Faculty Opinions recommendation of Experimental evolution of bet hedging.

Author(s):  
James Moir
2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Snigdhadip Dey ◽  
Steve Proulx ◽  
Henrique Teotonio

Most organisms live in ever-challenging temporally fluctuating environments. Theory suggests that the evolution of anticipatory (or deterministic) maternal effects underlies adaptation to environments that regularly fluctuate every other generation because of selection for increased offspring performance. Evolution of maternal bet-hedging reproductive strategies that randomize offspring phenotypes is in turn expected to underlie adaptation to irregularly fluctuating environments. Although maternal effects are ubiquitous their adaptive significance is unknown since they can easily evolve as a correlated response to selection for increased maternal performance. Using the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, we show the experimental evolution of maternal provisioning of offspring with glycogen, in populations facing a novel anoxia hatching environment every other generation. As expected with the evolution of deterministic maternal effects, improved embryo hatching survival under anoxia evolved at the expense of fecundity and glycogen provisioning when mothers experienced anoxia early in life. Unexpectedly, populations facing an irregularly fluctuating anoxia hatching environment failed to evolve maternal bet-hedging reproductive strategies. Instead, adaptation in these populations should have occurred through the evolution of balancing trade-offs over multiple generations, since they evolved reduced fitness over successive generations in anoxia but did not go extinct during experimental evolution. Mathematical modelling confirms our conclusion that adaptation to a wide range of patterns of environmental fluctuations hinges on the existence of deterministic maternal effects, and that they are generally much more likely to contribute to adaptation than maternal bet-hedging reproductive strategies.


Nature ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 462 (7269) ◽  
pp. 90-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hubertus J. E. Beaumont ◽  
Jenna Gallie ◽  
Christian Kost ◽  
Gayle C. Ferguson ◽  
Paul B. Rainey

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nick Vallespir Lowery ◽  
Luke McNally ◽  
William C. Ratcliff ◽  
Sam P. Brown

ABSTRACTBacterial cells, like many other organisms, face a tradeoff between longevity and fecundity. Planktonic cells are fast growing and fragile, while biofilm cells are often slower growing but stress resistant. Here we ask: why do bacterial lineages invest simultaneously in both fast and slow growing types? We develop a population dynamical model of lineage expansion across a patchy environment, and find that mixed investment is favored across a broad range of environmental conditions, even when transmission is entirely via biofilm cells. This mixed strategy is favored because of a division of labor, where exponentially dividing planktonic cells can act as an engine for the production of future biofilm cells, which grow more slowly. We use experimental evolution to test our predictions, and show that phenotypic heterogeneity is persistent even under selection for purely planktonic or purely biofilm transmission. Furthermore, simulations suggest that maintenance of a biofilm subpopulation serves as a cost-effective hedge against environmental uncertainty, which is also consistent with our experimental findings.


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shravan Raghu ◽  
Myron Smith ◽  
Andrew Simons

Abstract Environmental unpredictability results in the evolution of bet-hedging traits, which maximize long-term fitness but are, by definition, suboptimal over short time scales. However, because suboptimal traits are expected to be purged by selection in the shorter term, the persistence of bet hedging remains perplexing. Here, we test the hypothesis that bet hedging persists through the evolution of constraint on short-term adaptation. We experimentally evolve Saccharomyces cerevisiae across two sequential treatments in which the frequency of extreme heat shocks decreases. We predict that experimental evolution under lower frequency heat shocks will result in greater adaptive constraint, or “purge-resistant” bet hedging. Constraint is assayed as evolutionary persistence of heat shock tolerance (HST) under constant benign conditions. As predicted, we find the retention of HST only in lines evolved under reduced frequency detrimental conditions. Results help explain the evolution of bet hedging, and challenge the traditional view that evolutionary constraint is inherently maladaptive.


2014 ◽  
Vol 281 (1787) ◽  
pp. 20140706 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey K. Graham ◽  
Myron L. Smith ◽  
Andrew M. Simons

All organisms are faced with environmental uncertainty. Bet-hedging theory expects unpredictable selection to result in the evolution of traits that maximize the geometric-mean fitness even though such traits appear to be detrimental over the shorter term. Despite the centrality of fitness measures to evolutionary analysis, no direct test of the geometric-mean fitness principle exists. Here, we directly distinguish between predictions of competing fitness maximization principles by testing Cohen's 1966 classic bet-hedging model using the fungus Neurospora crassa . The simple prediction is that propagule dormancy will evolve in proportion to the frequency of ‘bad’ years, whereas the prediction of the alternative arithmetic-mean principle is the evolution of zero dormancy as long as the expectation of a bad year is less than 0.5. Ascospore dormancy fraction in N. crassa was allowed to evolve under five experimental selection regimes that differed in the frequency of unpredictable ‘bad years’. Results were consistent with bet-hedging theory: final dormancy fraction in 12 genetic lineages across 88 independently evolving samples was proportional to the frequency of bad years, and evolved both upwards and downwards as predicted from a range of starting dormancy fractions. These findings suggest that selection results in adaptation to variable rather than to expected environments.


Oikos ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 126 (8) ◽  
pp. 1162-1172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Tarazona ◽  
Eduardo M. García-Roger ◽  
María José Carmona

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document