Faculty Opinions recommendation of Reduced myocardial flow reserve is associated with diastolic dysfunction and decreased left atrial strain in patients with normal ejection fraction and epicardial perfusion.

Author(s):  
Gad Cotter ◽  
Olga Milo
2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Garcia-Izquierdo Jaen ◽  
S Mingo Santos ◽  
M Torres Sanabria ◽  
V Monivas Palomero ◽  
S Moreno Casado ◽  
...  

Abstract Background/Introduction Previous studies using conventional echocardiographic measurements have reported subclinical left diastolic dysfunction in patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS). Left atrial strain (LAS) has been shown to be an accurate predictor of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. However, there is no evidence regarding the use of LAS in MFS. Purpose To assess feasibility of LAS and compare LAS derived measurements along with traditional diastolic parameters in MFS patients vs healthy controls. Methods 46 MFS patients (normal LV ejection fraction, no previous cardiovascular surgery, no significant valvular regurgitation) vs. 20 healthy controls (age and sex-matched). We performed LAS analysis using 2D speckle-tracking (QLAB 10, Philips). LA strain was determined as the average value of the longitudinal deformation (7 segments) in the apical 4-chamber view (RR gating). Results LAS analysis was feasible in 40 MFS patients (87%). All participants had normal diastolic function according to current guidelines (ASE/EACVI 2016). MFS patients showed lower TDI e' velocities and higher average E/e' ratio, but still within normal range. Similarly, LVEF was normal but slightly reduced in MFS patients. LA strain and strain rate parameters during reservoir and conduit phase were significantly impaired in MFS patients compared to controls. MFS vs controls MFS patients (n=40) Controls (n=20) p MFS patients (n=40) Controls (n=20) p Age 33.8±12.4 34.4±8.3 0.846 Septal e' (cm/s) 9.7±2.5 11.7±2.3 0.006 Male (%) 24 (60%) 12 (60%) 1.000 Average E/e' ratio 6.8±1.5 5.5±1.1 0.002 SBP (mmHg) 120.3±12.4 120.1±9.4 0.969 TR velocity (cm/s) 208.6±21.4 201.6±22.9 0.390 DBP (mmHg) 72.0±10.1 67.1±6.2 0.069 LAVi (ml/m2) 23.5±7.1 25.5±4.8 0.260 Aortic root (mm) 40.3±4.6 31.7±3.7 <0.001 LASr (%) 32.6±8.8 43.0±8.3 <0.001 LVEF (%) 60.9±5.6 64.2±4.2 0.022 LAScd (%) −20.1±8.0 −29.4±5.5 <0.001 E-wave (cm/s) 74.6±16.5 76.7±16.5 0.651 LASct (%) −12.8±6.1 −13.6±5.2 0.622 A-wave (cm/s) 55.2±10.9 52.0±12.8 0.327 LASRr 2.02±0.49 2.31±0.43 0.030 E/A ratio 1.4±0.4 1.5±0.4 0.287 LASRcd −2.22±0.61 −3.07±0.68 <0.001 Lateral e' (cm/s) 13.0±3.6 16.3±3.3 0.002 LASRct −2.24±0.90 −2.35±0.75 0.600 SBP: Systolic blood pressure. DBP: Diastolic blood pressure. LVEF: Left ventricular ejection fraction. LAVi: Left atrial volume index. LAS: Left atrial strain. LASR: Left atrial strain rate. (r): Reservoir. (cd): Conduit. (ct): Contraction. Example of LA strain and strain rate Conclusion MFS patients showed a subtle impairment in diastolic function compared to controls. Although further evidence is needed, LAS derived parameters could be early markers of diastolic dysfunction in this group of patients. Acknowledgement/Funding Programa de Actividades de I+D de la Comunidad de Madrid


Author(s):  
Alessandro Malagoli ◽  
Luca Rossi ◽  
Alessia Zanni ◽  
Concetta Sticozzi ◽  
Massimo Francesco Piepoli ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 2316-2326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth L. Potter ◽  
Satish Ramkumar ◽  
Hiroshi Kawakami ◽  
Hong Yang ◽  
Leah Wright ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document