Faculty Opinions recommendation of Kinetic markers of human embryo quality using time-lapse recordings of IVF/ICSI-fertilized oocytes.

Author(s):  
Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz ◽  
Anna Ajduk
2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 557-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Feyeux ◽  
A Reignier ◽  
M Mocaer ◽  
J Lammers ◽  
D Meistermann ◽  
...  

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Is it possible to develop an automated annotation tool for human embryo development in time-lapse devices based on image analysis? SUMMARY ANSWER We developed and validated an automated software for the annotation of human embryo morphokinetic parameters, having a good concordance with expert manual annotation on 701 time-lapse videos. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Morphokinetic parameters obtained with time-lapse devices are increasingly used for the assessment of human embryo quality. However, their annotation is time-consuming and can be slightly operator-dependent, highlighting the need to develop fully automated approaches. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This monocentric study was conducted on 701 videos originating from 584 couples undergoing IVF with embryo culture in a time-lapse device. The only selection criterion was that the duration of the video must be over 60 h. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS An automated morphokinetic annotation tool was developed based on gray level coefficient of variation and detection of the thickness of the zona pellucida. The detection of cellular events obtained with the automated tool was compared with those obtained manually by trained experts in clinical settings. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Although some differences were found when embryos were considered individually, we found an overall concordance between automated and manual annotation of human embryo morphokinetics from fertilization to expanded blastocyst stage (r2 = 0.92). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION These results should undergo multicentric external evaluation in order to test the overall performance of the annotation tool. Getting access to the export of 3D videos would enhance the quality of the correlation with the same algorithm and its extension to the 3D regions of interest. A technical limitation of our work lies within the duration of the video. The more embryo stages the video contains, the more information the script has to identify them correctly. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Our system paves the way for high-throughput analysis of multicentric morphokinetic databases, providing new insights into the clinical value of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo quality and implantation. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This study was partly funded by Finox-Gedeon Richter Forward Grant 2016 and NeXT (ANR-16-IDEX-0007). We have no conflict of interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Feyeux ◽  
A Reignier ◽  
M Mocaer ◽  
J Lammers ◽  
D Meistermann ◽  
...  

AbstractStudy QuestionIs it possible to automatically annotate human embryo development in time-lapse devices, with results comparable to manual annotation?Summary AnswerWe developed an automated tool for the annotation of embryo morphokinetic parameters having a high concordance with expert manual annotation in a large scale-study.What is Known AlreadyMorphokinetic parameters obtained with time-lapse devices are increasingly used for human embryo quality assessment. However, their annotation is timeconsuming and can be operator-dependent, highlighting the need of developing automated approaches.Study Design, Size, DurationThis monocentric pilot study was conducted using 701 blastocysts originating from 584 couples undergoing IVF with embryo culture in a time-lapse device and on 4 mouse embryos.Participants/Materials, Setting, MethodsAn automated annotation tool was developed based on grey level coefficient of variation and detection of the thickness of the zona pellucida. The timings of cellular events obtained with the automated tool were compared with those obtained manually by 2 expert embryologists. The same procedure was applied on 4 mouse preimplantation embryos obtained with a different device in a different setting.Main Results and the Role of ChanceAlthough some differences were found when embryos were considered individually, we found an overall excellent concordance between automated and manual annotation of human embryo morphokinetics from fertilization to expanded blastocyst stage (r2=0.94). Moreover, the automated annotation tool gave promising results across species (human, mice).Limitations, Reasons for CautionThese results should undergo multi-centric external evaluation in order to test the overall performance of the annotation tool.Wider Implications of the FindingsOur system performs significantly better than the ones reported in the literature and on a bigger cohort, paving the way for high-throughput analysis of multicentric morphokinetic databases, providing new insights into the clinical value of morphokinetics as predictor of embryo quality and implantation.Study Funding/Competing Interest(s)This study was partly funded by Finox Forward Grant 2016.Trial Registration NumberNA


Animals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 748
Author(s):  
Joanna Kochan ◽  
Agnieszka Nowak ◽  
Barbara Kij ◽  
Sylwia Prochowska ◽  
Wojciech Niżański

The aim of this study was to analyze the morphokinetic parameters of feline embryos using a time lapse system. Oocytes matured in vitro were fertilized (IVF) and in vitro cultured in a time lapse-system (Primo Vision®, Gothenburg, Sweden). The first cell division of embryos occurred between 17 h post insemination (hpi) and 38 hpi, with the highest proportion of embryos (46%) cleaving between 21 and 24 hpi. The timing of the first cleavage significantly affected further embryo development, with the highest development occurring in embryos that cleaved at 21–22 hpi. Embryos that cleaved very early (17–18 hpi) developed poorly to the blastocyst stage (2%) and none of the embryos that cleaved later than 27 hpi were able to reach the blastocyst stage. Morphological defects were observed in 48% of the embryos. There were no statistically significant differences between the timing intervals of the first cleavage division and the frequency of morphological defects in embryos. Multiple (MUL) morphological defects were detected in more than half (56%) of the abnormal embryos. The most frequent single morphological defects were cytoplasmic fragmentation (FR) (8%) and blastomere asymmetry (AS) (6%). Direct cleavage (DC) from 1–3 or 3–5 blastomeres, reverse cleavage (RC) and vacuoles were rarely observed (2–3%). The timing of blastocyst cavity formation is a very good indicator of embryo quality. In our study, blastocyst cavity formation occurred between 127–167 hpi, with the highest frequency of hatching observed in blastocysts that cavitated between 142–150 hpi. Blastocysts in which cavitation began after 161 h did not hatch. In conclusion, the timing of the first and second cleavage divisions, the timing of blastocyst cavity formation and morphological anomalies can all be used as early and non-invasive indicators of cat embryo development in vitro.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qina He ◽  
Guidong Yao ◽  
Jiahuan He ◽  
Guang Yang ◽  
Ziwen Xu ◽  
...  

