scholarly journals Response of sugar beet to different foliar fertilizers

2008 ◽  
pp. 127-136
Author(s):  
Diána Ungai ◽  
Zoltan Győri
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Crop Production ◽  
Growing Season ◽  
Field Trials ◽  
Element Composition ◽  
Laboratory System ◽  
Foliar Fertilization ◽  
Cu Content ◽  
Yield And Quality

The yield and quality of the sugar beet are mainly determined by level crop production system; therefore the effects of foliar fertilization were studied. Our field trials were carried out in 2005  and 2006 in Hajdúböszörmény, at two experimental sites. In our trials the effects of Biomit Plussz, Fitohorm and Kelcare Cu (having high Cu content) as foliar fertilizers, as well as a fungicide with high sulphur content, Cosavet DF, were studied andcompared. Effects of treatments were studied in four replicates. We took root samples at 4 week intervals, starting in August. The quality of root (sucrose, potassium, sodium and alfa-amino N content) was determined from filtrated beet broth, by an automatic beet laboratory system, called VENEMA. Leaf samples were taken three times in the growing season, element composition was measured by ICP-OES.We found that the crop and the sugar yield were significantly influenced by the foliar treatments both of the two years.

scholarly journals Foliar treatments of Sugar beet

2007 ◽  
pp. 55-59
Author(s):  
Diána Ungai ◽  
Éva Széles ◽  
Zoltán Győri
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Production System ◽  
Field Trials ◽  
Foliar Nutrients ◽  
Plant Production ◽  
Laboratory System ◽  
Mineral Fertilization ◽  
Potassium Sodium ◽  
Yield And Quality

The yield and quality of the sugar beet are mainly determined by the plant production system, thus we studied the effect of mineral fertilization. Our field trials were carried out in 2005 and 2006 in Hajdúböszörmény, at two sites. We studied the effect of sulphur (Cosavet DF), copper (Kelcare Cu) and two foliar nutrients with high active agents. Treatments were replicated four times.We took root and leaf samples at 4 week intervals, starting in August. The quality of root (sucrose, potassium, sodium and alfaamino N content) was determined from filtrated beet broth, by an automatic beet laboratory system, called VENEMA. Leaf samples were measured with ICP-OES.We found that the crop and the sugar yield were significantly influenced by the foliar treatments. 

scholarly journals Results of foliar treatments on Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.)

2007 ◽  
pp. 303-308
Author(s):  
Diána Kinga Ungai ◽  
Zoltán Győri
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Beta Vulgaris ◽  
Production System ◽  
Field Trials ◽  
Plant Production ◽  
Laboratory System ◽  
Mineral Fertilization ◽  
Potassium Sodium ◽  
Yield And Quality

The yield and quality of the sugar beet are mainly determined by the plant production system, thus we studied the effect of mineral fertilization. Our field trials were carried out in 2005 and 2006 in Hajdúböszörmény, at two sites. We studied the effect of sulphur (Cosavet DF), copper (Kelcare Cu) and two foliar nutrients with high active agents. Treatments were replicated four times.We took root samples at 4 week intervals, starting in August. The quality of root (sucrose, potassium, sodium and alfa-amino N content) was determined from filtrated beet broth, by an automatic beet laboratory system, called VENEMA.We found that the crop and the sugar yield were significantly influenced by the foliar treatments in both of the two years.

scholarly journals Influence of Foliar Treatments on the yield and quality of Sugar Beet

2006 ◽  
pp. 119-123
Author(s):  
Kinga Diána Ungai ◽  
Zoltán Győri
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Production System ◽  
Field Trials ◽  
Foliar Nutrients ◽  
Plant Production ◽  
Laboratory System ◽  
Mineral Fertilization ◽  
Potassium Sodium ◽  
Yield And Quality

The yield and quality of the sugar beet are mainly determined by the plant production system, thus we studied the effect of mineral fertilization. Our field trials were carried out in 2005 in Hajdúböszörmény, at two sites. We studied the effect of sulphur (Cosavet DF), copper (Kelcare Cu) and two foliar nutrients with high active agents. Treatments were replicated four times.We took root samples at 4 week intervals, starting in August. The quality of root (sucrose, potassium, sodium and alfa-amino N content) was determined from filtrated beet broth, by an automatic beet laboratory system, called VENEMA.We found that the crop and the sugar yield were significantly influenced by the foliar treatments

