Faculty Opinions recommendation of Effect of baseline breast density on breast cancer incidence, stage, mortality, and screening parameters: 25-year follow-up of a Swedish mammographic screening.

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Terry ◽  
Pamela Mink
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Density ◽  
Cancer Incidence ◽  
Breast Cancer Incidence ◽  
Mammographic Screening

scholarly journals Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy and Breast Cancer Risk Reduction in the Gynecologic Oncology Group Protocol-0199 (GOG-0199)

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Phuong L Mai ◽  
Austin Miller ◽  
Mitchell H Gail ◽  
Steven Skates ◽  
Karen Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Cancer Risk ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Cancer Incidence ◽  
Breast Cancer Incidence ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Pathogenic Variant ◽  
Risk Reducing ◽  
Cancer Risk Reduction

Abstract Background Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) has been associated with approximately 50% breast cancer risk reduction among women with a pathogenic variant in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2), a finding that has recently been questioned. Methods We estimated incidence rates of breast cancer and all cancers combined during 5 years of follow-up among participants selecting RRSO or ovarian cancer screening (OCS) among women with a BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant or strong breast and/or ovarian cancer family history. Ovarian or fallopian tube or peritoneal cancer incidence rates were estimated for the OCS group. Breast cancer hazard ratios (HRs) for time-dependent RRSO were estimated using Cox regression with age time-scale (4943 and 4990 women-years in RRSO and OCS cohorts, respectively). All statistical tests were two-sided. Results The RRSO cohort included 925 participants, and 1453 participants were in the OCS cohort (381 underwent RRSO during follow-up), with 88 incident breast cancers diagnosed. Among BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers, a non-statistically significant lower breast cancer incidence was observed in the RRSO compared with the OCS cohort (HR = 0.86, 95% confidence interval  = 0.45 to 1.67; P = .67). No difference was observed in the overall population or among subgroups stratified by prior breast cancer history or menopausal status. Seven fallopian tube and four ovarian cancers were prospectively diagnosed in the OCS cohort, and one primary peritoneal carcinoma occurred in the RRSO cohort. Conclusions These data suggest that RRSO might be associated with reduced breast cancer incidence among women with a BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant, although the effect, if present, is small. This evolving evidence warrants a thorough discussion regarding the impact of RRSO on breast cancer risk with women considering this intervention.

Is Mammographic Breast Density a Breast Cancer Risk Factor in Women With BRCA Mutations?

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (23) ◽  
pp. 3779-3783 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kavitha Passaperuma ◽  
Ellen Warner ◽  
Kimberley A. Hill ◽  
Anoma Gunasekara ◽  
Martin J. Yaffe
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Breast Cancer Risk ◽  
Breast Density ◽  
Cancer Incidence ◽  
Breast Cancer Incidence ◽  
Breast Cancer Risk Factor ◽  
Mammographic Breast Density ◽  
Cancer Risk Factor ◽  
Brca Mutations

Purpose Increased mammographic breast density is well recognized as a breast cancer risk factor in the general population. However, it is unclear whether it is a risk factor in women with BRCA mutations. We present the results of a nested case-control screening study investigating the relationship between breast density and breast cancer incidence in this population. Patients and Methods Women ages 25 to 65 years with known BRCA mutations were enrolled onto a single-center, high-risk breast cancer screening program. Using a computer-aided technique (Cumulus), quantitative percentage density (PD) was measured for each participant on her baseline mammogram by a single, blinded observer. Results Between November 1997 and March 2008, 462 women (mean age, 44 years; 245 BRCA1 and 217 BRCA2) were screened and 50 breast cancers were diagnosed (38 invasive, 12 ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS]). Density was not measured in 40 women of whom four developed cancer (three invasive, one DCIS). Mean PD (± standard deviation [SD]) for 376 women who did not develop breast cancer was 34% (23) compared with 31% (21) for 46 women with cancer (P = .51). Logistic regression model of breast cancer incidence and PD revealed an odds ratio of 0.99 (± 0.01 SD) for a one-unit increase in PD (P = .44). Results remained nonsignificant in multivariate analysis, as well as when women with pure DCIS were excluded. Conclusion Increased mammographic breast density is not associated with higher breast cancer incidence in women with BRCA mutations. On the basis of these findings, density should not be considered a factor for these women in decision making regarding prophylactic surgery or chemoprevention.

Physical activity and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer defined by hormone receptor status and histology: A large prospective cohort study with 18 years of follow up

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1002-1002 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Bardia ◽  
A. H. Wang ◽  
L. C. Hartmann ◽  
J. E. Olson ◽  
C. M. Vachon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Physical Activity ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Breast Cancer Risk ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Cancer Incidence ◽  
Breast Cancer Incidence ◽  
Histological Subtypes

1002 Background: Physical activity is a modifiable breast cancer risk factor, perhaps mediating risk reduction through regulation of estrogen metabolism. Evidence regarding effect of physical activity is conflicting partly because breast cancer is a heterogenous constellation of different tumor subtypes with differing etiologies. No prospective study has examined the relationship between physical activity and breast cancer incidence based on ER/PR status or histological subtype. Objective: Examine effect of physical activity on breast cancer incidence based on ER/PR status and histological subtypes of breast cancer. Methods: The Iowa Women’s Health Study is a prospective cohort study of postmenopausal women (N=41,837). Physical activity was self-reported on baseline questionnaire, and three levels (high, medium and low) were defined. Breast cancer incidence, histologic subtype and ER/PR status, through 18 years of follow-up, were ascertained by linkage with the Iowa SEER Cancer Registry. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate multivariate relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of breast cancer, adjusting for other breast cancer risk factors. Results: During 554,819 person-years of follow-up, 2548 incident cases of breast cancer were observed. High physical activity was associated with decreased risk for breast cancer (RR 0.91, 95 % CI 0.81–1.01) compared to low activity. The protective effect was most marked in ER+/PR− (RR 0.66, CI 0.46–0.94), intermediate in ER−/PR− (RR 0.80, CI 0.56–1.15), weakest in ER+/PR+ (RR 0.94, CI 0.81–1.08), and elevated in ER-/PR+ (RR 1.42, CI 0.67–3.01) tumors. Higher physical activity was also associated with a decreased risk of invasive ductal/lobular carcinoma (RR 0.90, CI 0.80–1.02), but not with invasive breast cancer with a favorable histology (RR 1.19, CI 0.78–1.81). Conclusions: Higher physical activity was associated with a 10% decreased risk of breast cancer. Unexpectedly, risk reduction was most marked in PR- tumors, particularly ER+/PR-, and the more aggressive histologic forms. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings, and also evaluate other risk factors based on ER/PR status and histological subtypes. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document