scholarly journals Robotic Surgery in Gastrointestinal Surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Kenoki Ohuchida

Robotic surgery is expanding in the minimally invasive treatment of gastrointestinal cancer. In the field of gastrointestinal cancer, robotic surgery is performed using a robot-assisted surgery system. In this system, the robot does not operate automatically but is controlled by the surgeon. The surgery assistant robot currently used in clinical practice worldwide is the leader-follower type, including the da Vinci® Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical). This review describes the current state of robotic surgery in the treatment of gastrointestinal cancer and discusses the future development of robotic systems in gastrointestinal surgery.

2015 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitros Deligiannis ◽  
Ioannis Anastasiou ◽  
Vasileios Mygdalis ◽  
Evangelos Fragkiadis ◽  
Konstantinos Stravodimos

Objective: To determine the attitudinal change for urologic surgery in Greece since the introduction of the da Vinci Surgical System (DVS). We describe contemporary trends at public hospital level, the initial Greek experience, while at the same time Greece is in economic crisis and funding is under austerity measures. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed annualized case log data on urologic procedures, between 2008 (installation of the DVS) and 2013, from “Laiko’’ Hospital in Athens. We evaluated, using summary statistics, trends and institutional status regarding robot-assisted surgery (RAS). We also analyzed the relationship between the introduction of RAS and change in total volume of procedures performed. Results: 1578 of the urological procedures performed at “Laiko’’ Hospital were pooled, 1342 (85%) being open and 236 RAS (15%). We observed a 6-fold increase in the number of RAS performed, from 7% of the total procedural volume (14/212) in 2008 to 30% (96/331) in 2013. For radical prostatectomy, in 2008 2% were robot-assisted and 98% open while in 2013, 46% and 54% respectively. Pyeloplasty was performed more often using the robot-assisted method since 2010. RAS-dedicated surgeons increased both RAS and the total number of procedures they performed. From 86 in 2008 to 145 in 2013, with 57% of them being RAS in 2013 as compared to 13 % in 2008. Conclusions: Robot-assisted surgery has integrated into the armamentarium for urologic surgery in Greece at public hospital level. Surgical robot acquisition is also associated with increased volume of procedures, especially prostatectomy, despite the ongoing debate over cost-effectiveness, during economic crisis and International Monetary Fund (IFN) era.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yutaka Kojima ◽  
Kazuhiro Sakamoto ◽  
Shigeo Horie ◽  
Yuichi Tomiki ◽  
Masaya Kawai ◽  
...  

Abstract Robotic surgery has become prevalent in many departments all over the world because of its usefulness. It is used in many cases, as well as in gastrointestinal surgery, which treats the rectum as pelvic surgery, urology and gynecology. We experienced two cases of joint surgery, with urology as pelvic surgery. The patient underwent robot-assisted low anterior resection, combined prostate resection and ileostomy for prostate invasion of rectal cancer. He was discharged without any complications. Robotic surgery was considered to be useful in surgery to manipulate the same area. In addition, it was considered that smoother and safer surgical procedure could be possible by conducting preoperative meetings with the participating departments.


2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 1513-1517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos E. Mendez-Probst ◽  
George Vilos ◽  
Andrew Fuller ◽  
Alfonso Fernandez ◽  
Paul Borg ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 496-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norihiko Ishikawa ◽  
Masahiko Kawaguchi ◽  
Hideki Moriyama ◽  
Nobuhiro Tanaka ◽  
Go Watanabe

Retina ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 154-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
DAN H. BOURLA ◽  
JEAN PIERRE HUBSCHMAN ◽  
MARTIN CULJAT ◽  
ANGELO TSIRBAS ◽  
ANURAG GUPTA ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cas D.P. van’t Hullenaar ◽  
Ben Hermans ◽  
Ivo A.M.J. Broeders

AbstractBackground:Robot-assisted surgery is considered to improve ergonomics over standard endoscopic surgery. Nevertheless, previous research demonstrated ergonomic deficits in the current console set-up.Aim:This study was designed to objectively assess body posture in the da Vinci console during robot-assisted endoscopic surgery.Methods:Multiple sagittal photographs from six physicians were taken during robot-assisted procedures. Trunk, neck, shoulder, elbow, hip, and knee angles were calculated and compared to ergonomic preferable joint angles. A 2D geometric model was developed using individual anthropometrics. Optimal seat height, armrest height, and viewer height were calculated. These results were compared to the findings of the sagittal photographs.Results:Mean joint angles show potentially harmful neck angles for all participants. Trunk angles vary between surgeons, from inadequate to correct. In short and very tall individuals, optimal armrest height is outside the adjustment range of the console.Conclusion:The da Vinci Surgical System console seating position results in a nonergonomic neck and trunk angle. The developed geometric model revealed that armrest height has a limited adjustment range. Adjustments to the console and optimization of preoperative settings are goals to further improve ergonomics in robot-assisted surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document