Faculty Opinions recommendation of Treatment of ocular rosacea with once-daily low-dose doxycycline.

Author(s):  
Uwe Wollina
Keyword(s):  
Low Dose ◽  
Cornea ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 257-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bianka Sobolewska ◽  
Deshka Doycheva ◽  
Christoph Deuter ◽  
Ines Pfeffer ◽  
Martin Schaller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Dose ◽  

Author(s):  
Ab Rahman A F ◽  
Md Sahak N. ◽  
Ali A. M.

Objective: Once daily dosing (ODD) aminoglycoside is gaining wide acceptance as an alternative way of dosing. In our setting it is the regimen of choice whenever gentamicin is indicated. The objective of this study was to evaluate the practice of gentamicin ODD in a public hospital in Malaysia. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of medical records of patients on gentamicin ODD who were admitted to Hospital Melaka during January 2002 until March 2010. All adult patients who were on ODD gentamicin with various level of renal function were included in the study. Patients on gentamicin less than 72 hours and pregnant women were excluded. Results: From 110 patients, 75 (68.2%) were male and 35 (31.8%) were female. Indications for ODD gentamicin included pneumonia, 34 (31.0%) neutropenic sepsis, 27 (24.5%) and sepsis, 11 (10.0%). The mean dose and duration of gentamicin was 3.2 mg/kg/day and 7 days, respectively. Almost all patients were on gentamicin combined with other antibiotics. Clinical cure based on fever resolution was found in 89.1% of patients treated with ODD. Resolution of fever took an average of 48 hours after initiation of therapy. The evaluation for bacteriologic cure could not be performed because of insufficient data on culture and sensitivity. Out of 38 patients with analyzable serum creatinine data, four patients might have developed nephrotoxicity. Conclusion: In our setting, lower dosages of ODD gentamicin when used in combination with other antibiotics seemed to be effective and safe in treating most gram negative infections.


Heart ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. heartjnl-2020-318758
Author(s):  
Gilles R Dagenais ◽  
Leanne Dyal ◽  
Jacqueline J Bosch ◽  
Darryl P Leong ◽  
Victor Aboyans ◽  
...  

ObjectiveIn patients with chronic coronary or peripheral artery disease enrolled in the Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies trial, randomised antithrombotic treatments were stopped after a median follow-up of 23 months because of benefits of the combination of rivaroxaban 2.5 mg two times per day and aspirin 100 mg once daily compared with aspirin 100 mg once daily. We assessed the effect of switching to non-study aspirin at the time of early stopping.MethodsIncident composite of myocardial infarction, stroke or cardiovascular death was estimated per 100 person-years (py) during randomised treatment (n=18 278) and after study treatment discontinuation to non-study aspirin (n=14 068).ResultsDuring randomised treatment, the combination compared with aspirin reduced the composite (2.2 vs 2.9/100 py, HR: 0.76, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.86), stroke (0.5 vs 0.8/100 py, HR: 0.58, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.76) and cardiovascular death (0.9 vs 1.2/100 py, HR: 0.78, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.96). During 1.02 years after early stopping, participants originally randomised to the combination compared with those randomised to aspirin had similar rates of the composite (2.1 vs 2.0/100 py, HR: 1.08, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.39) and cardiovascular death (1.0 vs 0.8/100 py, HR: 1.26, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.86) but higher stroke rate (0.7 vs 0.4/100 py, HR: 1.74, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.87) including a significant increase in ischaemic stroke during the first 6 months after switching to non-study aspirin.ConclusionDiscontinuing study rivaroxaban and aspirin to non-study aspirin was associated with the loss of cardiovascular benefits and a stroke excess.Trial registration numberNCT01776424.


2007 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer R. King ◽  
Thomas N. Kakuda ◽  
Sunita Paul ◽  
Man Ming Tse ◽  
Edward P. Acosta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Dose ◽  

