Faculty Opinions recommendation of Fgf8a induces neural crest indirectly through the activation of Wnt8 in the paraxial mesoderm.

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaya Kalcheim
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Paraxial Mesoderm

The developmental fate of the cephalic mesoderm in quail-chick chimeras

Development ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 114 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.F. Couly ◽  
P.M. Coltey ◽  
N.M. Le Douarin
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Paraxial Mesoderm ◽  
Avian Embryo ◽  
Facial Skeleton ◽  
Developmental Fate ◽  
Prechordal Mesoderm ◽  
The Face ◽  
Neural Crest Origin ◽  
Neurula Stage

The developmental fate of the cephalic paraxial and prechordal mesoderm at the late neurula stage (3-somite) in the avian embryo has been investigated by using the isotopic, isochronic substitution technique between quail and chick embryos. The territories involved in the operation were especially tiny and the size of the transplants was of about 150 by 50 to 60 microns. At that stage, the neural crest cells have not yet started migrating and the fate of mesodermal cells exclusively was under scrutiny. The prechordal mesoderm was found to give rise to the following ocular muscles: musculus rectus ventralis and medialis and musculus oblicus ventralis. The paraxial mesoderm was separated in two longitudinal bands: one median, lying upon the cephalic vesicles (median paraxial mesoderm—MPM); one lateral, lying upon the foregut (lateral paraxial mesoderm—LPM). The former yields the three other ocular muscles, contributes to mesencephalic meninges and has essentially skeletogenic potencies. It contributes to the corpus sphenoid bone, the orbitosphenoid bone and the otic capsules; the rest of the facial skeleton is of neural crest origin. At 3-somite stage, MPM is represented by a few cells only. The LPM is more abundant at that stage and has essentially myogenic potencies with also some contribution to connective tissue. However, most of the connective cells associated with the facial and hypobranchial muscles are of neural crest origin. The more important result of this work was to show that the cephalic mesoderm does not form dermis. This function is taken over by neural crest cells, which form both the skeleton and dermis of the face. If one draws a parallel between the so-called “somitomeres” of the head and the trunk somites, it appears that skeletogenic potencies are reduced in the former, which in contrast have kept their myogenic capacities, whilst the formation of skeleton and dermis has been essentially taken over by the neural crest in the course of evolution of the vertebrate head.

Taste buds develop autonomously from endoderm without induction by cephalic neural crest or paraxial mesoderm

Development ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 124 (5) ◽  
pp. 949-957 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.A. Barlow ◽  
R.G. Northcutt
Keyword(s):  
Epithelial Cells ◽  
Neural Crest ◽  
Explant Culture ◽  
Nerve Fibers ◽  
Taste Buds ◽  
Paraxial Mesoderm ◽  
Culture Techniques ◽  
Well Differentiated ◽  
Neural Crest Migration

Although it had long been believed that embryonic taste buds in vertebrates were induced to differentiate by ingrowing nerve fibers, we and others have recently shown that embryonic taste buds can develop normally in the complete absence of innervation. This leads to the question of which tissues, if any, induce the formation of taste buds in oropharyngeal endoderm. We proposed that taste buds, like many specialized epithelial cells, might arise via an inductive interaction between the endodermal epithelial cells that line the oropharynx and the adjacent mesenchyme that is derived from both cephalic neural crest and paraxial mesoderm. Using complementary grafting and explant culture techniques, however, we have now found that well-differentiated taste buds will develop in tissue completely devoid of neural crest and paraxial mesoderm derivatives. When the presumptive oropharyngeal region was removed from salamander embryos prior to the onset of cephalic neural crest migration, taste buds developed in grafts and explants coincident with their appearance in intact control embryos. Similarly, explants from neurulae in which movement of paraxial mesoderm had not yet begun also developed taste buds after 9–12 days in vitro. We conclude that neither cranial neural crest nor paraxial mesoderm is responsible for the induction of embryonic taste buds. Surprisingly, the ability to develop taste buds late in embryonic development seems to be an intrinsic feature of the oropharyngeal endoderm that is determined by the completion of gastrulation.