Impact of Nano-Micronutrients as Foliar Fertilization on Yield and Quality of Sugar Beet Roots

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. 1416-1423
Author(s):  
Mohamed Said Abbas ◽  
Adel Saad El-Ha ◽  
Mohamed Desouki Ha ◽  
Hamdy Abd Elfattah A
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Foliar Fertilization ◽  
Yield And Quality

Yield and quality of sugar beet crown as well as leaf yieldof different sugar beet varieties and a fodder beet

2011 ◽  
pp. 555-564
Author(s):  
Christa Hoffmann
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Dry Matter ◽  
Recovery Process ◽  
Sodium Concentration ◽  
Field Trials ◽  
N Application ◽  
Fodder Beet ◽  
Yield Increase ◽  
Yield And Quality

Since sugar beet varieties differ in beet yield and quality, varieties may exist which are more profitable for a harvest including the crown because of a larger crown with a better quality compared to other varieties. In 2009 and 2010 field trials with 8 sugar beet varieties and one fodder beet were conducted at 4 sites, and additionally a field trial with N application from 0, 100, 200, and 300 kg N ha–1. At harvest the crown was removed manually below the green leaf scares, root and crown were analyzed separately. The results show that yield and quality of the crown have not changed in relation to the root during the breeding progress. Differences among varieties in yield and quality continue in the crown. Varieties can, therefore, be chosen according to the known variety characteristics also when the crown is harvested. For the use in the fermentation process the incorporation of the crown will result in yield increase which is similar for all varieties. There were only little differences in leaf dry matter and similar root to leaf ratios for the sugar beet varieties. Increasing N application caused an increase of the amino N and sodium concentration, which was more pronounced in the crown than in the root. The concentration of invert sugar, raffinose, betaine and glutamine was higher in the crown than in the root. However, changes were similar for all varieties. The effect of these changes in quality on the sugar recovery process can only be studied in processing experiments.

Saflufenacil Carryover Injury Varies among Rotational Crops

2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darren E. Robinson ◽  
Kristen E. McNaughton
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Growth Yield ◽  
Dry Weight ◽  
Sugar Beet Plant ◽  
Root Weight ◽  
Carrot Root ◽  
Field Corn ◽  
Yield And Quality ◽  
Weight Yield

Trials were established in 2007, 2008, and 2009 in Ontario, Canada, to determine the effect of soil residues of saflufenacil on growth, yield, and quality of eight rotational crops planted 1 yr after application. In the year of establishment, saflufenacil was applied PRE to field corn at rates of 75, 100, and 200 g ai ha−1. Cabbage, carrot, cucumber, onion, pea, pepper, potato, and sugar beet were planted 1 yr later, maintained weed-free, and plant dry weight, yield, and quality measures of interest to processors for each crop were determined. Reductions in dry weight and yield of all grades of cucumber were determined at both the 100 and 200 g ha−1rates of saflufenacil. Plant dry weight, bulb number, and size and yield of onion were also reduced by saflufenacil at 100 and 200 g ha−1. Sugar beet plant dry weight and yield, but not sucrose content, were decreased by saflufenacil at 100 and 200 g ha−1. Cabbage plant dry weight, head size, and yield; carrot root weight and yield; and pepper dry weight, fruit number and size, and yield were only reduced in those treatments in which twice the field corn rate had been applied to simulate the effect of spray overlap in the previous year. Pea and potato were not negatively impacted by applications of saflufenacil in the year prior to planting. It is recommended that cabbage, carrot, cucumber, onion, pepper, and sugar beet not be planted the year after saflufenacil application at rates up to 200 g ha−1. Pea and potato can be safely planted the year following application of saflufenacil up to rates of 200 g ha−1.

Organic and inorganic fertilization influenced on yield and quality of sugar beet genotypes

2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 218-223
Author(s):  
Irshad Ahmad ◽  
Bashir Ahmad ◽  
Shahzad Ali ◽  
Han Qing Fang ◽  
Tiening Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Yield And Quality
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document