1987 ◽  

The efficacy and safety of a low molecular weight heparin (Kabi 2165) in preventing postoperative deep vein thrombosis (D.V.T.), was assessed in a double blind randomly allocated multicenter trial. 385 patients were included and analysed on a intention to treat basis. Kabi 2165 was given S.C. 24 hourly in 2 500 anti-factor Xa units and compared with standard low dose calcium heparin 5 000 i.u. S.C. 12 hourly in patients undergoing major abdominal or gynaecological surgery. The first dose was administered two hours before operation in both groups. The relevant characteristics of the patients in the two treatment groups were similar. The two groups were well matched for risk factors which could predispose to D.V.T.DVT was detected by the radioactive fibrinogen test. Venography was performed whenever a positive scan developed in a patient. Six (3,1 96) of 195 patients receiving Kabi 2165 and seven (3,7 96) of 190 patients in the standard heparin group developed D.V.T. No pulmonary embolism we re detected during the prophylactic regimens. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of blood loss during surgery, postoperative drainage, blood transfusion, wound haematoma. Mean hemoglobin levels and mean hematocrit values preoperatively and postoperatively (day 1 and 6) were :There were no statistically significant differences in both groups. No thrombocytopenia was reported in this study. The antifactor Xa activity was significantly higher in the Kabi 2165 group.In conclusion, Kabi 2165 once daily is as effective and safe as standard heparin twice daily in preventing postoperative D.V.T. in general surgery.


1991 ◽  
Vol 4 (2_Pt_2) ◽  
pp. 163S-167S ◽  
Author(s):  
W. L Diemont ◽  
C. J. Stegeman ◽  
J. Beekman ◽  
A. M. J. Siegers ◽  
G. Hagels ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 629-634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takuyuki KATABAMI ◽  
Hiroyuki KATO ◽  
Naoko SHIRAI ◽  
Satoru NAITO ◽  
Nobuhiko SAITO

2015 ◽  
Vol 114 (09) ◽  
pp. 645-650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rupert Bauersachs ◽  
Jan Beyer-Westendorf ◽  
Henri Bounameaux ◽  
Timothy Brighton ◽  
Alexander Cohen ◽  
...  

SummaryPatients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) are at high risk for recurrence. Although rivaroxaban is effective for extended VTE treatment at a dose of 20 mg once daily, use of the 10 mg dose may further improve its benefit-to-risk ratio. Low-dose aspirin also reduces rates of recurrent VTE, but has not been compared with anticoagulant therapy. The EINSTEIN CHOICE study is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, event-driven study comparing the efficacy and safety of two once daily doses of rivaroxaban (20 and 10 mg) with aspirin (100 mg daily) for the prevention of recurrent VTE in patients who completed 6–12 months of anticoagulant therapy for their index acute VTE event. All treatments will be given for 12 months. The primary efficacy objective is to determine whether both doses of rivaroxaban are superior to aspirin for the prevention of symptomatic recurrent VTE, while the principal safety outcome is the incidence of major bleeding. The trial is anticipated to enrol 2,850 patients from 230 sites in 31 countries over a period of 27 months. In conclusion, the EINSTEIN CHOICE study will provide new insights into the optimal antithrombotic strategy for extended VTE treatment by comparing two doses of rivaroxaban with aspirin (clinicaltrials.gov NCT02064439).


2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 965-976 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Havrdova ◽  
R Zivadinov ◽  
J Krasensky ◽  
MG Dwyer ◽  
I Novakova ◽  
...  

Background Studies evaluating interferon beta (IFNβ) for multiple sclerosis (MS) showed only partial efficacy. In many patients, IFNβ does not halt relapses or disability progression. One strategy to potentially enhance efficacy is to combine IFNβ with classical immunosuppressive agents, such as azathioprine (AZA) or corticosteroids, commonly used for other autoimmune disorders. Objective The Avonex–Steroids–Azathioprine study was placebo-controlled trial and evaluated efficacy of IFNβ-1a alone and combined with low-dose AZA alone or low-dose AZA and low-dose corticosteroids as initial therapy. Methods A total of 181 patients with relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS) were randomized to receive IFNβ-1a 30 μg intramuscularly (IM) once weekly, IFNβ-1a 30 μg IM once weekly plus AZA 50 mg orally once daily, or IFNβ-1a 30 μg IM once weekly plus AZA 50 mg orally once daily plus prednisone 10 mg orally every other day. The primary end point was annualized relapse rate (ARR) at 2 years. Patients were eligible for enrollment in a 3-year extension. Results At 2 years, adjusted ARR was 1.05 for IFNβ-1a, 0.91 for IFNβ-1a plus AZA, and 0.73 for combination. The cumulative probability of sustained disability progression was 16.8% for IFNβ-1a, 20.7% for IFNβ-1a plus AZA, and 17.5% for combination. There were no statistically significant differences among groups for either measure at 2 and 5 years. Percent T2 lesion volume change at 2 years was significantly lower for combination (+14.5%) versus IFNβ-1a alone (+30.3%, P < 0.05). Groups had similar safety profiles. Conclusion In IFNβ-naïve patients with early active RRMS, combination treatment did not show superiority over IFNβ-1a monotherapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document