sort outcomes between managers and researchers. We found that Q-methodology was a versatile discussion tool that offered opportunities for building shared definitions of management issues and identifying new pathways for collaboration between diverse participants. Group discussion around research needs also fostered opportunities for identifying organizational barriers and fostering partnerships to overcome them. Collecting social data on research needs prior to designing or conducting data collection efforts can help ensure that outputs have practical value and utility for land management. Study Implications Establishing shared research priorities between researchers and managers is one way to ensure that scientific advancements have practical applications. Using outputs from Q-sort activities as a prompt to initiate discussion between researchers and managers is an effective technique for understanding divergent prioritizations, identifying organizational and scientific barriers, and establishing feasible next steps for collective action to produce application-oriented research. Employing mixed-method social data collection early in the land management planning process is increasingly valuable; many recent policies for forest and natural resource management require the incorporation of collaborative components.

Methods and Concepts of Land Management

2020 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Land Management ◽  
European Academy ◽  
Experimental Field ◽  
Interdisciplinary Nature ◽  
The Common ◽  
Management Issues

The peer reviewed papers in this new volume of the European Academy of Land Use and Development (EALD) inform about investigations on the common subject "land management" – due to the interdisciplinary nature of the EALD from very different views. The spectrum of contributions covers regulations, governance and the implementation of land management as well as the assessment of relevant data supporting these tasks. Various approaches, methods, systems and understanding of the government’s role in the different countries of Europe are highlighted. Committed to sustainability, the articles give evidence that Europe provides an experimental field for land management issues, and they enable to increase knowledge of new practices, to verify them and to learn from each other.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document