scholarly journals Faculty Opinions recommendation of The Interaction between Laminin-332 and α3β1 Integrin Determines Differentiation and Maintenance of CAFs, and Supports Invasion of Pancreatic Duct Adenocarcinoma Cells.

Author(s):  
C Michael DiPersio
Cancers ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana C. Martins Cavaco ◽  
Maryam Rezaei ◽  
Michele F. Caliandro ◽  
Augusto Martins Lima ◽  
Martin Stehling ◽  
...  

Ranking among the most lethal tumour entities, pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma cells invade neighbouring tissue resulting in high incidence of metastasis. They are supported by tumour stroma fibroblasts which have undergone differentiation into cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). Stiffness of cell substratum, cytokines, such as transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), and stromal matrix proteins, such as laminin-332, are factors which promote CAF differentiation. In a spheroid culture system, differentiation of CAFs was analysed for laminin-332 production, laminin-binding integrin repertoire, adhesion and migration behaviour, and, in heterospheroids, for their interplay with the pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma AsPC-I cells. Our data reveal that CAFs produce laminin-332 thus contributing to its ectopic deposition within the tumour stroma. Moreover, CAF differentiation correlates with an increased expression of α3β1 integrin, the principal laminin-332-receptor. Beyond its role as novel CAF marker protein, integrin α3β1 crucially determines differentiation and maintenance of the CAF phenotype, as knock-out of the integrin α3 subunit reversed the CAF differentiated state. AsPC-I cells co-cultured in heterospheroids with integrin α3-deficient CAFs invaded less than from heterospheroids with wild-type CAFs. This study highlights the role of integrin α3β1 integrin-laminin-332 interaction of CAFs which promotes and sustains differentiation of CAFs and promotes carcinoma invasion.


2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 174-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuai Liang ◽  
Xuejun Gong ◽  
Gewen Zhang ◽  
Gengwen Huang ◽  
Yebin Lu ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 132 (24) ◽  
pp. 3012-3014
Author(s):  
Xue-Song Zhao ◽  
Jing Zhou ◽  
Lei Dong ◽  
Hui Zhang ◽  
Ying-Jiang Ye

2013 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 731-740 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina Kligys ◽  
Yvonne Wu ◽  
Kevin J. Hamill ◽  
Katherine T. Lewandowski ◽  
Susan B. Hopkinson ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 2707-2715 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z.Z. Cai ◽  
L.B. Xu ◽  
J.L. Cai ◽  
J.S. Wang ◽  
B. Zhou ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 3683-3691
Author(s):  
Yanwu Lu ◽  
Yiqun Zhou ◽  
Yi Cao ◽  
Zheng Shi ◽  
Qinghai Meng

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingbo Feng ◽  
Wenwei Liao ◽  
Zechang Xin ◽  
Hongyu Jin ◽  
Jinpeng Du ◽  
...  

BackgroundTo compare perioperative and oncological outcomes of pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD vs. OPD), we performed a meta-analysis of currently available propensity score matching studies and large-scale retrospective cohorts to compare the safety and overall effect of LPD to OPD for patients with PDAC.MethodsA meta-analysis was registered at PROSPERO and the registration number is CRD42021250395. PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched based on a defined search strategy to identify eligible studies before March 2021. Data on operative times, blood loss, 30-day mortality, reoperation, length of hospital stay (LOS), overall morbidity, Clavien–Dindo ≥3 complications, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), blood transfusion, delayed gastric emptying (DGE), postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH), and oncologic outcomes (R0 resection, lymph node dissection, overall survival, and long-term survival) were subjected to meta-analysis.ResultsOverall, we identified 10 retrospective studies enrolling a total of 11,535 patients (1,514 and 10,021 patients underwent LPD and OPD, respectively). The present meta-analysis showed that there were no significant differences in overall survival time, 1-year survival, 2-year survival, 30-day mortality, Clavien-Dindo ≥3 complications, POPF, DGE, PPH, and lymph node dissection between the LPD and OPD groups. Nevertheless, compared with the OPD group, LPD resulted in significantly higher rate of R0 resection (OR: 1.22; 95% CI 1.06–1.40; p = 0.005), longer operative time (WMD: 60.01 min; 95% CI 23.23–96.79; p = 0.001), lower Clavien–Dindo grade ≥III rate (p = 0.02), less blood loss (WMD: −96.49 ml; 95% CI −165.14 to −27.83; p = 0.006), lower overall morbidity rate (OR: 0.65; 95% CI 0.50 to 0.85; p = 0.002), shorter LOS (MD = −2.73; 95% CI −4.44 to −1.03; p = 0.002), higher 4-year survival time (p = 0.04), 5-year survival time (p = 0.001), and earlier time to starting adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery (OR: −10.86; 95% CI −19.42 to −2.30; p = 0.01).ConclusionsLPD is a safe and feasible alternative to OPD for patients with PDAC, and compared with OPD, LPD seemed to provide a similar OS.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document