scholarly journals ING3 is required for ATM signaling and DNA repair in response to DNA double strand breaks

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 184-185
Author(s):  
A. Mouche ◽  
J. Archambeau ◽  
C. Ricordel ◽  
L. Chaillot ◽  
N. Bigot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Atm Signaling

scholarly journals ING3 is required for ATM signaling and DNA repair in response to DNA double strand breaks

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 2344-2357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Audrey Mouche ◽  
Jérôme Archambeau ◽  
Charles Ricordel ◽  
Laura Chaillot ◽  
Nicolas Bigot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Atm Signaling

scholarly journals End-resection at DNA double-strand breaks in the three domains of life

2013 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 314-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
John K. Blackwood ◽  
Neil J. Rzechorzek ◽  
Sian M. Bray ◽  
Joseph D. Maman ◽  
Luca Pellegrini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Domains Of Life ◽  
Strand Invasion ◽  
End Resection

During DNA repair by HR (homologous recombination), the ends of a DNA DSB (double-strand break) must be resected to generate single-stranded tails, which are required for strand invasion and exchange with homologous chromosomes. This 5′–3′ end-resection of the DNA duplex is an essential process, conserved across all three domains of life: the bacteria, eukaryota and archaea. In the present review, we examine the numerous and redundant helicase and nuclease systems that function as the enzymatic analogues for this crucial process in the three major phylogenetic divisions.

scholarly journals Recent advances in the nucleolar responses to DNA double-strand breaks

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (17) ◽  
pp. 9449-9461
Author(s):  
Lea Milling Korsholm ◽  
Zita Gál ◽  
Blanca Nieto ◽  
Oliver Quevedo ◽  
Stavroula Boukoura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Ribosomal Dna ◽  
Repetitive Sequences ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Response

Abstract DNA damage poses a serious threat to human health and cells therefore continuously monitor and repair DNA lesions across the genome. Ribosomal DNA is a genomic domain that represents a particular challenge due to repetitive sequences, high transcriptional activity and its localization in the nucleolus, where the accessibility of DNA repair factors is limited. Recent discoveries have significantly extended our understanding of how cells respond to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in the nucleolus, and new kinases and multiple down-stream targets have been identified. Restructuring of the nucleolus can occur as a consequence of DSBs and new data point to an active regulation of this process, challenging previous views. Furthermore, new insights into coordination of cell cycle phases and ribosomal DNA repair argue against existing concepts. In addition, the importance of nucleolar-DNA damage response (n-DDR) mechanisms for maintenance of genome stability and the potential of such factors as anti-cancer targets is becoming apparent. This review will provide a detailed discussion of recent findings and their implications for our understanding of the n-DDR. The n-DDR shares features with the DNA damage response (DDR) elsewhere in the genome but is also emerging as an independent response unique to ribosomal DNA and the nucleolus.

scholarly journals Differences in the recruitment of DNA repair proteins at subtelomeric and interstitial I-SceI endonuclease-induced DNA double-strand breaks

DNA Repair ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 49 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bárbara Alcaraz Silva ◽  
Trevor J. Jones ◽  
John P. Murnane
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Repair Proteins

scholarly journals The role of ubiquitin-dependent segregase p97 (VCP or Cdc48) in chromatin dynamics after DNA double strand breaks

2017 ◽  
Vol 372 (1731) ◽  
pp. 20160282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ignacio Torrecilla ◽  
Judith Oehler ◽  
Kristijan Ramadan
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Chromatin Remodelling ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Chromatin Dynamics ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Signalling Molecules

