Faculty Opinions recommendation of ATM signaling facilitates repair of DNA double-strand breaks associated with heterochromatin.

Author(s):  
Michael B Yaffe
2008 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron A. Goodarzi ◽  
Angela T. Noon ◽  
Dorothee Deckbar ◽  
Yael Ziv ◽  
Yosef Shiloh ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 184-185
Author(s):  
A. Mouche ◽  
J. Archambeau ◽  
C. Ricordel ◽  
L. Chaillot ◽  
N. Bigot ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (18) ◽  
pp. 5724-5735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Wu ◽  
Titia de Lange

ABSTRACT Dysfunctional telomeres elicit the canonical DNA damage response, which includes the activation of the ATM or ATR kinase signaling pathways and end processing by nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) or homologous recombination (HR). The cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks has been proposed to involve chromatin remodeling and nucleosome eviction, but whether dysfunctional telomeres undergo chromatin reorganization is not known. Here, we report on the nucleosomal organization of telomeres that have become deprotected through the deletion of the shelterin components TRF2 or POT1. We found no evidence of changes in the nucleosomal organization of the telomeric chromatin or nucleosome eviction near the telomere terminus. An unaltered chromatin structure was observed at telomeres lacking TRF2, which activate the ATM kinase and are a substrate for NHEJ. Similarly, telomeres lacking POT1a and POT1b, which activate the ATR kinase, showed no overt nucleosome eviction. Finally, telomeres lacking TRF2 and Ku70, which are processed by HR, appeared to maintain their original nucleosomal organization. We conclude that ATM signaling, ATR signaling, NHEJ, and HR at deprotected telomeres can take place in the absence of overt nucleosome eviction.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 2344-2357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Audrey Mouche ◽  
Jérôme Archambeau ◽  
Charles Ricordel ◽  
Laura Chaillot ◽  
Nicolas Bigot ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 765-777 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yixi Xu ◽  
Dongyi Xu

Abstract Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is at a constant risk of damage from endogenous substances, environmental radiation, and chemical stressors. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) pose a significant threat to genomic integrity and cell survival. There are two major pathways for DSB repair: nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR). The extent of DNA end resection, which determines the length of the 3′ single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) overhang, is the primary factor that determines whether repair is carried out via NHEJ or HR. NHEJ, which does not require a 3′ ssDNA tail, occurs throughout the cell cycle. 53BP1 and the cofactors PTIP or RIF1-shieldin protect the broken DNA end, inhibit long-range end resection and thus promote NHEJ. In contrast, HR mainly occurs during the S/G2 phase and requires DNA end processing to create a 3′ tail that can invade a homologous region, ensuring faithful gene repair. BRCA1 and the cofactors CtIP, EXO1, BLM/DNA2, and the MRE11–RAD50–NBS1 (MRN) complex promote DNA end resection and thus HR. DNA resection is influenced by the cell cycle, the chromatin environment, and the complexity of the DNA end break. Herein, we summarize the key factors involved in repair pathway selection for DSBs and discuss recent related publications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document