scholarly journals Faculty Opinions recommendation of GPCR activation mechanisms across classes and macro/microscales.

Author(s):  
Christopher Southan
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Gloriam ◽  
Alexander Hauser ◽  
Albert Kooistra ◽  
Christian Munk ◽  
M. Madan Babu

Abstract Two-thirds of human hormones and one-third of clinical drugs activate ~350 G protein-coupled receptors belonging to four classes: A, B1, C and F. Whereas a model of activation has been described for class A, very little is known about the activation of the other classes which differ by being activated by endogenous ligands bound mainly or entirely extracellularly. Here, we show that although they use the same structural scaffold and share several helix macroswitches, the GPCR classes differ in their microswitch residue positions and contacts. We present molecular mechanistic maps of activation for each GPCR class and new methods for contact analysis applicable for any functional determinants. This is the first superfamily residue-level rationale for conformational selection and allosteric communication by ligands and G proteins laying the foundation for receptor-function studies and drugs with the desired modality.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Berkay Selçuk ◽  
Ismail Erol ◽  
Serdar Durdağı ◽  
Ogun Adebali

AbstractG protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) induce signal transduction pathways through coupling to four main subtypes of G proteins (Gs, Gi, Gq, G12/13), selectively. However, G protein selective activation mechanisms and residual determinants in GPCRs have remained obscure. Here, we identified conserved G protein selective activation mechanisms determining receptors’ ability to couple to a type of G protein. Herein, we performed an extensive phylogenetic analysis and identified specifically conserved residues for the receptors having similar coupling profiles in each aminergic receptor. By integrating our methodology of differential evolutionary conservation of G protein-specific amino acids with structural analyses, we identified selective activation networks for Gs, Gi1, Go, and Gq. We found that G protein selectivity is determined by not only the G protein interaction site but also other parts of the receptor including the ligand binding pocket. To validate our findings, we further studied an amino acid residue that we revealed as a selectivity-determining in Gs coupling and performed molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. We showed that previously uncharacterized Glycine at position 7×41 plays an important role in both receptor activation and Gs coupling. Finally, we gathered our results into a comprehensive model of G protein selectivity called “sequential switches of activation” describing three main molecular switches controlling GPCR activation: ligand binding, G protein selective activation mechanisms and G protein contact. We believe that our work provides a broader view on receptor-level determinants of G protein coupling selectivity.


2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 879-888 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander S. Hauser ◽  
Albert J. Kooistra ◽  
Christian Munk ◽  
Franziska M. Heydenreich ◽  
Dmitry B. Veprintsev ◽  
...  

AbstractTwo-thirds of human hormones and one-third of clinical drugs activate ~350 G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) belonging to four classes: A, B1, C and F. Whereas a model of activation has been described for class A, very little is known about the activation of the other classes, which differ by being activated by endogenous ligands bound mainly or entirely extracellularly. Here we show that, although they use the same structural scaffold and share several ‘helix macroswitches’, the GPCR classes differ in their ‘residue microswitch’ positions and contacts. We present molecular mechanistic maps of activation for each GPCR class and methods for contact analysis applicable for any functional determinants. This provides a superfamily residue-level rationale for conformational selection and allosteric communication by ligands and G proteins, laying the foundation for receptor-function studies and drugs with the desired modality.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lim Heo ◽  
Michael Feig

The family of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) is one of the largest protein families in the human genome. GPCRs transduct chemical signals from extracellular to intracellular regions via a conformational switch between active and inactive states upon ligand binding. While experimental structures of GPCRs remain limited, high-accuracy computational predictions are now possible with AlphaFold2. However, AlphaFold2 only predicts one state and is biased towards the inactive conformation. Here, a multi-state prediction protocol is introduced that extends AlphaFold2 to predict either active or inactive states at very high accuracy using state-annotated templated GPCR databases. The predicted models accurately capture the main structural changes upon activation of the GPCR at the atomic level. The models were also highly successful in predicting ligand binding poses via protein-ligand docking. We expect that high accuracy GPCR models in both activation states will promote understanding in GPCR activation mechanisms and drug discovery for GPCRs. At the time, the new protocol paves the way towards capturing the dynamics of proteins at high-accuracy via machine-learning methods.