sucker encodes a zebrafish Endothelin-1 required for ventral pharyngeal arch development

Development ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 127 (17) ◽  
pp. 3815-3828 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.T. Miller ◽  
T.F. Schilling ◽  
K. Lee ◽  
J. Parker ◽  
C.B. Kimmel
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Paraxial Mesoderm ◽  
Dorsoventral Patterning ◽  
Surface Ectoderm ◽  
Pharyngeal Arches ◽  
Endothelin 1 ◽  
Lower Jaw ◽  
Arch Neural

Mutation of sucker (suc) disrupts development of the lower jaw and other ventral cartilages in pharyngeal segments of the zebrafish head. Our sequencing, cosegregation and rescue results indicate that suc encodes an Endothelin-1 (Et-1). Like mouse and chick Et-1, suc/et-1 is expressed in a central core of arch paraxial mesoderm and in arch epithelia, both surface ectoderm and pharyngeal endoderm, but not in skeletogenic neural crest. Long before chondrogenesis, suc/et-1 mutant embryos have severe defects in ventral arch neural crest expression of dHAND, dlx2, msxE, gsc, dlx3 and EphA3 in the anterior arches. Dorsal expression patterns are unaffected. Later in development, suc/et-1 mutant embryos display defects in mesodermal and endodermal tissues of the pharynx. Ventral premyogenic condensations fail to express myoD, which correlates with a ventral muscle defect. Further, expression of shh in endoderm of the first pharyngeal pouch fails to extend as far laterally as in wild types. We use mosaic analyses to show that suc/et-1 functions nonautonomously in neural crest cells, and is thus required in the environment of postmigratory neural crest cells to specify ventral arch fates. Our mosaic analyses further show that suc/et-1 nonautonomously functions in mesendoderm for ventral arch muscle formation. Collectively our results support a model for dorsoventral patterning of the gnathostome pharyngeal arches in which Et-1 in the environment of the postmigratory cranial neural crest specifies the lower jaw and other ventral arch fates.

Inhibition of noggin expression in the dorsal neural tube by somitogenesis: a mechanism for coordinating the timing of neural crest emigration

Development ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 127 (22) ◽  
pp. 4845-4854 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Sela-Donenfeld ◽  
C. Kalcheim
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Neural Tube ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Paraxial Mesoderm ◽  
Dorsal Neural Tube ◽  
Progressive Loss ◽  
Crest Cell ◽  
Rostral Part

We have previously shown that axial-dependent delamination of specified neural crest cells is triggered by BMP4 and negatively regulated by noggin. Increasing activity of BMP4 towards the rostral part of the axis is achieved by graded expression of noggin in the dorsal neural tube, the latter being high opposite unsegmented mesoderm, and progressively downregulated facing epithelial and dissociating somites, coinciding in time and axial level with initial delamination of neural crest cells (Sela-Donenfeld, D. and Kalcheim, C. (1999) Development 126, 4749–4762). Here we report that this gradient-like expression of noggin in the neuroepithelium is controlled by the paraxial mesoderm. Deletion of epithelial somites prevented normal downregulation of noggin in the neural tube. Furthermore, partial ablation of either the dorsal half or only the dorsomedial portion of epithelial somites was sufficient to maintain high noggin expression. In contrast, deletion of the segmental plate had no effect. These data suggest that the dorsomedial region of developing somites produces an inhibitor of noggin transcription in the dorsal neural tube. Consistent with this notion, grafting dissociating somites in the place of the unsegmented mesoderm precociously downregulated the expression of noggin and triggered premature emigration of neural crest progenitors from the caudal neural tube. Thus, opposite the unsegmented mesoderm, where noggin expression is high in the neural tube, BMP4 is inactive and neural crest cells fail to delaminate. Upon somitogenesis and further dissociation, the dorsomedial portion of the somite inhibits noggin transcription. Progressive loss of noggin activity releases BMP4 from inhibition, resulting in crest cell emigration. We propose that this inhibitory crosstalk between paraxial mesoderm and neural primordium controls the timing of neural crest delamination to match the development of a suitable mesodermal substrate for subsequent crest migration.

