Faculty Opinions recommendation of Prognostic significance of deep vein thrombosis in patients presenting with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism.

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Tapson
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Deep Vein

Risk factors associated with symptomatic pulmonary embolism in a large cohort of deep vein thrombosis patients

2005 ◽  
Vol 93 (03) ◽  
pp. 494-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nils Kucher ◽  
Victor Tapson ◽  
Samuel Goldhaber ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Chronic Lung Disease ◽  
Thromboembolic Event ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
History Of ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Deep Vein

SummaryIn patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT), the factors which predispose to concomitant symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) have remained uncertain. From a prospective cohort of 5,451 consecutive patients with ultrasound-confirmed DVT, we analyzed 4,211 patients with a known status for presence (n =639) or absence (n = 3572) of symptomatic PE. Age and gender were similar in DVT plus PE (63.7±15.6 years; 49% men) and DVT patients (63.4±17.3 years; 46% men). Body mass index (BMI) was higher in patients with DVT plus PE (median 29.0, range 15.4–67.0 kg/m2) than in patients with DVT (median 26.8, range 9.7–64.4 kg/m2; p < 0.001). Chronic lung disease (17% vs. 12%; p < 0.001), a personal history of PE (11% vs. 6%; p < 0.001), and a family history of DVT or PE (8% vs. 4%; p < 0.001) were more frequent in DVT plus PE patients. Twenty-seven percent of DVT plus PE patients received prophylaxis prior to the thromboembolic event compared with 32% of DVT patients (p=0.002). Proximal DVT (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.39–2.43), prior PE (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.20–2.35), obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m2) (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.33–2.04), chronic lung disease (OR 1.51, 95%CI 1.13–2.01), as well as omission of prophylaxis (OR 1.30, 95%CI 1.04–1.64) emerged as independent predictors of concomitant symptomatic PE.

scholarly journals Increased deep vein thrombosis cases during the COVID-19 quarantine

2020 ◽  
pp. 026835552097729
Author(s):  
Evren Karaali ◽  
Osman Çiloğlu ◽  
Orhan Saim Demirtürk ◽  
Burak Keklikçioğlu ◽  
İsmail Akçay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Previous History ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Prophylactic Drug ◽  
History Of ◽  
Deep Vein

Objective The aim of this study was to compare the number of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) cases during the quarantine period for COVID-19 to that of the last year. Methods This study was conducted as a single-center and retrospective study. All hospital admissions during April 2020 and May 2020 were screened from the hospital records, and DVT cases were recorded. Likewise, all hospital admissions during April 2019 and May 2019 were screened, and DVT cases were noted. DVT cases of both years were compared. Results Among 480931 patients admitted to our hospital in April 2019 and May 2019, DVT was detected in 82 patients (0.017%) (47 males, 35 females) with a mean age of 56.99 ± 9.1 years (ranges 39 to 79 years). Besides, among 145101 patients admitted to our hospital in April 2020 and May 2020, DVT was detected in 123 patients (0.084%) (51 males, 72 females) with a mean age of 58.64 ± 8.9 years (ranges 40 to 83 years). Despite the decrease in the total number of patients admitted to the hospital, there was a significant increase in the number of DVT patients. Interestingly, there were only two symptomatic pulmonary-embolism cases in the 2019 period, whereas there were seven symptomatic pulmonary embolisms secondary to DVT in the 2020 period. Unfortunately, one patient died due to pulmonary embolism secondary to DVT in 2020. The previous history of DVT was remarkable in patients admitted during the COVID-19 confinement. Conclusion In conclusion, COVID-19 confinement seems to be associated with increased rates of DVT. Strict preventive measures such as exercise training or prophylactic drug use should be considered to prevent immobility-related DVT during the COVID-19 quarantine.

scholarly journals Prognostic Significance of Incidental Deep Vein Thrombosis in Patients with Cancer Presenting with Incidental Pulmonary Embolism

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 2267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Barca-Hernando ◽  
Rocio Ortega-Rivera ◽  
Sergio Lopez-Ruz ◽  
Teresa Elias-Hernandez ◽  
Maria Isabel Asensio-Cruz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Multivariate Regression Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Effect ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Incidental Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Deep Vein

In symptomatic acute pulmonary embolism (PE), the presence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a risk factor for 30- and 90-day mortality. In patients with cancer and incidental PE, the prognostic effect of concomitant incidental DVT is unknown. In this retrospective study, we examined the effect of incidental DVT on all-cause mortality in such patients. Adjusted Cox multivariate regression analysis was used for relevant covariates. From January 2010 to March 2018, we included 200 patients (mean age, 65.3 ± 12.4 years) who were followed up for 12.5 months (interquartile range 7.4–19.4 months). Of these patients, 62% had metastases, 31% had concomitant incidental DVT, and 40.1% (n = 81) died during follow-up. All-cause mortality did not increase in patients with DVT (hazard ratio [HR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43–2.75, p = 0.855). On multivariate analysis, weight (adjusted HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.92–0.99, p = 0.032), and metastasis (adjusted HR 10.26, 95% CI 2.35–44.9, p = 0.002) were predictors of all-cause mortality. In conclusion, low weight and presence of metastases were associated with all-cause mortality, while presence of concomitant DVT was unrelated to poorer survival.

scholarly journals Pulmonary Embolism and Coexisting Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Detrimental Association?

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 899 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena-Mihaela Cordeanu ◽  
Hélène Lambach ◽  
Marie Heitz ◽  
Julie Di Cesare ◽  
Corina Mirea ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
The Impact

Background: The prognostic significance of coexisting deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is controversial. This study aimed to provide routine patient care data on the impact of this association on PE severity and 3-month outcomes in a population presenting with symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) from the REMOTEV registry. Methods and Results: REMOTEV is a prospective, non-interventional study of patients with acute symptomatic VTE, treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or standard anticoagulation (vitamin K antagonists (VKA) or parenteral heparin/fondaparinux alone) for at least 3 months. From 1 November 2013 to 28 February 2018, among 1241 consecutive patients included, 1192 had a follow-up of at least 3 months and, among them, 1037 had PE with (727) or without DVT (310). The median age was 69 (55–80, 25th–75th percentiles). Patients with PE-associated DVT had more severe forms of PE (p < 0.0001) and, when DVT was present, proximal location was significantly correlated to PE severity (p < 0.01). However, no difference in all-cause mortality rate (hazard ratio (HR) 1.36 (CI 95% 0.69–2.92)), nor in the composite criterion of all-cause mortality and recurrence rate (HR 1.56 (CI 95% 0.83–3.10)) was noted at 3 months of follow-up. Conclusion: In REMOTEV, coexisting DVT was associated with a higher severity of PE, with no impact on short-term prognosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document