Summary
We investigated changes in anastomotic stricture indexes (SIs) and stricture diameter (SD) between before and 6 months after the first dilatation in children with anastomotic stricture after esophageal atresia (EA) repair and identified predictors of medium-term dilatation success (success for at least 3 months). We retrospectively reviewed the records and measurement indexes of patients who underwent post-EA repair endoscopic balloon dilatation between November 2017 and August 2019 in our hospital. We identified diagnostic and performance indicators that predicted medium-term dilatation success by univariate and multivariate analyses and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Sixty patients (34 boys and 26 girls) showed post-EA repair anastomotic stricture. Paired sample t-tests showed that SD (P < 0.001), upper pouch SI (U-SI, P < 0.001), lower pouch SI (L-SI, P < 0.001), upper pouch esophageal anastomotic SI (U-EASI, P < 0.001) and lower pouch EASI (L-EASI, P < 0.001) were significantly better at 6 months after than before the first dilatation. Logistic regression analysis showed that dilatation number (P = 0.002) and U-SI at 6 months after the first dilatation (P = 0.019) significantly predicted medium-term dilatation success. ROC curve analysis revealed that combining U-SI (cut-off value = 55.6%) and dilatation number (cut-off value = 10) had good accuracy in predicting medium-term dilatation success 6 months after the first dilatation (area under the curve-ROC: 0.95). In conclusion, endoscopic balloon dilatation significantly improved SD and SIs in children with post-EA repair anastomotic stricture. Dilatation number and U-SI at 6 months after the first dilatation were useful in predicting medium-term dilatation success and could represent a supplementary method to improve judgment regarding whether further dilatation is needed 6 months after the first dilatation.
Endoscopic balloon dilatation for benign hepaticojejunostomy anastomotic stricture using short double-balloon enteroscopy in patients with a prior Whipple’s procedure: a retrospective study