scholarly journals Fgf8a induces neural crest indirectly through the activation of Wnt8 in the paraxial mesoderm

Development ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 135 (23) ◽  
pp. 3903-3910 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.-S. Hong ◽  
B.-Y. Park ◽  
J.-P. Saint-Jeannet
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Paraxial Mesoderm

Involvement of neural crest and paraxial mesoderm in oral mucosal development and healing

Biomaterials ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 172 ◽  
pp. 41-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliane Isaac ◽  
Ali Nassif ◽  
Audrey Asselin ◽  
Ihsène Taïhi ◽  
Hélène Fohrer-Ting ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Paraxial Mesoderm

scholarly journals Pax3acts cell autonomously in the neural tube and somites by controlling cell surface properties

Development ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 128 (11) ◽  
pp. 1995-2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Mansouri ◽  
Patrick Pla ◽  
Lionel Larue ◽  
Peter Gruss
Keyword(s):  
Cell Surface ◽  
Neural Crest ◽  
Surface Properties ◽  
Neural Tube ◽  
Es Cells ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Neural Tube Closure ◽  
Paraxial Mesoderm ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Cell Surface Properties

Pax3 is a member of the paired-box-containing transcription factors. It is expressed in the developing somites, dorsal spinal cord, mesencephalon and neural crest derivatives. Several loss-of-function mutations are correlated with the Splotch phenotype in mice and Waardenburg syndrome in humans. Malformations include a lack of muscle in the limb, a failure of neural tube closure and dysgenesis of numerous neural crest derivatives. In this study we have used embryonic stem (ES) cells to generate a lacZ knock-in into the Pax3 locus. The Pax3 knock-in Splotch allele (Sp2G) was used to generate Pax3-deficient ES cells in order to investigate whether, in chimeric embryos, Pax3 is acting cell autonomously in the somites and the neural tube. We found that while Pax3 function is essential for the neuroepithelium and somites, a wild-type environment rescues mutant neural crest cells. In the two affected embryonic tissues, mutant and wild-type cells undergo segregation and do not intermingle.The contribution of mutant cells to the neural tube and the somites displayed temporal differences. All chimeric embryos showed a remarkable contribution of blue cells to the neural tube at all stages analyzed, indicating that the Pax3-deficient cells are not excluded from the neural epithelium while development proceeds. In contrast, this is not true for the paraxial mesoderm. The somite contribution of Pax3−/− ES cells becomes less frequent in older embryos as compared to controls with Pax3+/− ES cells. We propose that although Pax3 function is related to cell surface properties, its role may differ in various tissues. In fact, apoptosis was found in Pax3-deficient cells of the lateral dermomyotome but not in the neural tube.

The triple origin of skull in higher vertebrates: a study in quail-chick chimeras

Development ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 117 (2) ◽  
pp. 409-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.F. Couly ◽  
P.M. Coltey ◽  
N.M. Le Douarin
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Sella Turcica ◽  
Parietal Bone ◽  
Paraxial Mesoderm ◽  
Avian Embryo ◽  
Evolutionary Context ◽  
Embryonic Origin ◽  
Neural Crest Origin ◽  
Parietal Bones ◽  
Double Origin