2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathrin Ulrich ◽  
Blanche Schwappach ◽  
Ursula Jakob

AbstractThiol-based redox switches evolved as efficient post-translational regulatory mechanisms that enable individual proteins to rapidly respond to sudden environmental changes. While some protein functions need to be switched off to save resources and avoid potentially error-prone processes, protective functions become essential and need to be switched on. In this review, we focus on thiol-based activation mechanisms of stress-sensing chaperones. Upon stress exposure, these chaperones convert into high affinity binding platforms for unfolding proteins and protect cells against the accumulation of potentially toxic protein aggregates. Their chaperone activity is independent of ATP, a feature that becomes especially important under oxidative stress conditions, where cellular ATP levels drop and canonical ATP-dependent chaperones no longer operate. Vice versa, reductive inactivation and substrate release require the restoration of ATP levels, which ensures refolding of client proteins by ATP-dependent foldases. We will give an overview over the different strategies that cells evolved to rapidly increase the pool of ATP-independent chaperones upon oxidative stress and provide mechanistic insights into how stress conditions are used to convert abundant cellular proteins into ATP-independent holding chaperones.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhenfang Du ◽  
Benjamin P. Brown ◽  
Soyeon Kim ◽  
Donna Ferguson ◽  
Dean C. Pavlick ◽  
...  

AbstractMechanistic understanding of oncogenic variants facilitates the development and optimization of treatment strategies. We recently identified in-frame, tandem duplication of EGFR exons 18 - 25, which causes EGFR Kinase Domain Duplication (EGFR-KDD). Here, we characterize the prevalence of ERBB family KDDs across multiple human cancers and evaluate the functional biochemistry of EGFR-KDD as it relates to pathogenesis and potential therapeutic intervention. We provide computational and experimental evidence that EGFR-KDD functions by forming asymmetric EGF-independent intra-molecular and EGF-dependent inter-molecular dimers. Time-resolved fluorescence microscopy and co-immunoprecipitation reveals EGFR-KDD can form ligand-dependent inter-molecular homo- and hetero-dimers/multimers. Furthermore, we show that inhibition of EGFR-KDD activity is maximally achieved by blocking both intra- and inter-molecular dimerization. Collectively, our findings define a previously unrecognized model of EGFR dimerization, providing important insights for the understanding of EGFR activation mechanisms and informing personalized treatment of patients with tumors harboring EGFR-KDD. Finally, we establish ERBB KDDs as recurrent oncogenic events in multiple cancers.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 4637
Author(s):  
Daniel Barth ◽  
Andreas Lückhoff ◽  
Frank J. P. Kühn

The human apoptosis channel TRPM2 is stimulated by intracellular ADR-ribose and calcium. Recent studies show pronounced species-specific activation mechanisms. Our aim was to analyse the functional effect of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P2), commonly referred to as PIP2, on different TRPM2 orthologues. Moreover, we wished to identify the interaction site between TRPM2 and PIP2. We demonstrate a crucial role of PIP2, in the activation of TRPM2 orthologues of man, zebrafish, and sea anemone. Utilizing inside-out patch clamp recordings of HEK-293 cells transfected with TRPM2, differential effects of PIP2 that were dependent on the species variant became apparent. While depletion of PIP2 via polylysine uniformly caused complete inactivation of TRPM2, restoration of channel activity by artificial PIP2 differed widely. Human TRPM2 was the least sensitive species variant, making it the most susceptible one for regulation by changes in intramembranous PIP2 content. Furthermore, mutations of highly conserved positively charged amino acid residues in the membrane interfacial cavity reduced the PIP2 sensitivity in all three TRPM2 orthologues to varying degrees. We conclude that the membrane interfacial cavity acts as a uniform PIP2 binding site of TRPM2, facilitating channel activation in the presence of ADPR and Ca2+ in a species-specific manner.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document