Abstract
Background: To decrease the proportion of women in fragile or conflict-affected situations (FCS) that need, but are not using modern contraception, the global health community must better understand family planning (FP) knowledge gaps; and elucidate which subgroups of women are, and are not, effectively being reached with FP information. This study investigated whether women with notable sexual and reproductive health histories that put them at risk for future pregnancy complications, namely HIV+ women and women with history of terminated pregnancy (HTP), would possess more complete FP knowledge and/or recall being given FP information more readily than HIV- women and women with no HTP (NHTP), respectively. Methods: Knowledge of several contraceptive methods, and the prevalence of women who recalled being given FP information at a healthcare visit, or via TV, radio, or periodical were estimated across HIV, HTP, and country subgroups. HIV+ and HTP status were major predictors in multivariate logistic regressions analyzing the odds of knowing a specified method of contraception or of recalling being given FP information via the modes considered. Results: HIV+ as opposed to HIV- women showed significantly higher odds of knowing about the pill (p=0.001), IUD (p<0.001), injectables (p=0.005), male condoms (p<0.001), female condoms (p<0.001), and implants (p<0.001); but not female or male sterilization. HIV+ women demonstrated higher odds of recalling being given FP information at a health visit (p=0.001), whereas HTP women did not. HTP women showed higher odds (p<0.001) of knowing each modern method of FP with the exception of male sterilization and of recalling TV (p=0.01) and radio (p<0.001) FP messages. Conclusions: Notable findings were the higher FP awareness among HIV+ and HTP women, and the observation that HIV+ women were seemingly provided FP information more readily at healthcare visits than were HTP women, despite their similar risk profiles concerning future pregnancies. Subsequent studies may elucidate why these patterns were observed and indicate which other diagnostic groups are effectively being reached with FP education, and which are not. Understanding trends and predictors of FP knowledge can help practitioners better target FP counseling efforts in FCS toward knowledge gaps and their causes.