Changing Security Environment in Northeast Asia and South Korea’s Security Dilemma

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-73
Author(s):  
Jung-Yeop Woo
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 114-119
Author(s):  
Медведев ◽  
Dmitriy Medvedev

The article describes the long-term trends in the development of international relations in the Arctic, the strategic importance of the region in modern international relations is proved. By analyzing the foreign policy strategies of the polar states the possible directions of international cooperation are formulated, threats to the development of constructive cooperation in the region are identified. The trends and key integration structures of military and political cooperation in the region are described, for the study of development prospects of the situation the concept of «security dilemma» is applied. The author describes the conditions necessary to reduce the tension in the region and the establishment of a non-confrontational model of world political development in the Arctic. In particular, the recognition of insolvency of isolation policy, as well as the rejection of the fragmentation of international security environment in the Arctic will allow to overcome the destructive tendencies of development and increase the possibility to maintain a mutually acceptable dialogue.


Author(s):  
Richard Jackson

This chapter focuses on regime security, the condition where governing elites are secure from violent challenges to their rule, and the unique security dilemma facing many developing countries. It first considers the security threats facing states with weak institutional and coercive capacity and lack of national cohesion — the so-called weak states — before describing the kinds of security strategies that weak-state elites often adopt to try and manage their predicament. In particular, it examines the weak states’ ‘insecurity dilemma’, a security environment in which the primary threats to security originate from internal rather than external sources. The chapter proceeds with an analysis of several competing theoretical explanations for how the weak state predicament arose and why it persists. It concludes with an assessment of international attempts to build security in weak states, along with the long-term prospects of transforming weak states into strong states.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-217
Author(s):  
Ji-Yong Lee

The security environment of the South China Sea has been disrupted as China strengthens its efforts at maritime ambition. The recent security situation in the Asia-Pacific, particularly the South China Sea, is characterised by arms building and balancing against China. It raises the possibility of conflict. For securing stability and peace, it is time to bring multilateralism back in, since a multilateral security framework contributes to taking the edge off power politics. However, there is no reliable multilateral framework to deal with the declining maritime security environment. This article highlights the lack of a multilateral framework and suggests an eclectic approach to multilateralism for securing the Asia-Pacific maritime order.


Author(s):  
Semyon Verbitsky ◽  
Tsuyoshi Hasegawa ◽  
Gilbert Rozman

The twentieth century has witnessed repeated occasions when Japan and Russia have taken each other's measure and decided on policy accordingly. In the years 1985 to 1999 such mutual testing occuned again amidst adjustments in the direction of each country's global role. As has often been the case, the RussoJapanese relationship was not the main event on the world stage. Both countries placed higher priority on relations with the United States and with China. But to rank this bilateral relationship below two others is not to belittle the stakes involved. For Russia, Tokyo's strategy to look east or west and within Asia to focus in the northeast or the southeast has throughout the century made a great difference in war or peace, in development or isolation. For Japan, Moscow's strategy to balance west and east, and in the east to concentrate on China or Japan, has had telling consequences for other foreign policy choices. At stake in this bilateral relationship have been the development of Siberia and the Russian Far East; the security environment in Northeast Asia including Korea; the prospects of triangular or quadrangular relations with China and the United States; and the balance of power among the world's great powers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document