We have used the quail-chick chimera technique to study the origin of the bones of the skull in the avian embryo. Although the contribution of the neural crest to the facial and visceral skeleton had been established previously, the origin of the vault of the skull (i.e. frontal and parietal bones) remained uncertain. Moreover formation of the occipito-otic region from either the somitic or the cephalic paraxial mesoderm had not been experimentally investigated. The data obtained in the present and previous works now allow us to assign a precise embryonic origin from either the mesectoderm, the paraxial cephalic mesoderm or the five first somites, to all the bones forming the avian skull. We distinguish a skull located in front of the extreme tip of the notochord which reaches the sella turcica and a skull located caudally to this boundary. The former ('prechordal skull') is derived entirely from the neural crest, the latter from the mesoderm (cephalic or somitic) in its ventromedial part ('chordal skull') and from the crest for the parietal bone and for part of the otic region. An important point enlighten in this work concerns the double origin of the corpus of the sphenoid in which basipresphenoid is of neural crest origin and the basipostsphenoid is formed by the cephalic mesoderm. Formation of the occipito-otic region of the skeleton is particularly complex and involves the cooperation of the five first somites and the paraxial mesoderm at the hind-brain level. The morphogenetic movements leading to the initial puzzle assembly could be visualized in a reproducible way by means of small grafts of quail mesodermal areas into chick embryos. The data reported here are discussed in the evolutionary context of the ‘New Head’ hypothesis of Gans and Northcutt (1983, Science, 220, 268–274).

The chinless mutation and neural crest cell interactions in zebrafish jaw development

Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (5) ◽  
pp. 1417-1426 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.F. Schilling ◽  
C. Walker ◽  
C.B. Kimmel
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Neural Crest Cell ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Paraxial Mesoderm ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Host Genotype ◽  
Pharyngeal Arches ◽  
Expression Studies ◽  
Gene Expression Studies ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest Cells

During vertebrate development, neural crest cells are thought to pattern many aspects of head organization, including the segmented skeleton and musculature of the jaw and gills. Here we describe mutations at the gene chinless, chn, that disrupt the skeletal fates of neural crest cells in the head of the zebrafish and their interactions with muscle precursors. chn mutants lack neural-crest-derived cartilage and mesoderm-derived muscles in all seven pharyngeal arches. Fate mapping and gene expression studies demonstrate the presence of both undifferentiated cartilage and muscle precursors in mutants. However, chn blocks differentiation directly in neural crest, and not in mesoderm, as revealed by mosaic analyses. Neural crest cells taken from wild-type donor embryos can form cartilage when transplanted into chn mutant hosts and rescue some of the patterning defects of mutant pharyngeal arches. In these cases, cartilage only forms if neural crest is transplanted at least one hour before its migration, suggesting that interactions occur transiently in early jaw precursors. In contrast, transplanted cells in paraxial mesoderm behave according to the host genotype; mutant cells form jaw muscles in a wild-type environment. These results suggest that chn is required for the development of pharyngeal cartilages from cranial neural crest cells and subsequent crest signals that pattern mesodermally derived myocytes.

scholarly journals Cranial Neural Crest Cells and Their Role in the Pathogenesis of Craniofacial Anomalies and Coronal Craniosynostosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica M. Siismets ◽  
Nan E. Hatch
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Parietal Bone ◽  
Paraxial Mesoderm ◽  
Treacher Collins Syndrome ◽  
Craniofacial Anomalies ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest ◽  
Craniofacial Skeleton ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest Cells

Craniofacial anomalies are among the most common of birth defects. The pathogenesis of craniofacial anomalies frequently involves defects in the migration, proliferation, and fate of neural crest cells destined for the craniofacial skeleton. Genetic mutations causing deficient cranial neural crest migration and proliferation can result in Treacher Collins syndrome, Pierre Robin sequence, and cleft palate. Defects in post-migratory neural crest cells can result in pre- or post-ossification defects in the developing craniofacial skeleton and craniosynostosis (premature fusion of cranial bones/cranial sutures). The coronal suture is the most frequently fused suture in craniosynostosis syndromes. It exists as a biological boundary between the neural crest-derived frontal bone and paraxial mesoderm-derived parietal bone. The objective of this review is to frame our current understanding of neural crest cells in craniofacial development, craniofacial anomalies, and the pathogenesis of coronal craniosynostosis. We will also discuss novel approaches for advancing our knowledge and developing prevention and/or treatment strategies for craniofacial tissue regeneration and craniosynostosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document