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are the most cytotoxic DNA lesions and, if not repaired, lead to chromosomal rearrangement, genomic instability and cell death. Cells have evolved a complex network of DNA repair and signalling molecules which promptly detect and repair DSBs, commonly known as the DNA damage response (DDR). The DDR is orchestrated by various post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation, methylation, ubiquitination or SUMOylation. As DSBs are located in complex chromatin structures, the repair of DSBs is engineered at two levels: (i) at sites of broken DNA and (ii) at chromatin structures that surround DNA lesions. Thus, DNA repair and chromatin remodelling machineries must work together to efficiently repair DSBs. Here, we summarize the current knowledge of the ubiquitin-dependent molecular unfoldase/segregase p97 (VCP in vertebrates and Cdc48 in worms and lower eukaryotes) in DSB repair. We identify p97 as an essential factor that regulates DSB repair. p97-dependent extraction of ubiquitinated substrates mediates spatio-temporal protein turnover at and around the sites of DSBs, thus orchestrating chromatin remodelling and DSB repair. As p97 is a druggable target, p97 inhibition in the context of DDR has great potential for cancer therapy, as shown for other DDR components such as PARP, ATR and CHK1. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Chromatin modifiers and remodellers in DNA repair and signalling’.

scholarly journals Division-induced DNA double strand breaks in the chromosome terminus region of Escherichia coli lacking RecBCD DNA repair enzyme

PLoS Genetics ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. e1006895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anurag Kumar Sinha ◽  
Adeline Durand ◽  
Jean-Michel Desfontaines ◽  
Ielyzaveta Iurchenko ◽  
Hélène Auger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Repair Enzyme ◽  
Strand Breaks

PARP-1 regulation of DNA repair factor availability.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 269-269
Author(s):  
Matthew Joseph Schiewer ◽  
Amy C Mandigo ◽  
Nicolas Gordon ◽  
Christopher McNair ◽  
Costas D. Lallas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Transcriptional Profiling ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Repair ◽  
Mechanistic Investigation ◽  
Androgen Receptor Activity ◽  
Repair Factor ◽  
Parp 1

269 Background: PARP-1 holds major functions on chromatin, DNA damage repair and transcriptional regulation, both of which are relevant in the context of cancer. Previously, it was determined that PARP-1 ins involved in regulation of androgen receptor activity. Methods: Here, unbiased transcriptional profiling revealed the downstream transcriptional profile of PARP-1 enzymatic activity.Results: Further investigation of the PARP-1-regulated transcriptome and secondary strategies for assessing PARP-1 activity in patient tissues revealed that PARP-1 activity was unexpectedly enriched as a function of disease progression and was associated with poor outcome independent of DNA double-strand breaks, suggesting that enhanced PARP-1 activity may promote aggressive phenotypes. Mechanistic investigation revealed that active PARP-1 served to enhance E2F1 transcription factor activity, and specifically promoted E2F1-mediated induction of DNA repair factors involved in homologous recombination (HR). Conversely, PARP-1 inhibition reduced HR factor availability and thus acted to induce or enhance “BRCA-ness”. Conclusions: These observations bring new understanding of PARP-1 function in cancer and have significant ramifications on predicting PARP-1 inhibitor function in the clinical setting.

scholarly journals Loss of autophagy causes a synthetic lethal deficiency in DNA repair

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (3) ◽  
pp. 773-778 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma Y. Liu ◽  
Naihan Xu ◽  
Jim O’Prey ◽  
Laurence Y. Lao ◽  
Sanket Joshi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Repair Process ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Nonhomologous End Joining ◽  
Cytoplasmic Process ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Synthetic Lethal ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Genomic Damage

(Macro)autophagy delivers cellular constituents to lysosomes for degradation. Although a cytoplasmic process, autophagy-deficient cells accumulate genomic damage, but an explanation for this effect is currently unclear. We report here that inhibition of autophagy causes elevated proteasomal activity leading to enhanced degradation of checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1), a pivotal factor for the error-free DNA repair process, homologous recombination (HR). We show that loss of autophagy critically impairs HR and that autophagy-deficient cells accrue micronuclei and sub-G1 DNA, indicators of diminished genomic integrity. Moreover, due to impaired HR, autophagy-deficient cells are hyperdependent on nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) for repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Consequently, inhibition of NHEJ following DNA damage in the absence of autophagy results in persistence of genomic lesions and rapid cell death. Because autophagy deficiency occurs in several diseases, these findings constitute an important link between autophagy and DNA repair and highlight a synthetic lethal strategy to kill autophagy-deficient cells.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document