Abstract At present, embryo morphology assessment based on the observation of the embryonic morphological characteristics at several specific time points has been mainly used for selecting the high-quality embryo. However, we all know that embryo development is a dynamic process. Many research results on the correlation between the embryo morphokinetic parameters and embryo quality and development potential were inconsistent. With the help of time-lapse imaging, the development processes and outcomes of a total of 365 embryos were cultured and analyzed in this study. The results showed that the mean tPNf and t2 of the high-quality embryo were significantly shorter than the low-quality embryo; the mean t2PBe and tPNa of the high-quality embryo from the implantation group were significantly shorter than those from the non-implantation group. In addition, based on the quartile grouping of each morphokinetic parameter, the embryos that had 21.15≤tPNf≤25.30 value were significantly higher in embryo quality when compared with the embryos that had the tPNf values outside the range on Days 3. Similarly, the embryos that had values of t2≤25.60 were significantly higher in embryo quality than those with outside the range values on Days 3. Thus, we demonstrated that the morphokinetic parameter evaluated using a time-lapse embryo monitoring system can predict the embryo quality, and be benefit for the selection of the high-quality embryos and improvement for the implantation success of the patient in assisted reproductive technologies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J M M Hall ◽  
M A Dakka ◽  
D Perugini ◽  
S Diakiw ◽  
T Nguyen ◽  
...  

Abstract Study question Does embryo quality/viability change over time, suggesting the use of video for AI-based embryo quality assessment has limited benefit over single point-in-time images? Summary answer AI assessment of single static embryo images at multiple time-points indicates embryo viability is dynamic, and past viability is a limited predictor of future pregnancy. What is known already Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been applied to the problem of embryo quality (viability) assessment using either video or single static images. However, whether historical data within video provide an additional advantage over single static images of embryos (at the time of transfer) for assessing embryo viability is not known. This applies to both manual and AI-based embryo assessment. If embryo viability changes over time prior to transfer, then the implication is that the assessment of future pregnancy using historical embryo data from videos would provide limited additional value over single static images taken immediately prior to transfer. Study design, size, duration Retrospective dataset of single embryo images taken at up-to three time-points prior to transfer: Early Day 5, Late Day 5 (8 hours later), and Early Day 6 (16 hours later), with corresponding fetal heartbeat (pregnancy) outcomes. The AI assessed the viability of each embryo at its available timepoints. Viability prediction was compared with pregnancy outcome to assess viability predictiveness at each timepoint prior to transfer, and assess the variability of viability over time. Participants/materials, setting, methods Single static images of 173 embryos were taken using time-lapse incubators from a single IVF clinic. 116 embryos were viable (led to a pregnancy) and 57 were non-viable (did not lead to a pregnancy). The AI was trained on thousands of Day 5 static embryo images taken from multiple IVF laboratories and countries, but was not trained on data from this clinic. Main results and the role of chance When embryos were assessed as viable by the AI immediately prior to transfer (no delay), the AI accuracy (sensitivity) in predicting pregnancy was 88.1% (59/67) for Early Day 5, 84.8% (28/33) for Late Day 5 and 87.5% (14/16) for Early Day 6. When the delay between AI assessment and transfer is 8 hours, 16 hours and 24 hours, the the accuracy drops to 66.7% (22/33), 31.3% (5/16) and 12.5% (2/16), respectively. These results indicate that the viability of the embryo is dynamic, and therefore time series analysis, i.e. using video, may not be well suited for embryo viability assessment because past viability is not necessarily a good predictor of future viability or pregnancy outcome. The viability of the embryo immediately prior to transfer, from a single static image, is a reliable predictor of viability. This is consistent with the current clinical practice of using Gardner score end-point assessment for embryo quality. Results also suggest significant benefits from using time-lapse with AI, where AI continually assesses embryo viability over time using static images. The time point at which the embryo should be transferred to maximize pregnancy outcome is when the embryo has the greatest AI viability score. Limitations, reasons for caution Although evidence suggests past embryo viability is a limited predictor of future pregnancy, a side-by-side comparison of video versus single static image AI assessment would further verify that the historical or change in embryo development or viability has minimal impact on embryo viability assessment at the time prior to transfer. Wider implications of the findings: Time-lapse and AI can beneficially change the way embryos are assessed. Continual AI monitoring of embryos enables optimization of which embryo to transfer and when, to ultimately improve pregnancy outcomes for patients. The findings also suggest that static end-point AI assessment is sufficient for predicting embryo implantation potential. Trial registration number Not applicable


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document